Cephalid Inkshrouder
Played in 155 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
6.7% Blue
All commanders (5)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.45 · 54.9% (89 of 162 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.58 · 4.9% (7 of 142 decks)
- Urza, Powerstone Prodigy relevance 0.81 · 1.2% (4 of 337 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Edgar, King of Figaro relevance 0.34 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.35 · 65.2% (101 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.25 · 67.7% (105 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.88 · 67.1% (104 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.55 · 57.4% (89 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.39 · 69.0% (107 of 155 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.30 · 60.0% (93 of 155 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.03 · 57.4% (89 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.85 · 50.3% (78 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.60 · 52.9% (82 of 155 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.53 · 43.2% (67 of 155 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.30 · 38.1% (59 of 155 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.17 · 38.7% (60 of 155 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.96 · 45.8% (71 of 155 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.81 · 37.4% (58 of 155 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.61 · 47.1% (73 of 155 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.57 · 27.7% (43 of 155 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.56 · 30.3% (47 of 155 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.54 · 29.7% (46 of 155 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.54 · 32.3% (50 of 155 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.45 · 28.4% (44 of 155 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.42 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.37 · 43.9% (68 of 155 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.35 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.29 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.28 · 22.6% (35 of 155 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.24 · 34.8% (54 of 155 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.24 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.17 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.15 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.12 · 34.2% (53 of 155 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.35 · 65.2% (101 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.25 · 67.7% (105 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 3.88 · 67.1% (104 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.55 · 57.4% (89 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.39 · 69.0% (107 of 155 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.30 · 60.0% (93 of 155 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.03 · 57.4% (89 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.85 · 50.3% (78 of 155 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.60 · 52.9% (82 of 155 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.17 · 38.7% (60 of 155 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.61 · 47.1% (73 of 155 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.56 · 30.3% (47 of 155 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.54 · 29.7% (46 of 155 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.54 · 32.3% (50 of 155 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.42 · 25.8% (40 of 155 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.37 · 43.9% (68 of 155 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.35 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.28 · 22.6% (35 of 155 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.17 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.15 · 18.1% (28 of 155 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.12 · 34.2% (53 of 155 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.04 · 16.8% (26 of 155 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.97 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (24 of 155 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.74 · 11.6% (18 of 155 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.72 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (16 of 155 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (19 of 155 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.29 · 23.2% (36 of 155 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.89 · 29.0% (45 of 155 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (21 of 155 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.30 · 38.1% (59 of 155 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.96 · 45.8% (71 of 155 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.57 · 27.7% (43 of 155 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.45 · 28.4% (44 of 155 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.24 · 23.9% (37 of 155 decks)
- Cowardice relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (20 of 155 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (29 of 155 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (24 of 155 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.60 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
All instants (3)
- Deluge relevance 0.76 · 14.2% (22 of 155 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.69 · 11.0% (17 of 155 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.57 · 14.8% (23 of 155 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.53 · 43.2% (67 of 155 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.81 · 37.4% (58 of 155 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.24 · 34.8% (54 of 155 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.86 · 27.1% (42 of 155 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.77 · 17.4% (27 of 155 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.00 · 41.9% (65 of 155 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Inkshrouder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 155 real decks.