Change per day
Archetypes
83% of decks lean toward it
60% of decks lean toward it
49% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Panharmonicon
83% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Sea Gate Oracle
60% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Sower of Temptation
49% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Cloud of Faeries
47% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Aether Channeler
37% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 300 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ghostly Flicker 67%
- Displace 46%
- Illusionist's Stratagem 16%
Cards like Archaeomancer
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
9.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 68%
- Cloud of Faeries 19%
- Palinchron 12%
- Great Whale 3%
Cards like Man-o'-War
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Man-o'-War 21%
- Aether Adept 19%
- Exclusion Mage 18%
- Disruptor of Currents 6%
- Winter Eladrin 3%
- Rimekin Recluse 2%
Other options: Bigfin Bouncer, Riddlemaster Sphinx, Matterbending Mage, Roaming Ghostlight, Mist Raven, Iceridge Serpent, Angler Drake, Hotshot Investigators, Air-Cult Elemental, Peerless Ropemaster, Spellweaver Duo, Voidwielder, Hoverguard Sweepers, Surrakar Banisher, Separatist Voidmage
Cards like Sower of Temptation
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sower of Temptation 42%
- Mind Flayer 17%
Cards like Essence Flux
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
10.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Time Warp
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 39%
- Mystic Remora 33%
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards like Cloudkin Seer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Clever Impersonator
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Tribute Mage
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards like Nyx Lotus
5.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nyx Lotus 15%
- Throne of Eldraine 10%
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 23%
- Prismatic Lens 4%
- Coldsteel Heart 3%
- Star Compass 2%
Other options: Guardian Idol
Cards like Swan Song
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 35%
- Strix Serenade 8%
Cards like Strionic Resonator
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.04× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 73%
- Negate 34%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Spell Snare 1%
Other options: Stern Scolding, Nullify, False Summoning, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Force of Will
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 22%
- Force of Negation 18%
Cards like Diluvian Primordial
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.73 · 45.2% (330 of 730 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.71 · 43.0% (314 of 730 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.53 · 63.2% (461 of 730 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.49 · 69.3% (506 of 730 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.52 · 63.0% (460 of 730 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.54 · 53.4% (390 of 730 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.59 · 42.2% (308 of 730 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.65 · 29.2% (213 of 730 decks)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.74 · 16.6% (121 of 730 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.66 · 27.0% (197 of 730 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.66 · 26.2% (191 of 730 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 61.5% (449 of 730 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.47 · 57.7% (421 of 730 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.42 · 67.5% (493 of 730 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.62 · 31.0% (226 of 730 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.49 · 52.7% (385 of 730 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.60 · 33.2% (242 of 730 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.57 · 35.5% (259 of 730 decks)
- Exclusion Mage relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (128 of 730 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (107 of 730 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.51 · 45.8% (334 of 730 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.66 · 18.6% (136 of 730 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.54 · 39.2% (286 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Footpad relevance 0.78 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Cutpurse relevance 0.77 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.58 · 29.2% (213 of 730 decks)
- Shipwreck Dowser relevance 0.55 · 33.2% (242 of 730 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.61 · 23.3% (170 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Brigand relevance 0.76 · 8.6% (63 of 730 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.53 · 36.0% (263 of 730 decks)
- Salvager of Secrets relevance 0.64 · 15.1% (110 of 730 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (150 of 730 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.58 · 21.9% (160 of 730 decks)
- Stern Proctor relevance 0.69 · 10.1% (74 of 730 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.65 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.55 · 26.0% (190 of 730 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (288 of 730 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.36 · 67.1% (490 of 730 decks)
- Altar of the Pantheon relevance 0.71 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Slithermuse relevance 0.73 · 7.1% (52 of 730 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.55 · 26.0% (190 of 730 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.34 · 70.8% (517 of 730 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.55 · 25.2% (184 of 730 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (84 of 730 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.56 · 17.3% (126 of 730 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (105 of 730 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.56 · 16.4% (120 of 730 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.37 · 50.8% (371 of 730 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.51 · 20.1% (147 of 730 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.57 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.73 · 45.2% (330 of 730 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.71 · 43.0% (314 of 730 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.49 · 69.3% (506 of 730 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.52 · 63.0% (460 of 730 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.54 · 53.4% (390 of 730 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.59 · 42.2% (308 of 730 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.65 · 29.2% (213 of 730 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.66 · 27.0% (197 of 730 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.66 · 26.2% (191 of 730 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 61.5% (449 of 730 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.47 · 57.7% (421 of 730 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.42 · 67.5% (493 of 730 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.62 · 31.0% (226 of 730 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.60 · 33.2% (242 of 730 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.57 · 35.5% (259 of 730 decks)
