Change per day
Archetypes
83% of decks lean toward it
63% of decks lean toward it
53% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Nissa, Who Shakes the World
83% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Early Harvest
63% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Abundance
53% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Ramunap Excavator
38% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Embodiment of Insight
35% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Vitalize
27% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Aftermath Analyst
23% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Timber Protector
22% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Badgermole Cub
20% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 60 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Sylvan Advocate
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Sylvan Advocate 50%
- Earth Surge 39%
Cards like Vitalize
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
19× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 64% of other green decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 47% of other green decks
2.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.6 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 55%
- Rampant Growth 54%
- Kodama's Reach 48%
- Harvest Season 42%
- Boundless Realms 38%
- Explosive Vegetation 13%
- Migration Path 8%
- Reshape the Earth 7%
- Search for Tomorrow 6%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Traverse the Outlands 3%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
- Deep Reconnaissance 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Grow from the Ashes, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Slimefoot's Survey, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 43%
- Skyshroud Claim 41%
- Three Visits 39%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 26%
- Hunting Wilds 4%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Field Trip
Cards like Horn of Greed
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Horn of Greed 28%
- Seer's Sundial 18%
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 42%
- Roiling Regrowth 15%
- Entish Restoration 12%
- Planar Engineering 9%
- Scapeshift 4%
- Cycle of Renewal 2%
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
8.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oakhame Adversary
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overrun
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Wood Elves
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 18%
- Moment's Peace 8%
- Lull 2%
- Winds of Qal Sisma 2%
- Terrifying Presence 1%
Other options: Hunter's Ambush, Thwart the Enemy, Hindervines, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Root Snare, Serene Sunset, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare
Cards like Explore
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Explore 29%
- Summer Bloom 8%
- Journey of Discovery 6%
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 26%
- Swiftfoot Boots 22%
Cards like Nature's Revolt
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
3.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Allosaurus Rider, Flora Colossus, Mirkwood Pathmaker
All top picks (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.70 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.58 · 50.0% (85 of 170 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.59 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.63 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.52 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.49 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 36.5% (62 of 170 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.49 · 31.2% (53 of 170 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.39 · 51.2% (87 of 170 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.42 · 41.8% (71 of 170 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.43 · 38.2% (65 of 170 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.43 · 37.1% (63 of 170 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (53 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.47 · 27.6% (47 of 170 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.47 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.46 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.44 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.41 · 25.9% (44 of 170 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.40 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.35 · 40.0% (68 of 170 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.40 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.39 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.28 · 55.9% (95 of 170 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.37 · 27.6% (47 of 170 decks)
- Echoing Courage relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.37 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Powder Keg relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.28 · 35.3% (60 of 170 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.31 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.32 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.29 · 28.8% (49 of 170 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.26 · 35.9% (61 of 170 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.58 · 50.0% (85 of 170 decks)
- Llanowar Druid relevance 0.52 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.43 · 37.1% (63 of 170 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (53 of 170 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.47 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.41 · 25.9% (44 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.28 · 35.3% (60 of 170 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.31 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.26 · 35.9% (61 of 170 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.27 · 32.9% (56 of 170 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.23 · 45.9% (78 of 170 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.28 · 22.9% (39 of 170 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.21 · 38.8% (66 of 170 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.21 · 29.4% (50 of 170 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.23 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Genesis relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.18 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.23 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.21 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Verdant Kraken relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.22 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.19 · 25.9% (44 of 170 decks)
- Silverglade Pathfinder relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.18 · 27.1% (46 of 170 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.19 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Thelonite Druid relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
All artifacts (46)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.63 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.44 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.47 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.37 · 27.6% (47 of 170 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.37 · 17.6% (30 of 170 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Powder Keg relevance 0.47 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.40 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.37 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.26 · 24.7% (42 of 170 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (32 of 170 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Otherworld Atlas relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.15 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 22.9% (39 of 170 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.08 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 37.6% (64 of 170 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.70 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.46 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.38 · 28.2% (48 of 170 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.43 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.34 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.29 · 28.8% (49 of 170 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.30 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Primal Order relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Epic Struggle relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.24 · 30.6% (52 of 170 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.34 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.26 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.25 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 34.7% (59 of 170 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.25 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.27 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Verdant Succession relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Cyclone relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Living Plane relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Choke relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.17 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.17 · 11.2% (19 of 170 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
All instants (50)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.59 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.48 · 36.5% (62 of 170 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.39 · 51.2% (87 of 170 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.47 · 27.6% (47 of 170 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.40 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.39 · 22.4% (38 of 170 decks)
- Echoing Courage relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.32 · 21.2% (36 of 170 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.20 · 42.4% (72 of 170 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 15.3% (26 of 170 decks)
- Snag relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.20 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.18 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.16 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Vitalizing Wind relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (21 of 170 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 31.2% (53 of 170 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.09 · 48.8% (83 of 170 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.12 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.07 · 48.2% (82 of 170 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.12 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.49 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.49 · 31.2% (53 of 170 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.42 · 41.8% (71 of 170 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.43 · 38.2% (65 of 170 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.46 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.40 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.35 · 40.0% (68 of 170 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.28 · 55.9% (95 of 170 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.29 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 58.2% (99 of 170 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.34 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.29 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.28 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.28 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.20 · 40.6% (69 of 170 decks)
- Clear the Land relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.25 · 12.9% (22 of 170 decks)
- Revive relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.24 · 15.9% (27 of 170 decks)
- Creeping Corrosion relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.22 · 18.2% (31 of 170 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (13 of 170 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 43.5% (74 of 170 decks)
- Wave of Vitriol relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Tsunami relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.21 · 16.5% (28 of 170 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.17 · 29.4% (50 of 170 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 47.6% (81 of 170 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 39.4% (67 of 170 decks)
- New Frontiers relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (25 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.23 · 43.5% (74 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.27 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.22 · 19.4% (33 of 170 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.27 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (34 of 170 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 25.3% (43 of 170 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 26.5% (45 of 170 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (12 of 170 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (15 of 170 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Sea Gate Wreckage relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (16 of 170 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (10 of 170 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 21.8% (37 of 170 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 17.1% (29 of 170 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (7 of 170 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (11 of 170 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
All lands (24)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (20 of 170 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (8 of 170 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.16 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 10.6% (18 of 170 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (9 of 170 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (6 of 170 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (17 of 170 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 8.2% (14 of 170 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 14.1% (24 of 170 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 13.5% (23 of 170 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (5 of 170 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (4 of 170 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.5% (147 of 170 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jolrael, Empress of Beasts, from 170 real Commander decks.