Living Inferno
Played in 28 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
8.6% Naya
All most relevant (10)
- Terastodon relevance 1.78 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.67 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 1.53 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.24 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 1.24 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.21 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.44 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Terastodon relevance 1.78 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.67 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Blazing Archon relevance 1.53 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 1.24 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 1.24 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 1.21 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Palani's Hatcher relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.44 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.53 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Living Inferno: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.