Living Inferno
Played in 68 Red decks
Color Identity Spread
20.7% Red
430+42+6+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Purphoros, Bronze-Blooded relevance 2.14 · 2.3% (13 of 568 decks)
- Arni Brokenbrow relevance 1.08 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.58 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Rakka Mar relevance 0.47 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Meteor Golem relevance 1.57 · 52.9% (36 of 68 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.31 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Chaos Maw relevance 1.30 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.30 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Bloodfire Colossus relevance 1.28 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.17 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Myojin of Roaring Blades relevance 1.13 · 27.9% (19 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 1.09 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 1.00 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 1.00 · 45.6% (31 of 68 decks)
- Dragon Mage relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.98 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.95 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Ruin Grinder relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Industrial Advancement relevance 0.93 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Bogardan Hellkite relevance 0.91 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.90 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Avatar of Slaughter relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.87 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Magmatic Force relevance 0.87 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Ingenuity Engine relevance 0.82 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Knollspine Dragon relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.81 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Meteor Golem relevance 1.57 · 52.9% (36 of 68 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.31 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Chaos Maw relevance 1.30 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.30 · 51.5% (35 of 68 decks)
- Bloodfire Colossus relevance 1.28 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.17 · 32.4% (22 of 68 decks)
- Myojin of Roaring Blades relevance 1.13 · 27.9% (19 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 1.09 · 30.9% (21 of 68 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Molten Primordial relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 1.00 · 45.6% (31 of 68 decks)
- Dragon Mage relevance 1.00 · 29.4% (20 of 68 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.98 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.95 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Ruin Grinder relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Bogardan Hellkite relevance 0.91 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.90 · 35.3% (24 of 68 decks)
- Avatar of Slaughter relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.87 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Magmatic Force relevance 0.87 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Rampaging War Mammoth relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Knollspine Dragon relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.81 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
- Firbolg Flutist relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 0.77 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Clive, Ifrit's Dominant // Ifrit, Warden of Inferno relevance 0.76 · 27.9% (19 of 68 decks)
- Stalking Vengeance relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.73 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Tyrant of Discord relevance 0.72 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Overlord of the Boilerbilges relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.71 · 38.2% (26 of 68 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.70 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
- Scourge of the Throne relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Hoarding Dragon relevance 0.69 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.68 · 22.1% (15 of 68 decks)
- Herigast, Erupting Nullkite relevance 0.66 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Worldgorger Dragon relevance 0.65 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Magus of the Wheel relevance 0.64 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Skitterbeam Battalion relevance 0.63 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.63 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 1.00 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.93 · 26.5% (18 of 68 decks)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (17 of 68 decks)
- Ingenuity Engine relevance 0.82 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.62 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.60 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Industrial Advancement relevance 0.93 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
All instants (1)
- Fling relevance 0.70 · 20.6% (14 of 68 decks)
EDH data for Living Inferno: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 68 real decks.
































