Cards like Pollenbright Druid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
84% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thrummingbird
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
84% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Contentious Plan
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
84% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Tyrranax Atrocity
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
74% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Glistener Elf
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
68% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Glistener Elf 89%
- Blightwidow 68%
- Cystbearer 53%
- Phyrexian Digester 37%
Cards like Bloom Hulk
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Bloom Hulk 53%
- Gitaxian Anatomist 42%
- Kiora's Dambreaker 16%
Cards like Sabertooth Cobra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sabertooth Cobra 58%
- Marsh Viper 37%
Cards like Ichorclaw Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Ichorclaw Myr 84%
- Tel-Jilad Fallen 32%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 63%
- Elvish Mystic 53%
- Fyndhorn Elves 42%
- Boreal Druid 5%
- Rootrider Faun 5%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
18× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Zegana, Utopian Speaker, Tuskguard Captain, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Counterspell
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 68%
- Negate 26%
- Intervene 11%
- Remove Soul 5%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Spell Pierce
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spell Pierce 16%
- Lose Focus 11%
- Mana Leak 11%
- Make Disappear 5%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Clash of Wills, Revolutionary Rebuff, Force Spike, Logic Knot, Metallic Rebuke, It'll Quench Ya!, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound, Quench
Cards like Archaeomancer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Archaeomancer 16%
- Mnemonic Wall 11%
Other options: Scholar of the Ages, Scrivener, Salvager of Secrets, Shipwreck Dowser
Cards like Overgrown Battlement
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cloud of Faeries
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
7.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Moon-Circuit Hacker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Smell Fear
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Aqueous Form
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 47%
- Security Bypass 11%
Cards like Experimental Augury
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Wild Growth
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 16%
- Fertile Ground 5%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Overgrowth
All top picks (50)
- Copper Longlegs relevance 0.50 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Tyrranax Atrocity relevance 0.52 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Ichorclaw Myr relevance 0.47 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Branchblight Stalker relevance 0.51 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Plague Nurse relevance 0.53 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 0.50 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Adaptive Sporesinger relevance 0.45 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.42 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Dune Mover relevance 0.51 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.50 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.42 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Pistus Strike relevance 0.52 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.42 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.42 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Corpse Cur relevance 0.48 · 63.2% (12 of 19 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.37 · 100.0% (19 of 19 decks)
- Sabertooth Cobra relevance 0.49 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Rot Wolf relevance 0.46 · 63.2% (12 of 19 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.37 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.34 · 94.7% (18 of 19 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.36 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.44 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.38 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.32 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Cystbearer relevance 0.46 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.37 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.39 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Viridian Betrayers relevance 0.49 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Contagious Vorrac relevance 0.42 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.38 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Chained Throatseeker relevance 0.48 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.35 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.41 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.41 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.40 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.30 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.38 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.29 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Marsh Viper relevance 0.43 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Phyrexian Digester relevance 0.43 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.40 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Fallen relevance 0.43 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.25 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Maze's Mantle relevance 0.41 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.25 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.32 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Virulent Sliver relevance 0.36 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.28 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.26 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.33 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Copper Longlegs relevance 0.50 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Tyrranax Atrocity relevance 0.52 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Ichorclaw Myr relevance 0.47 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Branchblight Stalker relevance 0.51 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Plague Nurse relevance 0.53 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Ichorspit Basilisk relevance 0.50 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Adaptive Sporesinger relevance 0.45 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.42 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Dune Mover relevance 0.51 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.50 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.42 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.42 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Corpse Cur relevance 0.48 · 63.2% (12 of 19 decks)
- Sabertooth Cobra relevance 0.49 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Rot Wolf relevance 0.46 · 63.2% (12 of 19 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.34 · 94.7% (18 of 19 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.36 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Cystbearer relevance 0.46 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Viridian Betrayers relevance 0.49 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Contagious Vorrac relevance 0.42 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Chained Throatseeker relevance 0.48 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.41 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.40 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Marsh Viper relevance 0.43 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Phyrexian Digester relevance 0.43 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.40 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Fallen relevance 0.43 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.25 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Virulent Sliver relevance 0.36 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.28 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.33 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Crafty Pathmage relevance 0.34 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Jhessian Thief relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Nine-Tail White Fox relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Stealer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.18 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Kiora's Dambreaker relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Sage Owl relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.19 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Soulknife Spy relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Vigean Hydropon relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.18 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Scroll Thief relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
All artifacts (27)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.38 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.25 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Serrated Arrows relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Phyrexian Atlas relevance 0.32 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.17 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Baton of Courage relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Opaline Bracers relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Adventurer's Airship relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Implement of Ferocity relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Buried Treasure relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Ecologist's Terrarium relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Honored Heirloom relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.07 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.05 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.05 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.05 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.04 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.42 · 78.9% (15 of 19 decks)
- Maze's Mantle relevance 0.41 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.32 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.21 · 47.4% (9 of 19 decks)
- Protective Bubble relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.20 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Tricks of the Trade relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.18 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.16 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Tidal Flats relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Primal Frenzy relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Night Soil relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Fall from Favor relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Invisibility relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.10 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Watery Grasp relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.09 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.09 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All instants (50)
- Pistus Strike relevance 0.52 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.37 · 100.0% (19 of 19 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.37 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Aspirant's Ascent relevance 0.44 · 57.9% (11 of 19 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.38 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Bring the Ending relevance 0.41 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.29 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.26 · 52.6% (10 of 19 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.19 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Dragonscale Boon relevance 0.23 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Battlegrowth relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.17 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Arbor Armament relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.14 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.15 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.12 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.12 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Duel for Dominance relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Bar the Gate relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Make Disappear relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Miscalculation relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Mutant's Prey relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.08 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.06 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Lofty Denial relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
All sorceries (43)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.32 · 89.5% (17 of 19 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.37 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.39 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.38 · 68.4% (13 of 19 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.35 · 73.7% (14 of 19 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.30 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Ghostform relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.11 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Call the Scions relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Thrive relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Distortion Strike relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.06 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.06 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.05 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.05 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.05 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.05 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.05 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.04 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All utility lands (28)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.24 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Quicksand relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.11 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.10 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.07 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.07 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.07 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.05 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.05 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.05 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
All lands (30)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.32 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.31 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.18 · 47.4% (9 of 19 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.16 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 26.3% (5 of 19 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.12 · 47.4% (9 of 19 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.16 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.15 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.13 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.14 · 21.1% (4 of 19 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.12 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.10 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.09 · 36.8% (7 of 19 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.09 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.06 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.08 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.06 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.06 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 84.2% (16 of 19 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tainted Observer, from 19 real Commander decks.