Cards like Gallant Citizen
5.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Gallant Citizen 36%
- Spirited Companion 13%
- Elvish Visionary 10%
- Llanowar Visionary 10%
- Helpful Hunter 8%
- Kindly Customer 4%
- Salt Road Packbeast 3%
- Search Party Captain 3%
- Owlbear 1%
- Generous Stray 1%
- Roving Harper 1%
- Joraga Visionary 1%
Other options: Kavu Climber, Shaman of Spring, Rhox Oracle, Wall of Omens, Pyknite, Striped Bears, Carven Caryatid, Arctic Wolves, Multani's Acolyte, Wall of Blossoms
Cards like Evolution Witness
11× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
3.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 27%
- Incubation Druid 18%
- Gyre Sage 13%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 48%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 37%
- Elvish Mystic 30%
- Fyndhorn Elves 23%
- Boreal Druid 7%
- Goobbue Gardener 3%
- Rootrider Faun 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Druid of the Cowl, Steward of Valeron, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Whitemane Lion
12× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Whitemane Lion 17%
- Kor Skyfisher 9%
- Aviary Mechanic 5%
- Exosuit Savior 3%
- Stickytongue Sentinel 3%
- Jeskai Barricade 1%
- Invasive Species 1%
- Stonecloaker 1%
- Rescuer Chwinga 1%
Other options: Flock Impostor, Mischievous Pup, Emancipation Angel, Dust Elemental, Ambush Krotiq, Loyal Gryff
Cards like Web-Warriors
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like The Earth Crystal
3.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
5.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Trollbred Guardian, Crowned Ceratok, Baloth Pup
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Good-Fortune Unicorn
3.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Kapow!
20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kapow! 22%
- Primal Might 1%
- Troll Negotiations 1%
Other options: Epic Confrontation, Malamet Battle Glyph, Ent's Fury, Wild Instincts, Hunt the Weak, Ruthless Predation, Mage Duel, Chelonian Tackle, Struggle for Skemfar, Savage Swipe
Cards like Grow Extra Arms
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Monstrous Growth, Wielding the Green Dragon, Feral Ferocity, Mammoth Growth
Cards like Spider-Man, Web-Slinger
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sudden Strike
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Immolating Glare, Puncturing Light, Divine Verdict, Fierce Retribution, Kill Shot, Just Fate, Terashi's Verdict, Searing Light, Vanquish, Eightfold Maze, Enduring Victory, Neck Snap, Rebuke
Cards like Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary
8.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Primeval Herald, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Web Up
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Armorcraft Judge
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.63 · 55.5% (81 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Man, Web-Slinger relevance 0.64 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Spider-UK relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Guy in the Chair relevance 0.61 · 27.4% (40 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Girl, Legacy Hero relevance 0.57 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Spectacular Tactics relevance 0.53 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Web-Warriors relevance 0.55 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Selfless Police Captain relevance 0.59 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.58 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.58 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Pictures of Spider-Man relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Gallant Citizen relevance 0.51 · 35.6% (52 of 146 decks)
- Silk, Web Weaver relevance 0.45 · 45.9% (67 of 146 decks)
- Daily Bugle Reporters relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.55 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Costume Closet relevance 0.53 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Sudden Strike relevance 0.53 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Web Up relevance 0.52 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Thwip! relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.54 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Silver Sable, Mercenary Leader relevance 0.54 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Web-Shooters relevance 0.55 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.55 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.55 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Aunt May relevance 0.47 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Mary Jane Watson relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Arachne, Psionic Weaver relevance 0.51 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Damage Control Crew relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.51 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Terrific Team-Up relevance 0.53 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.48 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Subway Train relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- City Pigeon relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Spectacular Spider-Man relevance 0.41 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Wild Pack Squad relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Bagel and Schmear relevance 0.46 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Mechanical Mobster relevance 0.51 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.35 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Mobile relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.39 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Origin of Spider-Man relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Starling, Aerial Ally relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.63 · 55.5% (81 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Man, Web-Slinger relevance 0.64 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Spider-UK relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Guy in the Chair relevance 0.61 · 27.4% (40 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Girl, Legacy Hero relevance 0.57 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Web-Warriors relevance 0.55 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Selfless Police Captain relevance 0.59 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.58 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Gallant Citizen relevance 0.51 · 35.6% (52 of 146 decks)
- Silk, Web Weaver relevance 0.45 · 45.9% (67 of 146 decks)
- Daily Bugle Reporters relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.54 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Silver Sable, Mercenary Leader relevance 0.54 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Bot relevance 0.55 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Aunt May relevance 0.47 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.56 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Mary Jane Watson relevance 0.54 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Arachne, Psionic Weaver relevance 0.51 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Damage Control Crew relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Radioactive Spider relevance 0.48 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- City Pigeon relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Spectacular Spider-Man relevance 0.41 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Wild Pack Squad relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Mechanical Mobster relevance 0.51 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Metastatic Evangel relevance 0.35 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Starling, Aerial Ally relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Flash Thompson, Spider-Fan relevance 0.37 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Raucous Audience relevance 0.38 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Professional Wrestler relevance 0.45 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Haliya, Ascendant Cadet relevance 0.32 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Aviary Mechanic relevance 0.43 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Leonardo, Big Brother relevance 0.41 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- News Helicopter relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Kraven's Cats relevance 0.41 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.30 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Slayer, Hatred Honed relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 0.37 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Man, Miles Morales relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Twisted Spider-Clone relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Hero in Training relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Chronicler of Heroes relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Grateful Apparition relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (46)
