330+32+1+4+2+4+2+3+2+
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nature's Revolt 21.2% of decks
Nature's Revolt 21.2% of decks
Life and Limb 18.3% of decks
Life and Limb 18.3% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 22.1% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 22.1% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 22.1% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 22.1% of decks
Priest of Titania 23.1% of decks
Priest of Titania 23.1% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 20.2% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 20.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Thromok the Insatiable relevance 1.68 · 1.1% (16 of 1,408 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.20 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Jerrard of the Closed Fist relevance 0.43 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.45 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.22 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.91 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.90 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.80 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.80 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.79 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.78 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.75 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (13 of 104 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (16 of 104 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.60 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.59 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (11 of 104 decks)
- Embodiment of Fury relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.58 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.58 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.56 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
All creatures (32)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (23 of 104 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.91 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.90 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.80 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.80 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.77 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.75 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (13 of 104 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.62 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (16 of 104 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.60 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.59 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.59 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Embodiment of Fury relevance 0.58 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.58 · 27.9% (29 of 104 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.58 · 20.2% (21 of 104 decks)
- Viridian Joiner relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (17 of 104 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.54 · 14.4% (15 of 104 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.54 · 26.0% (27 of 104 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.53 · 12.5% (13 of 104 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.53 · 10.6% (11 of 104 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (16 of 104 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.51 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (11 of 104 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (8 of 104 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 1.45 · 21.2% (22 of 104 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 1.22 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.56 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (15 of 104 decks)
All instants (2)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (12 of 104 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.52 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.79 · 23.1% (24 of 104 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.78 · 17.3% (18 of 104 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.59 · 10.6% (11 of 104 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.54 · 13.5% (14 of 104 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (10 of 104 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (19 of 104 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (9 of 104 decks)
All lands (2)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.54 · 29.8% (31 of 104 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 34.6% (36 of 104 decks)
EDH data for Ambush Commander: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 104 real decks.







































