Cards like Tireless Tracker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Shrieking Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shrieking Drake 76%
- Dream Stalker 27%
Other options: Stickytongue Sentinel, Yarok's Wavecrasher, Invasive Species, Keymaster Rogue, Storm Sculptor, Ambush Krotiq, Denizen of the Deep
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 53%
- Elvish Mystic 43%
- Fyndhorn Elves 35%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Llanowar Tribe, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Neoform
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Neoform 25%
- Eldritch Evolution 20%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 70%
- Timeless Witness 17%
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Mystic Snake
8.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Snake 16%
- Frilled Mystic 12%
- Voidmage Husher 2%
Other options: Sister of Silence, Voracious Greatshark
Cards like Peregrine Drake
8.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 35%
- Pongify 34%
Cards like Elvish Visionary
7.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
9.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Primeval Herald, Simulacrum Shaper, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger, Wild Wanderer
Cards like Trophy Mage
9.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Essence Flux
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Coiling Oracle
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Coiling Oracle 55%
- Risen Reef 3%
Cards like Wood Elves
5.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Reclamation Sage
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reclamation Sage 50%
- Acidic Slime 2%
Other options: Foundation Breaker, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 49%
- Negate 21%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
All top picks (50)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.44 · 76.1% (83 of 109 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.40 · 72.5% (79 of 109 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.41 · 64.2% (70 of 109 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.44 · 55.0% (60 of 109 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.45 · 51.4% (56 of 109 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.39 · 66.1% (72 of 109 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.36 · 69.7% (76 of 109 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.44 · 47.7% (52 of 109 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.43 · 49.5% (54 of 109 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 43.1% (47 of 109 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.37 · 63.3% (69 of 109 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.33 · 75.2% (82 of 109 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.33 · 74.3% (81 of 109 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.34 · 69.7% (76 of 109 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.27 · 90.8% (99 of 109 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.40 · 50.5% (55 of 109 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.32 · 71.6% (78 of 109 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.37 · 56.0% (61 of 109 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.34 · 63.3% (69 of 109 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.33 · 65.1% (71 of 109 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.47 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.43 · 36.7% (40 of 109 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.47 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.43 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.33 · 59.6% (65 of 109 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.43 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.45 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.42 · 33.0% (36 of 109 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.45 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.45 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.43 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.42 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.46 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.42 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.41 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.41 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.44 · 19.3% (21 of 109 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.44 · 15.6% (17 of 109 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.37 · 34.9% (38 of 109 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.32 · 48.6% (53 of 109 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.41 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.44 · 76.1% (83 of 109 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.40 · 72.5% (79 of 109 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.41 · 64.2% (70 of 109 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.44 · 55.0% (60 of 109 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.45 · 51.4% (56 of 109 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.39 · 66.1% (72 of 109 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.36 · 69.7% (76 of 109 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.43 · 49.5% (54 of 109 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.45 · 43.1% (47 of 109 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.33 · 75.2% (82 of 109 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.33 · 74.3% (81 of 109 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.34 · 69.7% (76 of 109 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.27 · 90.8% (99 of 109 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 0.40 · 50.5% (55 of 109 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.32 · 71.6% (78 of 109 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.37 · 56.0% (61 of 109 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.47 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Dream Stalker relevance 0.47 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.33 · 59.6% (65 of 109 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.46 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.43 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.45 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.42 · 33.0% (36 of 109 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.45 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.42 · 29.4% (32 of 109 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.46 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Teething Wurmlet relevance 0.41 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.44 · 15.6% (17 of 109 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.32 · 48.6% (53 of 109 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (19 of 109 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.37 · 30.3% (33 of 109 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.43 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Briarbridge Patrol relevance 0.43 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.30 · 46.8% (51 of 109 decks)
- Lonis, Genetics Expert relevance 0.39 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.37 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.40 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- The Third Doctor relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.40 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.38 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Prosperous Innkeeper relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (14 of 109 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 0.42 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.44 · 47.7% (52 of 109 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.37 · 63.3% (69 of 109 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.33 · 65.1% (71 of 109 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.41 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.37 · 34.9% (38 of 109 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.41 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.42 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.41 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.28 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Investigator's Journal relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.16 · 12.8% (14 of 109 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.10 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.12 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.13 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.43 · 35.8% (39 of 109 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.39 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.43 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.31 · 15.6% (17 of 109 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.23 · 40.4% (44 of 109 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.26 · 19.3% (21 of 109 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Aluren relevance 0.33 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- A Realm Reborn relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Fae Offering relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 17.4% (19 of 109 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.25 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Killer Service relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Night of the Sweets' Revenge relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
All instants (50)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.43 · 36.7% (40 of 109 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.45 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.43 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.44 · 19.3% (21 of 109 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.34 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Expel from Orazca relevance 0.42 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (14 of 109 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (12 of 109 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.27 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (38 of 109 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (12 of 109 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.19 · 33.9% (37 of 109 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.20 · 22.0% (24 of 109 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.20 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.20 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.17 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 50.5% (55 of 109 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 33.0% (36 of 109 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (12 of 109 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.13 · 48.6% (53 of 109 decks)
- Spell Swindle relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Get Out relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.16 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (17 of 109 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 33.0% (36 of 109 decks)
- Machinate relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Commit // Memory relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.34 · 63.3% (69 of 109 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.42 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (19 of 109 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.38 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.41 · 17.4% (19 of 109 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.37 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Temporal Spring relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.36 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.19 · 24.8% (27 of 109 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (17 of 109 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.19 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.19 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.14 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Gone Missing relevance 0.25 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 13.8% (15 of 109 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.22 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.17 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (21 of 109 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.31 · 27.5% (30 of 109 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.34 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.21 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.11 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.33 · 21.1% (23 of 109 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (14 of 109 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.28 · 28.4% (31 of 109 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.27 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.25 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.26 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.17 · 49.5% (54 of 109 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.16 · 55.0% (60 of 109 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.27 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.18 · 37.6% (41 of 109 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.21 · 22.0% (24 of 109 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.27 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.17 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.23 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.13 · 26.6% (29 of 109 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 17.4% (19 of 109 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.25 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
All lands (50)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.25 · 22.9% (25 of 109 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.24 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.19 · 45.9% (50 of 109 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.19 · 47.7% (52 of 109 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.26 · 14.7% (16 of 109 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (9 of 109 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 45.0% (49 of 109 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.18 · 38.5% (42 of 109 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (13 of 109 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 20.2% (22 of 109 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.20 · 22.0% (24 of 109 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 23.9% (26 of 109 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.19 · 16.5% (18 of 109 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (12 of 109 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.18 · 18.3% (20 of 109 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 32.1% (35 of 109 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.12 · 57.8% (63 of 109 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.22 · 6.4% (7 of 109 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 41.3% (45 of 109 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 65.1% (71 of 109 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.18 · 10.1% (11 of 109 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (10 of 109 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 72.5% (79 of 109 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 55.0% (60 of 109 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 70.6% (77 of 109 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (6 of 109 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.12 · 25.7% (28 of 109 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.14 · 4.6% (5 of 109 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 66.1% (72 of 109 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.10 · 27.5% (30 of 109 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.09 · 31.2% (34 of 109 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.18 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.13 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.13 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.14 · 1.8% (2 of 109 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.08 · 7.3% (8 of 109 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lonis, Cryptozoologist, from 109 real Commander decks.