Coiling Woodworm
Played in 145 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
28.9% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (11)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 1.52 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.04 · 3.8% (3 of 78 decks)
- Reptil, Dinomorpher relevance 1.01 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.80 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.59 · 1.2% (2 of 170 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.42 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.40 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.38 · 1.3% (1 of 79 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.78 · 49.7% (72 of 145 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.68 · 38.6% (56 of 145 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.64 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.37 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 1.25 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.25 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.01 · 43.4% (63 of 145 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 1.00 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.86 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.79 · 24.1% (35 of 145 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.77 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.73 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.70 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.69 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Timbermaw Larva relevance 0.66 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.62 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.58 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 1.78 · 49.7% (72 of 145 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 1.68 · 38.6% (56 of 145 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 1.64 · 25.5% (37 of 145 decks)
- Dauntless Dourbark relevance 1.37 · 28.3% (41 of 145 decks)
- Traproot Kami relevance 1.25 · 22.1% (32 of 145 decks)
- Treefolk Seedlings relevance 1.25 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 1.00 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.86 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.83 · 16.6% (24 of 145 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.79 · 24.1% (35 of 145 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.77 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.73 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Timbermaw Larva relevance 0.66 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Nessian Game Warden relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.62 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.62 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.58 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.53 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.50 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.49 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Village Elder relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (11 of 145 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.48 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.47 · 23.4% (34 of 145 decks)
- Allosaurus Rider relevance 0.47 · 8.3% (12 of 145 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.46 · 10.3% (15 of 145 decks)
- Mirkwood Channeler relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (13 of 145 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.57 · 20.0% (29 of 145 decks)
- Staff of the Wild Magus relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 1.01 · 43.4% (63 of 145 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.83 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.75 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.48 · 17.2% (25 of 145 decks)
All instants (1)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.85 · 15.9% (23 of 145 decks)
- Fruition relevance 0.70 · 11.0% (16 of 145 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.69 · 15.2% (22 of 145 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.57 · 13.1% (19 of 145 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.57 · 19.3% (28 of 145 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.52 · 9.7% (14 of 145 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (17 of 145 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (18 of 145 decks)
All planeswalkers (4)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.62 · 14.5% (21 of 145 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 29.7% (43 of 145 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (30 of 145 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (20 of 145 decks)
EDH data for Coiling Woodworm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 145 real decks.