- Pictures of Spider-Man relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Costume Closet relevance 0.53 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Web-Shooters relevance 0.55 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Subway Train relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Suit relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Bagel and Schmear relevance 0.46 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Spider-Mobile relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.47 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Hot Dog Cart relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Interdimensional Web Watch relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Atmospheric Greenhouse relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.22 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Rocket-Powered Goblin Glider relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Greatsword of Tyr relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Monk's Fist relevance 0.29 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Genesis Chamber relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Meltstrider's Gear relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Explorer's Cache relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.12 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 41.1% (60 of 146 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 54.1% (79 of 146 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Web Up relevance 0.52 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.55 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Origin of Spider-Man relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Rent Is Due relevance 0.33 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Kraven's Last Hunt relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Friendly Neighborhood relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- With Great Power . . . relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Political Triumph relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.19 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.18 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Captured by Lagacs relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.18 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Assemble the Players relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Seismic Tutelage relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Static Snare relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Uneasy Alliance relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.17 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Path to Redemption relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
All instants (50)
- Spectacular Tactics relevance 0.53 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.58 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Sudden Strike relevance 0.53 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Thwip! relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Terrific Team-Up relevance 0.53 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.39 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.21 · 37.7% (55 of 146 decks)
- Airbending Lesson relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Witch's Web relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Make Your Move relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.22 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Signature Slam relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- You're Not Alone relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Zuko's Exile relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Fleeting Flight relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Break Ties relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Emergency Eject relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Unbounded Potential relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- The Last Ronin's Technique relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Razor Rings relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Enter the Avatar State relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Fog of War relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Divine Resilience relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Valorous Stance relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Kapow! relevance 0.55 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.51 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- What Must Be Done relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Hulk's Thunderclap relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Valgavoth's Onslaught relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Moment of Glory relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Travel Preparations relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Cartographer's Survey relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Sami's Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Ascend from Avernus relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Survivors' Bond relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Recommission relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.11 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Ajani, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.45 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Skyclave Cleric // Skyclave Basilica relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.11 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Cave of the Frost Dragon relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.11 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Kabira Crossroads relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
All lands (50)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.44 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.33 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.15 · 27.4% (40 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Birnin Zana Plaza relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.13 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.10 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.11 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.09 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.11 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.08 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.11 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.08 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.07 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.06 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.07 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.05 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.09 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 57.5% (84 of 146 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 84.9% (124 of 146 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Spider-Man India, from 146 real Commander decks.