Change per day
Archetypes
96% of decks lean toward it
53% of decks lean toward it
44% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Soul of the Harvest
96% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant
53% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Ruric Thar, the Unbowed
44% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Garruk's Packleader
18% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Magus of the Candelabra
15% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 300 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Gruul decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Beast Whisperer
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Augur of Autumn
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Realmwalker
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
9.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Gruul decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Samut, Vizier of Naktamun, Ohran Viper, Oakhame Adversary
Cards like Farhaven Elf
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 50%
- Topiary Stomper 40%
- Simulacrum Shaper 5%
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru 4%
- Primeval Herald 3%
- Yavimaya Granger 2%
Other options: Wild Wanderer, Ondu Giant, Quirion Trailblazer
Cards like Reclamation Sage
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Gruul decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Frenzied Baloth
18× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Gruul decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Gruul decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 57%
- Elvish Mystic 48%
- Fyndhorn Elves 25%
- Boreal Druid 4%
- Llanowar Tribe 3%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Goobbue Gardener, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Rootrider Faun, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
15× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Earthshaker Giant, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Gruul Ragebeast
11× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Gruul Ragebeast 37%
- Apex Altisaur 13%
- Thorn Mammoth 12%
Other options: Pheres-Band Brawler, Scab-Clan Giant, Affectionate Indrik, Somberwald Stag, Atzocan Archer
Cards like Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
5.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Malamet Brawler, Fangren Pathcutter, Eel-Hounds, Master Symmetrist
Cards like Somberwald Sage
13× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Voyaging Satyr
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Voyaging Satyr 33%
- Argothian Elder 4%
- Krosan Restorer 3%
- Portent Tracker 3%
- Ley Weaver 2%
- Blossom Dryad 1%
Other options: Hope Tender, Ley Druid, Juniper Order Druid
Cards like Eternal Witness
6.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Gruul decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Nylea, Keen-Eyed
11× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Dawnglade Regent
7.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Dawnglade Regent 19%
- Regal Behemoth 10%
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
6.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Loot, Exuberant Explorer
2.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Selvala, Heart of the Wilds
3.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Gruul decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
1.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
5.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Gruul decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Apex Devastator
1.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Other options: Boarding Party
All top picks (50)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.64 · 77.6% (1,414 of 1,821 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.81 · 51.1% (930 of 1,821 decks)
- Nullstone Gargoyle relevance 0.94 · 36.2% (660 of 1,821 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.72 · 61.4% (1,119 of 1,821 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.71 · 55.6% (1,013 of 1,821 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 70.7% (1,287 of 1,821 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.85 · 31.8% (579 of 1,821 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.58 · 68.5% (1,247 of 1,821 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.70 · 49.5% (902 of 1,821 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.80 · 32.9% (600 of 1,821 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.61 · 58.9% (1,072 of 1,821 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 57.8% (1,053 of 1,821 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.65 · 50.3% (916 of 1,821 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.66 · 46.8% (852 of 1,821 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.76 · 32.5% (592 of 1,821 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.71 · 36.6% (667 of 1,821 decks)
- Urabrask the Hidden relevance 0.58 · 55.4% (1,009 of 1,821 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.76 · 27.3% (497 of 1,821 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.65 · 40.0% (728 of 1,821 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (496 of 1,821 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.65 · 35.4% (645 of 1,821 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.54 · 53.9% (982 of 1,821 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.53 · 55.5% (1,011 of 1,821 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.53 · 55.7% (1,015 of 1,821 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.57 · 47.5% (865 of 1,821 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (356 of 1,821 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.70 · 27.1% (494 of 1,821 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.74 · 21.5% (391 of 1,821 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.51 · 56.6% (1,030 of 1,821 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (458 of 1,821 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 0.61 · 38.3% (698 of 1,821 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.55 · 48.4% (882 of 1,821 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.71 · 22.3% (406 of 1,821 decks)
- Ogre Battledriver relevance 0.66 · 28.3% (515 of 1,821 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.57 · 42.0% (764 of 1,821 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.60 · 36.8% (670 of 1,821 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.55 · 44.6% (812 of 1,821 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 76.7% (1,397 of 1,821 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.45 · 63.6% (1,159 of 1,821 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (420 of 1,821 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.59 · 36.1% (657 of 1,821 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.81 · 10.5% (191 of 1,821 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.81 · 10.4% (189 of 1,821 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.58 · 36.5% (665 of 1,821 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.55 · 39.3% (715 of 1,821 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.65 · 23.0% (418 of 1,821 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (344 of 1,821 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.55 · 37.1% (676 of 1,821 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.61 · 26.7% (486 of 1,821 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (320 of 1,821 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.64 · 77.6% (1,414 of 1,821 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.81 · 51.1% (930 of 1,821 decks)
- Nullstone Gargoyle relevance 0.94 · 36.2% (660 of 1,821 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.72 · 61.4% (1,119 of 1,821 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.71 · 55.6% (1,013 of 1,821 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.58 · 70.7% (1,287 of 1,821 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.85 · 31.8% (579 of 1,821 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.58 · 68.5% (1,247 of 1,821 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.70 · 49.5% (902 of 1,821 decks)
- Voyaging Satyr relevance 0.80 · 32.9% (600 of 1,821 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.61 · 58.9% (1,072 of 1,821 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.62 · 57.8% (1,053 of 1,821 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.65 · 50.3% (916 of 1,821 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.66 · 46.8% (852 of 1,821 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.76 · 32.5% (592 of 1,821 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.71 · 36.6% (667 of 1,821 decks)
