Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.67 · 59.3% (2,169 of 3,657 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.74 · 41.1% (1,502 of 3,657 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.78 · 32.9% (1,203 of 3,657 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.76 · 29.9% (1,092 of 3,657 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.80 · 21.9% (800 of 3,657 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.77 · 23.0% (841 of 3,657 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.77 · 19.9% (727 of 3,657 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (848 of 3,657 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.55 · 49.5% (1,812 of 3,657 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.70 · 25.3% (926 of 3,657 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.76 · 16.1% (590 of 3,657 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.54 · 47.6% (1,740 of 3,657 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.67 · 26.5% (970 of 3,657 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.69 · 22.1% (808 of 3,657 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.59 · 36.7% (1,342 of 3,657 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.64 · 28.2% (1,031 of 3,657 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.60 · 34.1% (1,248 of 3,657 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (441 of 3,657 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.67 · 23.3% (853 of 3,657 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.60 · 34.2% (1,252 of 3,657 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.61 · 31.3% (1,145 of 3,657 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.57 · 36.7% (1,341 of 3,657 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.62 · 27.8% (1,016 of 3,657 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.86 · 6.7% (246 of 3,657 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.62 · 27.6% (1,008 of 3,657 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.60 · 28.8% (1,055 of 3,657 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.78 · 9.5% (349 of 3,657 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.68 · 16.1% (588 of 3,657 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (524 of 3,657 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.54 · 37.0% (1,352 of 3,657 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.54 · 36.3% (1,327 of 3,657 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.57 · 31.5% (1,151 of 3,657 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.47 · 50.4% (1,842 of 3,657 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.60 · 24.6% (898 of 3,657 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.76 · 8.3% (302 of 3,657 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (599 of 3,657 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.73 · 9.8% (358 of 3,657 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 0.81 · 5.1% (186 of 3,657 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.47 · 45.6% (1,667 of 3,657 decks)
- Pinnacle Kill-Ship relevance 0.80 · 5.6% (206 of 3,657 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.81 · 5.2% (191 of 3,657 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.79 · 5.9% (214 of 3,657 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.43 · 54.4% (1,990 of 3,657 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.60 · 21.1% (772 of 3,657 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.50 · 38.2% (1,397 of 3,657 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.71 · 10.4% (379 of 3,657 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (425 of 3,657 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.44 · 49.6% (1,815 of 3,657 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.73 · 8.0% (293 of 3,657 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.85 · 4.5% (165 of 3,657 decks)
Card Stacks
30
Card Stacks
30Showing 1-2 of 30
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 53%
- Foundry Inspector 41%
- Cloud Key 17%
- Helm of Awakening 1%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Fabricate
6.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 42%
- Scour for Scrap 38%
Cards like Opt
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Magic Damper
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Magic Damper 25%
- Shore Up 22%
- Octopus Form 17%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Chase Inspiration, You See a Guard Approach, Glint, Shell Shield
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 28%
- Refocus 22%
Cards like Vedalken Archmage
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vedalken Archmage 36%
- Riddlesmith 28%
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 42%
- Rhystic Study 39%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 32%
- Urza's Bauble 14%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 82%
- Basalt Monolith 19%
- Mana Vault 12%
- Grim Monolith 8%
Cards like Mystic Forge
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 35%
- Lightning Greaves 35%
Cards like Mirran Spy
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Cryogen Relic
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cryogen Relic 28%
- Sewer-veillance Cam 15%
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Master Transmuter
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shimmer Myr
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ur-Golem's Eye, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Krang, Utrom Warlord
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 58%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Mind Stone
3.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 31%
- Chromatic Sphere 6%
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
2.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Triplicate Titan
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contentious Plan
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Patriar's Seal
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Patriar's Seal 16%
- Bender's Waterskin 14%
Other options: Relic of Legends, Victory Chimes, Honor-Worn Shaku, Spectral Searchlight
Cards like Unwinding Clock
