Cards like Hardened Scales
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards like Opt
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Reconnaissance Mission
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Wizard Class
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Shore Up
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 28%
- Magic Damper 11%
- Dive Down 6%
- Shell Shield 6%
- Chase Inspiration 6%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Octopus Form
Cards like Ant-Man, Colony Commander
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Negate
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Negate 39%
- Counterspell 39%
- Minor Misstep 6%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Iron Man, Armored Avenger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger 28%
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant 11%
- Oneirophage 6%
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment 6%
Other options: Ravenhill Flock, Clinquant Skymage
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Blossoming Defense
Cards like Training Grounds
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 39%
- Cultivate 33%
- Kodama's Reach 17%
- Shared Roots 17%
- Terramorph 6%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 56%
- Elvish Mystic 28%
- Fyndhorn Elves 6%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Restorative Technique
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Training Regimen
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Training Regimen 22%
- Sphere Grid 6%
Cards like Frantic Search
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets 22%
- Ultimecia, Temporal Threat 6%
- Keeper of Fables 6%
- Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar 6%
Other options: Spider-Man 2099, Miguel O'Hara
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 50%
- Incubation Druid 11%
- Gyre Sage 11%
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Curve
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 33%
- Pongify 22%
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
4.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Pensive Professor
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Brainstorm
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 56%
- Brainsurge 17%
Cards like Lessons from Life
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Decisive Denial
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Decisive Denial 17%
- Quandrix Charm 11%
All top picks (50)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.42 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.40 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.40 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.39 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.34 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.37 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.35 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.37 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.26 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.30 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.20 · 83.3% (15 of 18 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.29 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.31 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.21 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.27 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.19 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.20 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.26 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.29 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.23 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.27 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.27 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.27 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.24 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Fight for the Throne relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Quantum Reduction relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Forgotten Creation relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Depower relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.40 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.40 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.34 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.37 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.35 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.26 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.30 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.31 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.21 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.23 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.24 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Forgotten Creation relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Raucous Entertainer relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.21 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.20 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.21 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.18 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.16 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Ornery Tumblewagg relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Broodguard Elite relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.42 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 66.7% (12 of 18 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.16 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Sword of the Squeak relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Crown of Gondor relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sword of War and Peace relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 77.8% (14 of 18 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.03 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.37 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.20 · 83.3% (15 of 18 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.29 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.29 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.27 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Rewrite History relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Quantum Reduction relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.19 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.21 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.21 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.21 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.14 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Freyalise's Radiance relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Illusionary Terrain relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mysterio's Mirage relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Origin of the Hulk relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Oath of Scholars relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Kitnap relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Flight of Fancy relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Durable Handicraft relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All instants (50)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.35 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.27 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.19 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.20 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.26 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.29 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.27 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Depower relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Fight for the Throne relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.23 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.19 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.14 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Thing Swing relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Dismissive Denial relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- I Am Iron Man relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Catalog relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- First Family relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Refresh relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Feral Ferocity relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Timeline Inquiry relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Beast Mode relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Punishing Punch relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Woodcutter's Grit relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Jolt relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Terrific Team-Up relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.39 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 55.6% (10 of 18 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.27 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.19 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.24 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.20 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.17 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.17 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.16 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.12 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Hulk's Thunderclap relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Colossal Collision relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Trickster's Stratagem relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Fantastic Bounce relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- It's Clobberin' Time! relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Atlantis Attacks relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- West Coast Expansion relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Fantastic Elasticity relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Worlds Within Worlds relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ancestral Communion relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Day's Undoing relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Pyrulea // Gargantuan Slabhorn relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Avengers Tower relevance 0.25 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Villainous Hideout relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Surveillance Room relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Great Mound relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.13 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.10 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.11 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.10 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.07 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.07 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.08 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.06 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.05 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.04 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All lands (30)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.30 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.22 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (9 of 18 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.17 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.18 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 27.8% (5 of 18 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.13 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.14 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.09 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.11 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.09 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.07 · 44.4% (8 of 18 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.06 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.06 · 61.1% (11 of 18 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.04 · 72.2% (13 of 18 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.05 · 38.9% (7 of 18 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.07 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.06 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.05 · 22.2% (4 of 18 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.05 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 94.4% (17 of 18 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.04 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (18 of 18 decks)
- Island relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (18 of 18 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Astonishing Ant-Man, from 18 real Commander decks.