Change the Equation
Played in 580 Blue decks
2330+1+1+48+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Blind Seer 7.3% of decks
Blind Seer 7.3% of decks
Baral, Chief of Compliance 3.3% of decks
Baral, Chief of Compliance 3.3% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 1.1% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 1.1% of decks
Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant 1.6% of decks
Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant 1.6% of decks
Atemsis, All-Seeing 1.7% of decks
Atemsis, All-Seeing 1.7% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, Librarian 1.3% of decks
Wan Shi Tong, Librarian 1.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Mana Leak 34.5% of decks
Mana Leak 34.5% of decks
Annul 22.8% of decks
Annul 22.8% of decks
Spell Snare 18.8% of decks
Spell Snare 18.8% of decks
Lose Focus 16.7% of decks
Lose Focus 16.7% of decks
Disdainful Stroke 25.3% of decks
Disdainful Stroke 25.3% of decks
Spell Pierce 32.6% of decks
Spell Pierce 32.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (23)
- Blind Seer relevance 2.13 · 7.3% (35 of 478 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 2.12 · 3.3% (107 of 3,250 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.95 · 1.1% (28 of 2,447 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.95 · 1.6% (16 of 986 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 0.90 · 1.7% (13 of 771 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.86 · 1.3% (17 of 1,352 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.82 · 1.6% (11 of 706 decks)
- Mondo Gecko relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (6 of 336 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.54 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.44 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- Katara, Bending Prodigy relevance 0.36 · 1.6% (2 of 127 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Faceless One relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.35 · 1.4% (2 of 142 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.34 · 1.4% (2 of 145 decks)
- Ixidor, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (2 of 170 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.30 · 1.1% (2 of 185 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.30 · 1.0% (2 of 193 decks)
- Kang the Conqueror relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 0.25 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.24 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Valeria Richards, Precocious relevance 0.22 · 1.4% (1 of 70 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.01 · 34.5% (200 of 580 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.84 · 22.8% (132 of 580 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (109 of 580 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (97 of 580 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.78 · 25.3% (147 of 580 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.78 · 32.6% (189 of 580 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.78 · 22.1% (128 of 580 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.77 · 15.3% (89 of 580 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.74 · 16.0% (93 of 580 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.73 · 19.7% (114 of 580 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (113 of 580 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (98 of 580 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.70 · 21.7% (126 of 580 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.68 · 26.2% (152 of 580 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (95 of 580 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (116 of 580 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (86 of 580 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.64 · 12.6% (73 of 580 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (112 of 580 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (87 of 580 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.58 · 16.7% (97 of 580 decks)
- Mystical Dispute relevance 0.57 · 11.2% (65 of 580 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (62 of 580 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.55 · 10.5% (61 of 580 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.54 · 9.8% (57 of 580 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.53 · 19.0% (110 of 580 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.53 · 23.8% (138 of 580 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (55 of 580 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (70 of 580 decks)
- Aether Gust relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (50 of 580 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Cerulean Drake relevance 0.46 · 8.3% (48 of 580 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Douse relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (44 of 580 decks)
All instants (48)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.01 · 34.5% (200 of 580 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.84 · 22.8% (132 of 580 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.80 · 18.8% (109 of 580 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.79 · 16.7% (97 of 580 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.78 · 25.3% (147 of 580 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.78 · 32.6% (189 of 580 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.78 · 22.1% (128 of 580 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.77 · 15.3% (89 of 580 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.74 · 16.0% (93 of 580 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.73 · 19.7% (114 of 580 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (113 of 580 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (98 of 580 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.70 · 21.7% (126 of 580 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.68 · 26.2% (152 of 580 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (95 of 580 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (116 of 580 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 0.64 · 14.8% (86 of 580 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.64 · 12.6% (73 of 580 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (112 of 580 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (87 of 580 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.58 · 16.7% (97 of 580 decks)
- Mystical Dispute relevance 0.57 · 11.2% (65 of 580 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (62 of 580 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.55 · 10.5% (61 of 580 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.54 · 9.8% (57 of 580 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.53 · 19.0% (110 of 580 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.53 · 23.8% (138 of 580 decks)
- Minor Misstep relevance 0.53 · 9.5% (55 of 580 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (70 of 580 decks)
- Aether Gust relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (50 of 580 decks)
- Assimilate Essence relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (48 of 580 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 0.50 · 10.9% (63 of 580 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.50 · 27.1% (157 of 580 decks)
- Flashfreeze relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (47 of 580 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (52 of 580 decks)
- Anticognition relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (53 of 580 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.46 · 21.7% (126 of 580 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.46 · 9.0% (52 of 580 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (62 of 580 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (56 of 580 decks)
- Hibernation relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (44 of 580 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (104 of 580 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.42 · 16.2% (94 of 580 decks)
- Flash Flood relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (42 of 580 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.42 · 27.8% (161 of 580 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.42 · 15.7% (91 of 580 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (48 of 580 decks)
- Convolute relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (45 of 580 decks)
EDH data for Change the Equation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 580 real decks.


