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Mirran Spy relevance 0.67 · 59.3% (2,169 of 3,657 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.74 · 41.1% (1,502 of 3,657 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.78 · 32.9% (1,203 of 3,657 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.77 · 19.9% (727 of 3,657 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (848 of 3,657 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.70 · 25.3% (926 of 3,657 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.54 · 47.6% (1,740 of 3,657 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.67 · 26.5% (970 of 3,657 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.69 · 22.1% (808 of 3,657 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.64 · 28.2% (1,031 of 3,657 decks)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.60 · 34.1% (1,248 of 3,657 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.60 · 34.2% (1,252 of 3,657 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.86 · 6.7% (246 of 3,657 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.60 · 28.8% (1,055 of 3,657 decks)
- Iron Man, Bleeding Edge relevance 0.78 · 9.5% (349 of 3,657 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.69 · 14.3% (524 of 3,657 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.54 · 36.3% (1,327 of 3,657 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.57 · 31.5% (1,151 of 3,657 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.47 · 50.4% (1,842 of 3,657 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (599 of 3,657 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.73 · 9.8% (358 of 3,657 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 0.81 · 5.1% (186 of 3,657 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.47 · 45.6% (1,667 of 3,657 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.81 · 5.2% (191 of 3,657 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.43 · 54.4% (1,990 of 3,657 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (425 of 3,657 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.44 · 49.6% (1,815 of 3,657 decks)
- Iron Lad, Diverging Destiny relevance 0.76 · 6.4% (235 of 3,657 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.61 · 15.1% (552 of 3,657 decks)
- Platinum Emperion relevance 0.69 · 9.5% (346 of 3,657 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.69 · 9.4% (345 of 3,657 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.70 · 8.3% (305 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.48 · 34.7% (1,268 of 3,657 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.64 · 11.4% (417 of 3,657 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.67 · 8.2% (299 of 3,657 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.43 · 42.4% (1,552 of 3,657 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.45 · 37.5% (1,373 of 3,657 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.68 · 6.8% (250 of 3,657 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.64 · 9.0% (330 of 3,657 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.62 · 9.4% (345 of 3,657 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (313 of 3,657 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.67 · 5.1% (186 of 3,657 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.63 · 7.8% (287 of 3,657 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.61 · 9.1% (334 of 3,657 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.35 · 53.1% (1,941 of 3,657 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.52 · 15.3% (559 of 3,657 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (310 of 3,657 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.42 · 33.1% (1,212 of 3,657 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (441 of 3,657 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.51 · 14.5% (530 of 3,657 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- The Endstone relevance 0.76 · 29.9% (1,092 of 3,657 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.77 · 23.0% (841 of 3,657 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.55 · 49.5% (1,812 of 3,657 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.76 · 16.1% (590 of 3,657 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.59 · 36.7% (1,342 of 3,657 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (441 of 3,657 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.67 · 23.3% (853 of 3,657 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.61 · 31.3% (1,145 of 3,657 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.57 · 36.7% (1,341 of 3,657 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.62 · 27.8% (1,016 of 3,657 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.68 · 16.1% (588 of 3,657 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.54 · 37.0% (1,352 of 3,657 decks)
- Mox Tantalite relevance 0.76 · 8.3% (302 of 3,657 decks)
- Pinnacle Kill-Ship relevance 0.80 · 5.6% (206 of 3,657 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.79 · 5.9% (214 of 3,657 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.60 · 21.1% (772 of 3,657 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.71 · 10.4% (379 of 3,657 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.73 · 8.0% (293 of 3,657 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.85 · 4.5% (165 of 3,657 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (436 of 3,657 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.70 · 9.0% (329 of 3,657 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.59 · 17.1% (627 of 3,657 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (715 of 3,657 decks)
- Sleeper Dart relevance 0.84 · 4.3% (158 of 3,657 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.55 · 22.6% (826 of 3,657 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.74 · 5.1% (186 of 3,657 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.67 · 8.5% (310 of 3,657 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (559 of 3,657 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.72 · 5.2% (191 of 3,657 decks)
- Alchemist's Vial relevance 0.78 · 4.5% (165 of 3,657 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.50 · 27.7% (1,012 of 3,657 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.61 · 11.5% (421 of 3,657 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.56 · 14.8% (541 of 3,657 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.68 · 5.2% (191 of 3,657 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.67 · 6.1% (223 of 3,657 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.70 · 4.8% (174 of 3,657 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.45 · 31.7% (1,161 of 3,657 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.67 · 5.0% (184 of 3,657 decks)