- Exclusion Mage relevance 0.68 · 17.5% (128 of 730 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (107 of 730 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.66 · 18.6% (136 of 730 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.54 · 39.2% (286 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Footpad relevance 0.78 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Cutpurse relevance 0.77 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Shipwreck Dowser relevance 0.55 · 33.2% (242 of 730 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.61 · 23.3% (170 of 730 decks)
- Rishadan Brigand relevance 0.76 · 8.6% (63 of 730 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.53 · 36.0% (263 of 730 decks)
- Salvager of Secrets relevance 0.64 · 15.1% (110 of 730 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (150 of 730 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.58 · 21.9% (160 of 730 decks)
- Stern Proctor relevance 0.69 · 10.1% (74 of 730 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.65 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.55 · 26.0% (190 of 730 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.48 · 39.5% (288 of 730 decks)
- Slithermuse relevance 0.73 · 7.1% (52 of 730 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.34 · 70.8% (517 of 730 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.55 · 25.2% (184 of 730 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.56 · 17.3% (126 of 730 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.37 · 50.8% (371 of 730 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.57 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (96 of 730 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.55 · 12.9% (94 of 730 decks)
- Floodgate relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (75 of 730 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (91 of 730 decks)
- Emeritus of Ideation // Ancestral Recall relevance 0.49 · 20.1% (147 of 730 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.37 · 46.8% (342 of 730 decks)
- Quantum Riddler relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (80 of 730 decks)
- Duplicant relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (115 of 730 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (195 of 730 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.52 · 12.1% (88 of 730 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.39 · 34.1% (249 of 730 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 0.54 · 9.6% (70 of 730 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.53 · 63.2% (461 of 730 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.49 · 52.7% (385 of 730 decks)
- Altar of the Pantheon relevance 0.71 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.55 · 26.0% (190 of 730 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (84 of 730 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.51 · 20.1% (147 of 730 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.46 · 15.2% (111 of 730 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (84 of 730 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (87 of 730 decks)
- Pyre of Heroes relevance 0.55 · 3.0% (22 of 730 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.42 · 4.4% (32 of 730 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (89 of 730 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (74 of 730 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.24 · 27.4% (200 of 730 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.25 · 20.8% (152 of 730 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (167 of 730 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (41 of 730 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.25 · 15.1% (110 of 730 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (32 of 730 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (50 of 730 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (27 of 730 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (87 of 730 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.18 · 42.1% (307 of 730 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (31 of 730 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.23 · 13.7% (100 of 730 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (36 of 730 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.25 · 9.9% (72 of 730 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (49 of 730 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (64 of 730 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (27 of 730 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (44 of 730 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (30 of 730 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (66 of 730 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.12 · 55.5% (405 of 730 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.10 · 73.7% (538 of 730 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (51 of 730 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (43 of 730 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (29 of 730 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (39 of 730 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.74 · 16.6% (121 of 730 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.58 · 29.2% (213 of 730 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.50 · 5.3% (39 of 730 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.57 · 4.0% (29 of 730 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (55 of 730 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (37 of 730 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.33 · 14.2% (104 of 730 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (33 of 730 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (62 of 730 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.28 · 14.5% (106 of 730 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 39.2% (286 of 730 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.20 · 32.6% (238 of 730 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (42 of 730 decks)
- Kiora Bests the Sea God relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (22 of 730 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (44 of 730 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (19 of 730 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.17 · 29.3% (214 of 730 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (27 of 730 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (33 of 730 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (37 of 730 decks)
All instants (50)
- Displace relevance 0.51 · 45.8% (334 of 730 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.36 · 67.1% (490 of 730 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (105 of 730 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.56 · 16.4% (120 of 730 decks)
- Ray of Command relevance 0.63 · 7.8% (57 of 730 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.37 · 39.7% (290 of 730 decks)
- Thassa's Intervention relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (55 of 730 decks)
