Living Lands
Played in 114 Golgari decks
230+18+5+6+3+10+1+4+3+
Color Identity Spread
6.9% Golgari
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nature's Revolt 36.0% of decks
Nature's Revolt 36.0% of decks
Life and Limb 38.6% of decks
Life and Limb 38.6% of decks
Natural Affinity 29.8% of decks
Natural Affinity 29.8% of decks
Sylvan Awakening 25.4% of decks
Sylvan Awakening 25.4% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 27.2% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 27.2% of decks
Kamahl's Will 21.9% of decks
Kamahl's Will 21.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.83 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.66 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 2.44 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.90 · 38.6% (44 of 114 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.83 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.52 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.51 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.37 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Life // Death relevance 0.83 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.78 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.65 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.61 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.56 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.51 · 35.1% (40 of 114 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.51 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.50 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.51 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.78 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.66 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.65 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (21 of 114 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.48 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (13 of 114 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Dread Presence relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (8 of 114 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.63 · 15.8% (18 of 114 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.49 · 20.2% (23 of 114 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.48 · 14.9% (17 of 114 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.46 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 2.44 · 36.0% (41 of 114 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.90 · 38.6% (44 of 114 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.61 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.51 · 10.5% (12 of 114 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
All instants (3)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.83 · 29.8% (34 of 114 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 1.37 · 21.9% (25 of 114 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (37 of 114 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.52 · 25.4% (29 of 114 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.96 · 16.7% (19 of 114 decks)
- Life // Death relevance 0.83 · 23.7% (27 of 114 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.5% (20 of 114 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.56 · 19.3% (22 of 114 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 28.9% (33 of 114 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.51 · 35.1% (40 of 114 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.51 · 28.1% (32 of 114 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.50 · 27.2% (31 of 114 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (11 of 114 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.65 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.77 · 54.4% (62 of 114 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.73 · 44.7% (51 of 114 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.49 · 12.3% (14 of 114 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.46 · 14.0% (16 of 114 decks)
All lands (3)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.45 · 34.2% (39 of 114 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (15 of 114 decks)
EDH data for Living Lands: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 114 real decks.


















