- Golden Egg relevance 0.79 · 4.0% (145 of 3,657 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.42 · 35.0% (1,279 of 3,657 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.64 · 5.9% (216 of 3,657 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.62 · 7.1% (261 of 3,657 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.43 · 30.8% (1,125 of 3,657 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.63 · 6.0% (220 of 3,657 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.64 · 5.1% (188 of 3,657 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.47 · 22.6% (828 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.51 · 13.9% (508 of 3,657 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (414 of 3,657 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (350 of 3,657 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.56 · 8.6% (313 of 3,657 decks)
Enchantments
25
Enchantments
25 Showing 1-10 of 25
All enchantments (25)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.57 · 13.9% (510 of 3,657 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.59 · 9.7% (355 of 3,657 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.48 · 19.0% (696 of 3,657 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.48 · 18.4% (673 of 3,657 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (719 of 3,657 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.59 · 5.2% (191 of 3,657 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (345 of 3,657 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (388 of 3,657 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (265 of 3,657 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.51 · 5.1% (187 of 3,657 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.44 · 8.8% (323 of 3,657 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.47 · 5.6% (206 of 3,657 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.27 · 42.2% (1,542 of 3,657 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.58 · 2.9% (106 of 3,657 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.24 · 39.0% (1,427 of 3,657 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.54 · 2.8% (104 of 3,657 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (111 of 3,657 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (119 of 3,657 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (425 of 3,657 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (102 of 3,657 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (127 of 3,657 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (282 of 3,657 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (683 of 3,657 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (106 of 3,657 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (110 of 3,657 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Refocus relevance 0.80 · 21.9% (800 of 3,657 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.62 · 27.6% (1,008 of 3,657 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.60 · 24.6% (898 of 3,657 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.50 · 38.2% (1,397 of 3,657 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.71 · 7.4% (270 of 3,657 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.57 · 17.2% (629 of 3,657 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (802 of 3,657 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.68 · 6.0% (220 of 3,657 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.54 · 14.8% (541 of 3,657 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.52 · 17.0% (621 of 3,657 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.70 · 4.1% (149 of 3,657 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (272 of 3,657 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (289 of 3,657 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.54 · 7.3% (266 of 3,657 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (205 of 3,657 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.37 · 33.5% (1,226 of 3,657 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.54 · 5.5% (201 of 3,657 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.54 · 5.0% (184 of 3,657 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.53 · 5.4% (199 of 3,657 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.66 · 3.6% (133 of 3,657 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.30 · 45.2% (1,654 of 3,657 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.33 · 31.2% (1,142 of 3,657 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (241 of 3,657 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (316 of 3,657 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.57 · 3.7% (135 of 3,657 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.44 · 7.1% (258 of 3,657 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (525 of 3,657 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.41 · 9.0% (330 of 3,657 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.57 · 3.5% (127 of 3,657 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.37 · 12.6% (461 of 3,657 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (207 of 3,657 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.59 · 3.2% (118 of 3,657 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.49 · 4.2% (152 of 3,657 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.36 · 10.9% (398 of 3,657 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.20 · 63.2% (2,310 of 3,657 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (233 of 3,657 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (329 of 3,657 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.23 · 44.7% (1,633 of 3,657 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (262 of 3,657 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.32 · 14.8% (542 of 3,657 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (854 of 3,657 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (156 of 3,657 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.30 · 14.8% (542 of 3,657 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.56 · 2.5% (91 of 3,657 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (207 of 3,657 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (233 of 3,657 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 44.5% (1,626 of 3,657 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.49 · 3.1% (112 of 3,657 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.24 · 31.0% (1,134 of 3,657 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 22.3% (814 of 3,657 decks)
