Living Lands
Played in 52 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Jund
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.56 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.91 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.51 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.96 · 55.8% (29 of 52 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.94 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.90 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.76 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.76 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.67 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.63 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.62 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.60 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.59 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.58 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.56 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.56 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.55 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.55 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.50 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.76 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.76 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.67 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.60 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.57 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.57 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.56 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.55 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.55 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.50 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.49 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.48 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.47 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.46 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.62 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.91 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.59 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Dictate of Erebos relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
All instants (8)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.51 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.90 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.63 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.58 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.50 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.48 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.46 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.96 · 55.8% (29 of 52 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.94 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.56 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.47 · 82.7% (43 of 52 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.97 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.61 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.53 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.47 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
All lands (6)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.52 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.46 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.46 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
EDH data for Living Lands: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 52 real decks.