Living Inferno
Played in 87 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
26.5% Five-Color
130+48+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Horde of Notions relevance 2.68 · 1.5% (25 of 1,616 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.92 · 72.4% (63 of 87 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.83 · 54.0% (47 of 87 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.72 · 67.8% (59 of 87 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.64 · 55.2% (48 of 87 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.61 · 70.1% (61 of 87 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.58 · 67.8% (59 of 87 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 1.56 · 23.0% (20 of 87 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.55 · 35.6% (31 of 87 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.54 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.52 · 57.5% (50 of 87 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (37 of 87 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.48 · 56.3% (49 of 87 decks)
- Shroudstomper relevance 1.47 · 36.8% (32 of 87 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 1.39 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 1.38 · 43.7% (38 of 87 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.36 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.36 · 54.0% (47 of 87 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 1.36 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Tyrant of Discord relevance 1.35 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.35 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 1.35 · 34.5% (30 of 87 decks)
- Interdisciplinary Mascot relevance 1.34 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 1.31 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Lamentation relevance 1.31 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 1.30 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.29 · 44.8% (39 of 87 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.26 · 18.4% (16 of 87 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.25 · 50.6% (44 of 87 decks)
- Fury relevance 1.23 · 44.8% (39 of 87 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.23 · 20.7% (18 of 87 decks)
All creatures (48)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.92 · 72.4% (63 of 87 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.83 · 54.0% (47 of 87 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 1.72 · 67.8% (59 of 87 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.64 · 55.2% (48 of 87 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.61 · 70.1% (61 of 87 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.58 · 67.8% (59 of 87 decks)
- Faultgrinder relevance 1.56 · 23.0% (20 of 87 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.55 · 35.6% (31 of 87 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 1.54 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 1.52 · 57.5% (50 of 87 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (37 of 87 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.48 · 56.3% (49 of 87 decks)
- Shroudstomper relevance 1.47 · 36.8% (32 of 87 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 1.39 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 1.38 · 43.7% (38 of 87 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.36 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.36 · 54.0% (47 of 87 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 1.36 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Tyrant of Discord relevance 1.35 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 1.35 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Grave Sifter relevance 1.35 · 34.5% (30 of 87 decks)
- Interdisciplinary Mascot relevance 1.34 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 1.31 · 49.4% (43 of 87 decks)
- Lamentation relevance 1.31 · 48.3% (42 of 87 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 1.30 · 26.4% (23 of 87 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.29 · 44.8% (39 of 87 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.26 · 18.4% (16 of 87 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.25 · 50.6% (44 of 87 decks)
- Fury relevance 1.23 · 44.8% (39 of 87 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 1.23 · 20.7% (18 of 87 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.18 · 46.0% (40 of 87 decks)
- Impulsivity relevance 1.16 · 39.1% (34 of 87 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 1.16 · 37.9% (33 of 87 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.13 · 41.4% (36 of 87 decks)
- Solitude relevance 1.12 · 28.7% (25 of 87 decks)
- Rottenmouth Viper relevance 1.12 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Tornado Elemental relevance 1.09 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 1.09 · 34.5% (30 of 87 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 1.02 · 35.6% (31 of 87 decks)
- Shinestriker relevance 1.02 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.01 · 19.5% (17 of 87 decks)
- Ingot Chewer relevance 1.01 · 32.2% (28 of 87 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 1.01 · 23.0% (20 of 87 decks)
- Mass of Mysteries relevance 1.01 · 35.6% (31 of 87 decks)
- Nova Chaser relevance 1.01 · 14.9% (13 of 87 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 1.00 · 16.1% (14 of 87 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.98 · 27.6% (24 of 87 decks)
- Cavalier of Night relevance 0.97 · 21.8% (19 of 87 decks)
All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.07 · 29.9% (26 of 87 decks)
All lands (1)
- Primal Beyond relevance 1.24 · 44.8% (39 of 87 decks)
EDH data for Living Inferno: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 87 real decks.























