Cards like Brainstorm
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 80%
- Brainsurge 47%
Cards like Iron Man, Armored Avenger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger 32%
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant 24%
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment 14%
- Clinquant Skymage 8%
- Oneirophage 2%
Other options: Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Proft's Eidetic Memory
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Simic decks
Cards like Growth Spiral
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 69%
- Eureka Moment 24%
- Joint Exploration 3%
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thirst for Discovery
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
3.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harmonized Crescendo
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 58%
- Negate 32%
- Essence Scatter 3%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Growth Curve
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Ant-Man, Colony Commander
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 53%
- Lightning Greaves 22%
Cards like Doubling Season
2.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Doubling Season 37%
- Primal Vigor 12%
- Parallel Lives 10%
Cards like Aetherize
5.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 17%
- Perplexing Test 3%
- Evacuation 3%
Cards like Lessons from Life
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
9.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
3.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sphere Grid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sphere Grid 17%
- Training Regimen 14%
Cards like Pym Particles
7.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Training Grounds
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Whirlpool Rider
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Kid Loki
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Lat-Nam Adept, Blue Marvel, Adam Brashear, Erudite Wizard, Lakeshore Apothecary, Burlfist Oak, Thopter Mechanic, Faerie Vandal, Knowledge Seeker
Cards like Origin of Metalbending
8.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 32%
- Rhystic Study 29%
All top picks (50)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.43 · 62.7% (37 of 59 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.44 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.45 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.42 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.43 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.43 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.39 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.37 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.41 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.41 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.35 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.40 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.31 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.24 · 81.4% (48 of 59 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.41 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.40 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.26 · 64.4% (38 of 59 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.21 · 79.7% (47 of 59 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.34 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.37 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.26 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.30 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.32 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.38 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.29 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.29 · 40.7% (24 of 59 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.32 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.33 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.28 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.32 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.25 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.34 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.27 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.27 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.27 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.33 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.44 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Ant-Man, Colony Commander relevance 0.45 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.42 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.43 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.39 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.41 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.41 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.40 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.38 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.34 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.26 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.32 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Iridescent Hornbeetle relevance 0.38 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Professor Hulk relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.32 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.37 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.32 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.27 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Whirlpool Rider relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.27 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.29 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Reed Richards, Smartest Man relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.35 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.29 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.30 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.31 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.21 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Knight of Wundagore relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Beast, Erudite Aerialist relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.27 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Ant-Man, Reformed Rogue relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Arni, Humble Scribe relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.25 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.23 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Buzz Bots relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Meltstrider Eulogist relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.23 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.21 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.17 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.43 · 62.7% (37 of 59 decks)
- Combine Chrysalis relevance 0.37 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.29 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- The Ten Rings relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.13 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 72.9% (43 of 59 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.17 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.14 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Heirloom Epic relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Unstable Molecule Suit relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Sword of the Squeak relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Super Suit relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Arc Reactor relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Thrór's Map relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Ether relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 81.4% (48 of 59 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.31 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.24 · 81.4% (48 of 59 decks)
- Super Intelligence relevance 0.41 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.30 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.38 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.33 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.28 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.25 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.33 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.28 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.29 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.26 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.24 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.22 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.21 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.22 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.18 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Rewrite History relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Frozen in Ice relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.21 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Super Strength relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Military Intelligence relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
All instants (50)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.35 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.31 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.26 · 64.4% (38 of 59 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.21 · 79.7% (47 of 59 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.29 · 40.7% (24 of 59 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.34 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.33 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.32 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.30 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.32 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- We Say Thee Nay! relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.25 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.29 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Depower relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.27 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.21 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.23 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.12 · 69.5% (41 of 59 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.18 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.21 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.16 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.18 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.43 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.37 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Spry and Mighty relevance 0.40 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.36 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.27 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.36 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.30 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.28 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.30 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.26 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.18 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.24 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.22 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.19 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.18 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Body of Research relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.10 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.27 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Avengers Tower relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.18 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Baxter Building relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.17 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.18 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.15 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.12 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 10.2% (6 of 59 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Surveillance Room relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.05 · 67.8% (40 of 59 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.09 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
All lands (50)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.36 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.20 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.26 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.21 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.18 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.12 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.16 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.15 · 11.9% (7 of 59 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.09 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.08 · 61.0% (36 of 59 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (4 of 59 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 71.2% (42 of 59 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Archway Commons relevance 0.16 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.11 · 5.1% (3 of 59 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.15 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.14 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.13 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Astonishing Ant-Man, from 59 real Commander decks.