Psychic Pickpocket
Played in 135 Blue decks
1630+30+4+6+3+4+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
19.9% Blue
Commanders
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 30.7% of decks
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 30.7% of decks
Leader, Super-Genius 29.1% of decks
Leader, Super-Genius 29.1% of decks
Llawan, Cephalid Empress 2.8% of decks
Llawan, Cephalid Empress 2.8% of decks
Callaphe, Beloved of the Sea 1.2% of decks
Callaphe, Beloved of the Sea 1.2% of decks
Lyla, Holographic Assistant 1.5% of decks
Lyla, Holographic Assistant 1.5% of decks
Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager 2.1% of decks
Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager 2.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Cephalid Looter 45.9% of decks
Cephalid Looter 45.9% of decks
Cephalid Broker 45.2% of decks
Cephalid Broker 45.2% of decks
Cephalid Pathmage 37.0% of decks
Cephalid Pathmage 37.0% of decks
Shield Broker 43.0% of decks
Shield Broker 43.0% of decks
Cephalid Constable 44.4% of decks
Cephalid Constable 44.4% of decks
Callous Oppressor 38.5% of decks
Callous Oppressor 38.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (16)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 4.44 · 30.7% (50 of 163 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 3.17 · 29.1% (16 of 55 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.10 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Callaphe, Beloved of the Sea relevance 0.85 · 1.2% (4 of 333 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.79 · 1.5% (3 of 202 decks)
- Silver Surfer, Cosmic Voyager relevance 0.69 · 2.1% (2 of 95 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.58 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.55 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.53 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Yuriko, Hope from the Shadows relevance 0.44 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 2.88 · 45.9% (62 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.62 · 45.2% (61 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 2.48 · 37.0% (50 of 135 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.41 · 43.0% (58 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.19 · 44.4% (60 of 135 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.12 · 38.5% (52 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.11 · 34.1% (46 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.04 · 41.5% (56 of 135 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.96 · 37.0% (50 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.93 · 34.1% (46 of 135 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.57 · 25.9% (35 of 135 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.52 · 35.6% (48 of 135 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.52 · 25.9% (35 of 135 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.38 · 25.2% (34 of 135 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.37 · 40.0% (54 of 135 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.32 · 27.4% (37 of 135 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.27 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.23 · 39.3% (53 of 135 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.09 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.99 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.99 · 20.7% (28 of 135 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.97 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.94 · 18.5% (25 of 135 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.91 · 29.6% (40 of 135 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.90 · 16.3% (22 of 135 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.89 · 15.6% (21 of 135 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.88 · 17.0% (23 of 135 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.88 · 15.6% (21 of 135 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.87 · 14.1% (19 of 135 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.87 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 2.88 · 45.9% (62 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.62 · 45.2% (61 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 2.48 · 37.0% (50 of 135 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.41 · 43.0% (58 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 2.19 · 44.4% (60 of 135 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 2.12 · 38.5% (52 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 2.11 · 34.1% (46 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.04 · 41.5% (56 of 135 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.96 · 37.0% (50 of 135 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.93 · 34.1% (46 of 135 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.38 · 25.2% (34 of 135 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.37 · 40.0% (54 of 135 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.27 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.23 · 39.3% (53 of 135 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.99 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.99 · 20.7% (28 of 135 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.97 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.89 · 15.6% (21 of 135 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.88 · 15.6% (21 of 135 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.87 · 14.1% (19 of 135 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.84 · 16.3% (22 of 135 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.80 · 12.6% (17 of 135 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.80 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
- Doc Ock's Henchmen relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (15 of 135 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.56 · 8.9% (12 of 135 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.55 · 10.4% (14 of 135 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.53 · 12.6% (17 of 135 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.49 · 9.6% (13 of 135 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (14 of 135 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (15 of 135 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.91 · 29.6% (40 of 135 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.90 · 16.3% (22 of 135 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.77 · 12.6% (17 of 135 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.53 · 31.1% (42 of 135 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 1.57 · 25.9% (35 of 135 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.52 · 35.6% (48 of 135 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.09 · 19.3% (26 of 135 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.94 · 18.5% (25 of 135 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.88 · 17.0% (23 of 135 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.85 · 18.5% (25 of 135 decks)
All instants (3)
- Deluge relevance 0.60 · 11.1% (15 of 135 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (13 of 135 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (13 of 135 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 1.52 · 25.9% (35 of 135 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.32 · 27.4% (37 of 135 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.87 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.73 · 23.0% (31 of 135 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.52 · 11.9% (16 of 135 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.59 · 24.4% (33 of 135 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (22 of 135 decks)
EDH data for Psychic Pickpocket: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 135 real decks.











