- Domineering Will relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (52 of 730 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Thassa's Rebuff relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (50 of 730 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.43 · 10.8% (79 of 730 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.45 · 8.4% (61 of 730 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (103 of 730 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.37 · 14.2% (104 of 730 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.44 · 6.6% (48 of 730 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (91 of 730 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (36 of 730 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.28 · 19.9% (145 of 730 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.31 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.30 · 10.0% (73 of 730 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 37.0% (270 of 730 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.25 · 22.3% (163 of 730 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.25 · 17.8% (130 of 730 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.27 · 14.2% (104 of 730 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 25.8% (188 of 730 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.22 · 31.6% (231 of 730 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.24 · 18.2% (133 of 730 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.19 · 41.9% (306 of 730 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.23 · 24.2% (177 of 730 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.29 · 8.4% (61 of 730 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.22 · 26.8% (196 of 730 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.30 · 6.7% (49 of 730 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.24 · 17.7% (129 of 730 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (52 of 730 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 35.3% (258 of 730 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (96 of 730 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (60 of 730 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (66 of 730 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (28 of 730 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.14 · 50.3% (367 of 730 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (48 of 730 decks)
All sorceries (37)
- Bribery relevance 0.44 · 15.2% (111 of 730 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.41 · 21.1% (154 of 730 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (94 of 730 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.39 · 16.6% (121 of 730 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.43 · 5.5% (40 of 730 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (118 of 730 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (44 of 730 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (42 of 730 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (37 of 730 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (42 of 730 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.28 · 14.2% (104 of 730 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.29 · 10.4% (76 of 730 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (32 of 730 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (60 of 730 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (33 of 730 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.30 · 4.8% (35 of 730 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 17.0% (124 of 730 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (55 of 730 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 19.7% (144 of 730 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 26.8% (196 of 730 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (21 of 730 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (22 of 730 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (22 of 730 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (75 of 730 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (21 of 730 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (20 of 730 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (21 of 730 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (24 of 730 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.31 · 14.1% (103 of 730 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (73 of 730 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (20 of 730 decks)
All utility lands (44)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.40 · 32.9% (240 of 730 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.48 · 12.6% (92 of 730 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.50 · 6.8% (50 of 730 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.35 · 24.5% (179 of 730 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.28 · 30.8% (225 of 730 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (89 of 730 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (62 of 730 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.26 · 20.8% (152 of 730 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.31 · 10.5% (77 of 730 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.26 · 15.2% (111 of 730 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (44 of 730 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (68 of 730 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.25 · 15.9% (116 of 730 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (69 of 730 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.29 · 8.1% (59 of 730 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.25 · 13.7% (100 of 730 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.22 · 23.0% (168 of 730 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (42 of 730 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (35 of 730 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (37 of 730 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (30 of 730 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (39 of 730 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 29.0% (212 of 730 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.24 · 13.6% (99 of 730 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 26.2% (191 of 730 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (31 of 730 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (99 of 730 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (45 of 730 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 59.2% (432 of 730 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (29 of 730 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (18 of 730 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (21 of 730 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (80 of 730 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (28 of 730 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 56.0% (409 of 730 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (45 of 730 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (28 of 730 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (19 of 730 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (20 of 730 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (30 of 730 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (19 of 730 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (16)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.29 · 40.1% (293 of 730 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (86 of 730 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (102 of 730 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (65 of 730 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.29 · 8.4% (61 of 730 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (64 of 730 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (38 of 730 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (61 of 730 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (46 of 730 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (26 of 730 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (25 of 730 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (67 of 730 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (18 of 730 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (21 of 730 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (23 of 730 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 83.0% (606 of 730 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Thassa, Deep-Dwelling, from 730 real Commander decks.