Living Inferno
Played in 36 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
11.0% Gruul
All commanders (1)
- Tuknir Deathlock relevance 0.73 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (11)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.68 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.67 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.42 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.36 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.38 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.35 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.51 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
EDH data for Living Inferno: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 36 real decks.