Sorceries
16
Sorceries
16 Showing 1-10 of 16
All sorceries (16)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (556 of 3,657 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (580 of 3,657 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.46 · 29.9% (1,092 of 3,657 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.59 · 10.0% (367 of 3,657 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.42 · 27.2% (993 of 3,657 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.33 · 42.0% (1,536 of 3,657 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.50 · 8.0% (293 of 3,657 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.51 · 4.7% (173 of 3,657 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (117 of 3,657 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.39 · 7.2% (264 of 3,657 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.28 · 27.2% (993 of 3,657 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (211 of 3,657 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.25 · 33.0% (1,208 of 3,657 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (117 of 3,657 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (315 of 3,657 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (116 of 3,657 decks)
Planeswalkers
9
Planeswalkers
9 Showing 1-9 of 9
All planeswalkers (9)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.50 · 27.8% (1,018 of 3,657 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (306 of 3,657 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.56 · 5.0% (183 of 3,657 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (501 of 3,657 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (226 of 3,657 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.51 · 4.8% (174 of 3,657 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.50 · 4.0% (147 of 3,657 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (157 of 3,657 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (124 of 3,657 decks)
Utility Lands
36
Utility Lands
36 Showing 1-10 of 36
All utility lands (36)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.46 · 33.7% (1,231 of 3,657 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.41 · 42.7% (1,560 of 3,657 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (466 of 3,657 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (549 of 3,657 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.51 · 13.9% (509 of 3,657 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.40 · 35.1% (1,282 of 3,657 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.43 · 29.1% (1,063 of 3,657 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.39 · 35.9% (1,314 of 3,657 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.33 · 47.2% (1,727 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.34 · 31.3% (1,144 of 3,657 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (182 of 3,657 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.42 · 10.6% (389 of 3,657 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.56 · 4.0% (147 of 3,657 decks)
- Sanctum of Ugin relevance 0.70 · 2.6% (94 of 3,657 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.47 · 5.0% (184 of 3,657 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 9.5% (347 of 3,657 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.33 · 15.6% (570 of 3,657 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (263 of 3,657 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (155 of 3,657 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.34 · 11.1% (405 of 3,657 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (446 of 3,657 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.26 · 28.1% (1,027 of 3,657 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (914 of 3,657 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (210 of 3,657 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.46 · 3.4% (123 of 3,657 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.31 · 10.4% (382 of 3,657 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (287 of 3,657 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (120 of 3,657 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (98 of 3,657 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (104 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (92 of 3,657 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 49.8% (1,822 of 3,657 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (216 of 3,657 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (159 of 3,657 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (106 of 3,657 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 25.9% (948 of 3,657 decks)
Lands
21
Lands
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
All lands (21)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.33 · 59.5% (2,177 of 3,657 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.64 · 6.5% (238 of 3,657 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.57 · 6.8% (250 of 3,657 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.40 · 29.3% (1,070 of 3,657 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.44 · 10.8% (394 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (200 of 3,657 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.50 · 4.5% (163 of 3,657 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.45 · 6.0% (219 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (196 of 3,657 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.45 · 5.4% (196 of 3,657 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.41 · 9.2% (337 of 3,657 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (362 of 3,657 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (346 of 3,657 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (309 of 3,657 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.37 · 12.4% (453 of 3,657 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (142 of 3,657 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (213 of 3,657 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (221 of 3,657 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (158 of 3,657 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (219 of 3,657 decks)
- Island relevance 0.03 · 90.4% (3,307 of 3,657 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor, from 3,657 real Commander decks.