Null Rod
Played in 190 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.7% Simic
-
Green 999 · 14.4%
-
Dimir 819 · 11.8%
-
Selesnya 662 · 9.5%
-
Abzan 457 · 6.6%
-
White 400 · 5.8%
-
Bant 358 · 5.2%
-
Gruul 341 · 4.9%
-
Naya 332 · 4.8%
-
Golgari 294 · 4.2%
-
Five-Color 222 · 3.2%
-
Red 191 · 2.8%
-
Simic 190 · 2.7%
-
Black 179 · 2.6%
-
Azorius 172 · 2.5%
-
Boros 144 · 2.1%
-
Esper 140 · 2.0%
-
Jund 140 · 2.0%
- Other (15) 895 · 12.9%
530+8+2+5+13+8+2+12+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 2.58 · 2.9% (46 of 1,577 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.87 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.78 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.55 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.53 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 3.94 · 81.1% (154 of 190 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.50 · 30.5% (58 of 190 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 1.48 · 54.2% (103 of 190 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 1.45 · 37.9% (72 of 190 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.45 · 58.4% (111 of 190 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.44 · 60.5% (115 of 190 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.38 · 34.2% (65 of 190 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.35 · 35.8% (68 of 190 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 1.34 · 32.6% (62 of 190 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.34 · 60.0% (114 of 190 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.33 · 31.1% (59 of 190 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.32 · 66.3% (126 of 190 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.30 · 44.2% (84 of 190 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.28 · 46.3% (88 of 190 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 1.26 · 50.5% (96 of 190 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.25 · 42.1% (80 of 190 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 1.22 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.21 · 64.2% (122 of 190 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 1.19 · 55.8% (106 of 190 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.17 · 46.3% (88 of 190 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 35.3% (67 of 190 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.13 · 44.7% (85 of 190 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.12 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.12 · 26.8% (51 of 190 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 1.12 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.11 · 54.7% (104 of 190 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.10 · 37.9% (72 of 190 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 1.08 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (67 of 190 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 1.08 · 62.6% (119 of 190 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 3.94 · 81.1% (154 of 190 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.35 · 35.8% (68 of 190 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 1.19 · 55.8% (106 of 190 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.12 · 26.8% (51 of 190 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.11 · 54.7% (104 of 190 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.10 · 37.9% (72 of 190 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 1.08 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 1.05 · 32.1% (61 of 190 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Chrome Mox relevance 1.28 · 46.3% (88 of 190 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 1.25 · 42.1% (80 of 190 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 1.45 · 37.9% (72 of 190 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 1.32 · 66.3% (126 of 190 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 1.26 · 50.5% (96 of 190 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 1.12 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 1.08 · 62.6% (119 of 190 decks)
All instants (13)
- Flusterstorm relevance 1.48 · 54.2% (103 of 190 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.44 · 60.5% (115 of 190 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.34 · 60.0% (114 of 190 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.30 · 44.2% (84 of 190 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.21 · 64.2% (122 of 190 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.17 · 46.3% (88 of 190 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 35.3% (67 of 190 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.13 · 44.7% (85 of 190 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 1.12 · 28.9% (55 of 190 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 1.08 · 35.3% (67 of 190 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 1.06 · 65.8% (125 of 190 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 1.05 · 51.6% (98 of 190 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.99 · 36.3% (69 of 190 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.50 · 30.5% (58 of 190 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 1.45 · 58.4% (111 of 190 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 1.38 · 34.2% (65 of 190 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 1.34 · 32.6% (62 of 190 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.33 · 31.1% (59 of 190 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 1.22 · 22.6% (43 of 190 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.05 · 24.7% (47 of 190 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.00 · 21.1% (40 of 190 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 1.19 · 68.9% (131 of 190 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 1.19 · 76.3% (145 of 190 decks)
All lands (12)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 1.72 · 70.0% (133 of 190 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 1.69 · 61.6% (117 of 190 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 1.64 · 67.4% (128 of 190 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 1.61 · 72.1% (137 of 190 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 1.56 · 67.4% (128 of 190 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 1.50 · 65.3% (124 of 190 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 1.46 · 60.5% (115 of 190 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 1.41 · 56.8% (108 of 190 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 1.32 · 67.4% (128 of 190 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 1.22 · 43.7% (83 of 190 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 1.21 · 43.2% (82 of 190 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 1.05 · 83.7% (159 of 190 decks)
EDH data for Null Rod: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 190 real decks.



























































