Elvish Warmaster
Played in 6,737 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
10.0% Green
-
Golgari 28,875 · 42.6%
-
Sultai 14,488 · 21.4%
-
Green 6,737 · 10.0%
-
Naya 5,667 · 8.4%
-
Simic 5,293 · 7.8%
-
Bant 4,516 · 6.7%
- Other (16) 2,129 · 3.1%
3030+42+2+1+2+1+1+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 4.29 · 59.6% (2,508 of 4,211 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.78 · 63.3% (858 of 1,355 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 3.08 · 41.5% (580 of 1,398 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.03 · 32.0% (988 of 3,092 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 3.00 · 57.8% (249 of 431 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 2.76 · 66.0% (130 of 197 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 2.48 · 28.7% (362 of 1,263 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 2.08 · 28.5% (139 of 487 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.97 · 48.4% (46 of 95 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.96 · 36.6% (68 of 186 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 1.77 · 24.5% (87 of 355 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 1.23 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 0.78 · 25.0% (6 of 24 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.70 · 23.8% (5 of 21 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.67 · 5.1% (50 of 984 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.65 · 20.0% (5 of 25 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.64 · 5.1% (42 of 824 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.61 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.59 · 3.9% (62 of 1,581 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.58 · 5.7% (22 of 388 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.56 · 8.9% (9 of 101 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (21 of 539 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 0.44 · 4.1% (18 of 437 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (3 of 24 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.40 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.40 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.43 · 78.3% (5,273 of 6,737 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.43 · 76.5% (5,153 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.41 · 95.0% (6,400 of 6,737 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.14 · 62.2% (4,189 of 6,737 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.07 · 91.1% (6,136 of 6,737 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.96 · 57.9% (3,902 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.85 · 51.0% (3,438 of 6,737 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.74 · 47.8% (3,219 of 6,737 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.74 · 47.9% (3,228 of 6,737 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.73 · 46.3% (3,117 of 6,737 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.71 · 47.1% (3,176 of 6,737 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.67 · 42.4% (2,855 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.66 · 48.1% (3,238 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.60 · 40.8% (2,748 of 6,737 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.59 · 50.4% (3,395 of 6,737 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.58 · 43.7% (2,944 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.57 · 49.6% (3,339 of 6,737 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.54 · 42.2% (2,843 of 6,737 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.51 · 37.6% (2,533 of 6,737 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.49 · 39.5% (2,659 of 6,737 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.41 · 36.9% (2,488 of 6,737 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.40 · 45.9% (3,089 of 6,737 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.35 · 36.6% (2,466 of 6,737 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.34 · 64.6% (4,351 of 6,737 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.33 · 34.4% (2,319 of 6,737 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.30 · 33.8% (2,278 of 6,737 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.28 · 71.0% (4,782 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.27 · 32.2% (2,166 of 6,737 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.21 · 41.8% (2,818 of 6,737 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.13 · 45.5% (3,065 of 6,737 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.43 · 78.3% (5,273 of 6,737 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.43 · 76.5% (5,153 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.41 · 95.0% (6,400 of 6,737 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.14 · 62.2% (4,189 of 6,737 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.07 · 91.1% (6,136 of 6,737 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.96 · 57.9% (3,902 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.85 · 51.0% (3,438 of 6,737 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.74 · 47.8% (3,219 of 6,737 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.74 · 47.9% (3,228 of 6,737 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.73 · 46.3% (3,117 of 6,737 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.71 · 47.1% (3,176 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.66 · 48.1% (3,238 of 6,737 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.59 · 50.4% (3,395 of 6,737 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.58 · 43.7% (2,944 of 6,737 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.57 · 49.6% (3,339 of 6,737 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.54 · 42.2% (2,843 of 6,737 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.51 · 37.6% (2,533 of 6,737 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.49 · 39.5% (2,659 of 6,737 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.41 · 36.9% (2,488 of 6,737 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.40 · 45.9% (3,089 of 6,737 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.34 · 64.6% (4,351 of 6,737 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.33 · 34.4% (2,319 of 6,737 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.30 · 33.8% (2,278 of 6,737 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.28 · 71.0% (4,782 of 6,737 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.21 · 41.8% (2,818 of 6,737 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.13 · 45.5% (3,065 of 6,737 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 1.12 · 25.8% (1,738 of 6,737 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.10 · 28.8% (1,943 of 6,737 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.06 · 44.9% (3,025 of 6,737 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.04 · 24.8% (1,670 of 6,737 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.03 · 33.2% (2,239 of 6,737 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.03 · 30.9% (2,085 of 6,737 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.03 · 81.0% (5,455 of 6,737 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.00 · 63.5% (4,278 of 6,737 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.98 · 25.8% (1,735 of 6,737 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.96 · 42.7% (2,876 of 6,737 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (1,829 of 6,737 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.90 · 74.2% (4,999 of 6,737 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.89 · 25.6% (1,724 of 6,737 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.89 · 34.1% (2,297 of 6,737 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.87 · 18.8% (1,265 of 6,737 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.86 · 33.5% (2,258 of 6,737 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.00 · 35.1% (2,367 of 6,737 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.89 · 28.2% (1,900 of 6,737 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.27 · 32.2% (2,166 of 6,737 decks)
All instants (2)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.67 · 42.4% (2,855 of 6,737 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.35 · 36.6% (2,466 of 6,737 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.60 · 40.8% (2,748 of 6,737 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.04 · 29.3% (1,975 of 6,737 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.65 · 57.9% (3,901 of 6,737 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Warmaster: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,737 real decks.






















































