Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.53 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.52 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.40 · 57.5% (46 of 80 decks)
- Hulkbuster Armor relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.41 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.45 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.29 · 72.5% (58 of 80 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.45 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.42 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.34 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.42 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.33 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Wrecking Ball Arm relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.38 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.30 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.33 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.35 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.30 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Wealth and Power relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.33 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.24 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Swordsman's Steel relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.27 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Elgaud Shieldmate relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Jocasta, Automaton Avenger relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
Card Stacks
26
Card Stacks
26Showing 1-2 of 26
Cards like Lyla, Holographic Assistant
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant 49%
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger 35%
- Clinquant Skymage 5%
- Oneirophage 4%
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment 4%
Other options: Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Wizard Class
7.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Pongify
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 53%
- Rapid Hybridization 46%
Cards like Silent Arbiter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Silent Arbiter 25%
- Crawlspace 16%
Cards like Adaptive Omnitool
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Adaptive Omnitool 19%
- Nettlecyst 18%
Cards like Mithril Coat
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 35%
- Darksteel Plate 19%
Cards like Shore Up
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shore Up 28%
- Octopus Form 9%
- Mizzium Skin 6%
- Chase Inspiration 5%
- Magic Damper 5%
- Dive Down 3%
Other options: Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield
Cards like Flux Channeler
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 33%
- Dreamtide Whale 15%
Cards like Combat Research
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Combat Research 57%
- Curious Obsession 13%
Cards like Professor Hulk
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards like Thrummingbird
7.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mask of Memory
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Frogify
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Frogify 18%
- Amphibian Downpour 15%
Cards like Curiosity
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Curiosity 38%
- Ophidian Eye 6%
Cards like Brainstorm
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 57%
- Brainsurge 15%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 57%
- Lightning Greaves 26%
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 33% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 76%
- Negate 33%
- Wash Away 10%
- Intervene 1%
- Stern Scolding 1%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Opt
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Sword of the Animist
7.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contentious Plan
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Kid Loki
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Lat-Nam Adept, Knights of Dol Amroth, Erudite Wizard, Lakeshore Apothecary, Thopter Mechanic, Knowledge Seeker, Otter-Penguin, Atlantean Cavalry
Cards like Vnwxt, Verbose Host
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Hammer of Nazahn
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Stubborn Denial
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.52 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.44 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.45 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.42 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.34 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.42 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.38 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.38 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.27 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Elgaud Shieldmate relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Jocasta, Automaton Avenger relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.23 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- April O'Neil, Human Element relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Archmage's Newt relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Helmut Zemo, Mastermind relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Brass Squire relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Donatello, Gadget Master relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hraesvelgr of the First Brood relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.16 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Deadeye Quartermaster relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Core Prowler relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Hulkbuster Armor relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.41 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.45 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.41 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Wrecking Ball Arm relevance 0.43 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.30 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.35 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.33 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.35 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.30 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Wealth and Power relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Excalibur, Sword of Eden relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.36 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.33 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.34 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.35 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Swordsman's Steel relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.36 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.31 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.33 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.29 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.27 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Hand of Vecna relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Once and Future relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Prying Blade relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 57.5% (46 of 80 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.18 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Unstable Molecule Suit relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.53 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.40 · 57.5% (46 of 80 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.33 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.33 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.24 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.19 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.20 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Ordeal of Thassa relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Vanishing relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Confounding Conundrum relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.14 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Old Fat Spider Can't See Me relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Secret Invasion relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Frozen in Ice relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.29 · 72.5% (58 of 80 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.29 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.25 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.27 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Reality Ripple relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.15 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Fumble relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.14 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Chase Inspiration relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.15 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.11 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.10 · 57.5% (46 of 80 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.10 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.12 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.10 · 51.2% (41 of 80 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.12 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Blustersquall relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.14 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.10 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.23 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.20 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.14 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Distorted Curiosity relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mitotic Manipulation relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sleep relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
Planeswalkers
5
Planeswalkers
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
All planeswalkers (5)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
Utility Lands
45
Utility Lands
45 Showing 1-10 of 45
All utility lands (45)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.41 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.18 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.16 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.15 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 70.0% (56 of 80 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 60.0% (48 of 80 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.11 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
Lands
16
Lands
16 Showing 1-10 of 16
All lands (16)
- Command Tower relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Branch of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 91.3% (73 of 80 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lockjaw, Slobbering Teleporter, from 80 real Commander decks.