- Urabrask the Hidden relevance 0.58 · 55.4% (1,009 of 1,821 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.76 · 27.3% (497 of 1,821 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.65 · 40.0% (728 of 1,821 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (496 of 1,821 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.65 · 35.4% (645 of 1,821 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.54 · 53.9% (982 of 1,821 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.53 · 55.5% (1,011 of 1,821 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.53 · 55.7% (1,015 of 1,821 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.57 · 47.5% (865 of 1,821 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.76 · 19.5% (356 of 1,821 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.70 · 27.1% (494 of 1,821 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.74 · 21.5% (391 of 1,821 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.51 · 56.6% (1,030 of 1,821 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 0.61 · 38.3% (698 of 1,821 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.55 · 48.4% (882 of 1,821 decks)
- Sunder Shaman relevance 0.71 · 22.3% (406 of 1,821 decks)
- Ogre Battledriver relevance 0.66 · 28.3% (515 of 1,821 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.57 · 42.0% (764 of 1,821 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.60 · 36.8% (670 of 1,821 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.55 · 44.6% (812 of 1,821 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.39 · 76.7% (1,397 of 1,821 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.45 · 63.6% (1,159 of 1,821 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (420 of 1,821 decks)
- Cactusfolk Sureshot relevance 0.59 · 36.1% (657 of 1,821 decks)
- Yavimaya Dryad relevance 0.81 · 10.5% (191 of 1,821 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.81 · 10.4% (189 of 1,821 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.58 · 36.5% (665 of 1,821 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.55 · 39.3% (715 of 1,821 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.65 · 23.0% (418 of 1,821 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (344 of 1,821 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.55 · 37.1% (676 of 1,821 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.61 · 26.7% (486 of 1,821 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (320 of 1,821 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.56 · 32.0% (583 of 1,821 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 11.8% (215 of 1,821 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 3.3% (60 of 1,821 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (4)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.52 · 7.0% (127 of 1,821 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (79 of 1,821 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.15 · 13.7% (249 of 1,821 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.12 · 8.5% (155 of 1,821 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.71 · 25.2% (458 of 1,821 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (53 of 1,821 decks)
All utility lands (35)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.48 · 25.5% (465 of 1,821 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.43 · 32.6% (594 of 1,821 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.69 · 4.1% (74 of 1,821 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.42 · 19.7% (358 of 1,821 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.52 · 6.3% (115 of 1,821 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (244 of 1,821 decks)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.38 · 22.1% (403 of 1,821 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.48 · 8.2% (149 of 1,821 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.45 · 10.8% (196 of 1,821 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.50 · 6.5% (118 of 1,821 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.35 · 24.9% (453 of 1,821 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.37 · 15.2% (276 of 1,821 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.34 · 22.4% (407 of 1,821 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.25 · 49.3% (898 of 1,821 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.53 · 3.8% (69 of 1,821 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (52 of 1,821 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.24 · 37.7% (686 of 1,821 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (120 of 1,821 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (83 of 1,821 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.36 · 6.0% (110 of 1,821 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.20 · 49.3% (898 of 1,821 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 21.5% (391 of 1,821 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.25 · 21.0% (383 of 1,821 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.46 · 3.1% (56 of 1,821 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 18.3% (334 of 1,821 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.25 · 16.1% (293 of 1,821 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (47 of 1,821 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.22 · 26.4% (480 of 1,821 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.22 · 19.1% (347 of 1,821 decks)
- Castle Embereth relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (56 of 1,821 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (74 of 1,821 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (90 of 1,821 decks)
- Restless Ridgeline relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (57 of 1,821 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (47 of 1,821 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (60 of 1,821 decks)
All lands (41)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.83 · 31.0% (564 of 1,821 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.52 · 14.1% (257 of 1,821 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (190 of 1,821 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (216 of 1,821 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (131 of 1,821 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.38 · 8.0% (145 of 1,821 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (100 of 1,821 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.27 · 21.7% (395 of 1,821 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (387 of 1,821 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (188 of 1,821 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.23 · 27.3% (497 of 1,821 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.28 · 12.0% (219 of 1,821 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.20 · 35.1% (640 of 1,821 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (136 of 1,821 decks)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (118 of 1,821 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (59 of 1,821 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.17 · 47.3% (861 of 1,821 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (181 of 1,821 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 15.4% (281 of 1,821 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.18 · 38.6% (703 of 1,821 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (195 of 1,821 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.20 · 25.6% (467 of 1,821 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.23 · 11.1% (203 of 1,821 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.16 · 42.2% (769 of 1,821 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.21 · 15.0% (274 of 1,821 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.18 · 24.4% (444 of 1,821 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (79 of 1,821 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (81 of 1,821 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (75 of 1,821 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.15 · 37.3% (680 of 1,821 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (64 of 1,821 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.13 · 48.9% (890 of 1,821 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.11 · 61.5% (1,120 of 1,821 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (69 of 1,821 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (67 of 1,821 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (61 of 1,821 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (64 of 1,821 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.09 · 65.6% (1,194 of 1,821 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 73.5% (1,338 of 1,821 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.02 · 90.3% (1,644 of 1,821 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 91.6% (1,668 of 1,821 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Nikya of the Old Ways, from 1,821 real Commander decks.