Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50All top picks (50)
- Prizefight relevance 0.69 · 37.3% (79 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.67 · 39.2% (83 of 212 decks)
- Novel Nunchaku relevance 0.68 · 37.7% (80 of 212 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.69 · 32.1% (68 of 212 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.70 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.59 · 41.0% (87 of 212 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.66 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.49 · 56.1% (119 of 212 decks)
- Mutant's Prey relevance 0.68 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.65 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.63 · 25.9% (55 of 212 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Pariah's Shield relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (70 of 212 decks)
- Pounce relevance 0.66 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Mutant Chain Reaction relevance 0.55 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.54 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.52 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Duel for Dominance relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.48 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.45 · 32.5% (69 of 212 decks)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.62 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.46 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Genghis Frog relevance 0.49 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.48 · 21.7% (46 of 212 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.44 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.61 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.52 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.52 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Epic Confrontation relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.42 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.40 · 32.5% (69 of 212 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.43 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Leatherhead, Swamp Stalker relevance 0.48 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Crustacean Commando relevance 0.50 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.48 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
Card Stacks
24
Card Stacks
24
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 All creatures (50)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 0.66 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (70 of 212 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.54 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Man Ray relevance 0.52 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.48 · 26.4% (56 of 212 decks)
- Genghis Frog relevance 0.49 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.42 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.40 · 32.5% (69 of 212 decks)
- Big Mother Mouser relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Leatherhead, Swamp Stalker relevance 0.48 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Crustacean Commando relevance 0.50 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.42 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.48 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Foe-Razer Regent relevance 0.51 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.46 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.40 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.40 · 16.0% (34 of 212 decks)
- Donatello, Way with Machines relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Primordial Pachyderm relevance 0.47 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Buzz Bots relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Zoo Escapees relevance 0.46 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Ever Adaptable relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Golden Guardian // Gold-Forge Garrison relevance 0.45 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Slithering Cryptid relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, the Heart relevance 0.41 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Ragamuffin Raptor relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Punk Frogs relevance 0.40 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- The Lion-Turtle relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Transdimensional Bovine relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.31 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.34 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo, On the Scene relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Donatello, Turtle Techie relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Stockman, Mad Fly-entist relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 All artifacts (50)
- Novel Nunchaku relevance 0.68 · 37.7% (80 of 212 decks)
- Pariah's Shield relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.45 · 32.5% (69 of 212 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.61 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.52 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Guac & Marshmallow Pizza relevance 0.50 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.46 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.44 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Bespoke Bō relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (37 of 212 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Caltrops relevance 0.45 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Ring of Kalonia relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 35.8% (76 of 212 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Mechanical Glider relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Hero's Heirloom relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.33 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Agent's Toolkit relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.20 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 All enchantments (50)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (44 of 212 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.46 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Retro-Mutation relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Warbriar Blessing relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.42 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.47 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.38 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.29 · 22.6% (48 of 212 decks)
- Druid's Call relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.34 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Predatory Urge relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.23 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.20 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.20 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.17 · 31.6% (67 of 212 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Drake Umbra relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 All instants (50)
- Prizefight relevance 0.69 · 37.3% (79 of 212 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.67 · 39.2% (83 of 212 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.69 · 32.1% (68 of 212 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.59 · 41.0% (87 of 212 decks)
- Mutant's Prey relevance 0.68 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.65 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Pounce relevance 0.66 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Duel for Dominance relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (21 of 212 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.48 · 21.7% (46 of 212 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.44 · 31.1% (66 of 212 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.52 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Ooze Spill relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (42 of 212 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.43 · 24.1% (51 of 212 decks)
- Return to the Sewers relevance 0.50 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Unnatural Aggression relevance 0.52 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.39 · 15.6% (33 of 212 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.29 · 40.1% (85 of 212 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.46 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.36 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.34 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.21 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.18 · 38.2% (81 of 212 decks)
- Bloodscent relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 All sorceries (50)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.70 · 28.3% (60 of 212 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.49 · 56.1% (119 of 212 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.63 · 25.9% (55 of 212 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (43 of 212 decks)
- Mutant Chain Reaction relevance 0.55 · 24.5% (52 of 212 decks)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.62 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.56 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Clash of the Eikons relevance 0.58 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Epic Confrontation relevance 0.59 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Plow Through relevance 0.57 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Ruthless Predation relevance 0.56 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.37 · 35.8% (76 of 212 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Time to Feed relevance 0.52 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Malamet Battle Glyph relevance 0.51 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Mage Duel relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.48 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Cowabunga! relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.44 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Michelangelo's Technique relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Savage Swipe relevance 0.50 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Struggle for Skemfar relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (38 of 212 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (15 of 212 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.29 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Blizzard Brawl relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.33 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Hunt the Hunter relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Alluring Scent relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.21 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.24 · 10.4% (22 of 212 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 32.1% (68 of 212 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
Planeswalkers
2
Planeswalkers
2 All planeswalkers (2)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 All utility lands (50)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.52 · 21.2% (45 of 212 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.37 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (20 of 212 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.28 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Cavernous Maw relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.24 · 13.7% (29 of 212 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.30 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (24 of 212 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (19 of 212 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 22.2% (47 of 212 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (26 of 212 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 11.8% (25 of 212 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.13 · 8.0% (17 of 212 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 17.0% (36 of 212 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 8.5% (18 of 212 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.11 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 28.8% (61 of 212 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (8 of 212 decks)
Lands
42
Lands
42 All lands (42)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.46 · 29.7% (63 of 212 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.35 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (27 of 212 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Grand Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (10 of 212 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 19.3% (41 of 212 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 29.2% (62 of 212 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.23 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.18 · 13.2% (28 of 212 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 19.3% (41 of 212 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (11 of 212 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (39 of 212 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.15 · 14.2% (30 of 212 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (9 of 212 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (32 of 212 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.14 · 16.5% (35 of 212 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (12 of 212 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 14.6% (31 of 212 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 39.2% (83 of 212 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.14 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 23.6% (50 of 212 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 6.1% (13 of 212 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (16 of 212 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 27.4% (58 of 212 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 21.7% (46 of 212 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.09 · 18.9% (40 of 212 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 10.8% (23 of 212 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (53 of 212 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (6 of 212 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 26.9% (57 of 212 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 42.0% (89 of 212 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (5 of 212 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 65.1% (138 of 212 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.2% (189 of 212 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 84.9% (180 of 212 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Venus, Torn Between Worlds, from 212 real Commander decks.















































































































































































































































































































































































