Living Lands
Played in 98 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.9% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 2.67 · 2.5% (31 of 1,221 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 2.17 · 2.0% (19 of 948 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.41 · 1.3% (8 of 629 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 3.22 · 46.9% (46 of 98 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 2.32 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 2.25 · 51.0% (50 of 98 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 2.25 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 2.20 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.94 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.69 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.67 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.62 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 1.57 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.57 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.51 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 1.39 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 1.37 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 1.33 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 1.30 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.28 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 1.27 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.25 · 45.9% (45 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.22 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 1.21 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.21 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.17 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.11 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.06 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.06 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.05 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 2.32 · 56.1% (55 of 98 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.94 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.69 · 36.7% (36 of 98 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 1.67 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 1.62 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 1.39 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 1.37 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 1.33 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.28 · 38.8% (38 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 1.27 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.25 · 45.9% (45 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.22 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 1.21 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 1.17 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.95 · 21.4% (21 of 98 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.87 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.84 · 61.2% (60 of 98 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.76 · 13.3% (13 of 98 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.74 · 32.7% (32 of 98 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Titania relevance 1.30 · 25.5% (25 of 98 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.77 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 3.22 · 46.9% (46 of 98 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 1.57 · 27.6% (27 of 98 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.85 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
All instants (3)
- Natural Affinity relevance 2.25 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 2.20 · 44.9% (44 of 98 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 1.03 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 2.25 · 51.0% (50 of 98 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 1.51 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.11 · 35.7% (35 of 98 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 1.06 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.05 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
All planeswalkers (4)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 1.57 · 40.8% (40 of 98 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 1.21 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.06 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.92 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 1.13 · 31.6% (31 of 98 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 1.11 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 1.05 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 1.04 · 22.4% (22 of 98 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 1.03 · 29.6% (29 of 98 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 1.00 · 20.4% (20 of 98 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.97 · 19.4% (19 of 98 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.81 · 16.3% (16 of 98 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.81 · 15.3% (15 of 98 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (18 of 98 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.80 · 45.9% (45 of 98 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.79 · 17.3% (17 of 98 decks)
EDH data for Living Lands: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 98 real decks.