Cards like Ioreth of the Healing House
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ioreth of the Healing House 34%
- Kelpie Guide 32%
- Forensic Researcher 26%
- Fatestitcher 21%
- North Pole Patrol 11%
- Puppeteer 8%
Other options: Niblis of the Breath, Captain of the Mists, Stonybrook Angler
Cards like Counterspell
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other blue decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Counterspell 87%
- Negate 55%
- Spell Snare 3%
- Essence Scatter 3%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Thought Vessel
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thought Vessel 66%
- Decanter of Endless Water 29%
- Spellbook 18%
Cards like Temporal Manipulation
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Aetherize 50%
- Evacuation 24%
- Perplexing Test 3%
Cards like Foil
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Body of Knowledge
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Body of Knowledge 21%
- Sturmgeist 13%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 42%
- Lightning Greaves 32%
Cards like Force of Will
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 34%
- Force of Negation 24%
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Puppet Strings
Cards like Clever Conjurer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clever Conjurer 24%
- Nimbleclaw Adept 11%
Cards like Fog Bank
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fog Bank 16%
- Guard Gomazoa 8%
Cards like Ivory Tower
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Pongify
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 47%
- Rapid Hybridization 39%
Cards like Gilded Lotus
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 74%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Archmage of Runes
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other blue decks
Cards like Wizard Class
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 37%
- Mystic Remora 34%
Cards like Rewind
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Commandeer
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards like Ponder
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 92%
- Basalt Monolith 11%
- Mana Vault 11%
- Grim Monolith 5%
Cards like Psychic Corrosion
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Mana Sculpt
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mocking Sprite
Cards like Isochron Scepter
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Nyx Lotus
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Nyx Lotus 18%
- Throne of Eldraine 11%
Cards like Freed from the Real
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 34%
- Coldsteel Heart 11%
- Star Compass 3%
- Prismatic Lens 3%
Other options: Guardian Idol
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Reed Richards, Smartest Man, Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan
Cards like Spell Pierce
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Force Spike, Logic Knot, Metallic Rebuke, It'll Quench Ya!, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound, Quench
Cards like Preordain
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 26%
- Serum Visions 8%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
All top picks (50)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.39 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.37 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.37 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.35 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.33 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.38 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.35 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.33 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.35 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.34 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.28 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.33 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.21 · 57.9% (22 of 38 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.30 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.24 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.22 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Nimbleclaw Adept relevance 0.30 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.21 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.17 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.21 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.24 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.17 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Puppeteer relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.24 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.25 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.22 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.19 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Jushi Apprentice // Tomoya the Revealer relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.18 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.19 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.22 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Temporal Adept relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.24 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.35 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.33 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.38 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.35 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.33 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.35 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.33 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.21 · 57.9% (22 of 38 decks)
- Sturmgeist relevance 0.30 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Nimbleclaw Adept relevance 0.30 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.17 · 60.5% (23 of 38 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.21 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Puppeteer relevance 0.29 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.24 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.25 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 0.26 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.24 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Aeon Chronicler relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.22 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Jushi Apprentice // Tomoya the Revealer relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.18 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Temporal Adept relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.21 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.19 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Ertai, Wizard Adept relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Riptide Director relevance 0.23 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.19 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Great Whale relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Voidmage Prodigy relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.15 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.15 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Kairi, the Swirling Sky relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.14 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.37 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.34 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.29 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.21 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.23 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.19 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.22 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.21 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.20 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Pristine Talisman relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.20 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.13 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.12 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Mystic Compass relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.14 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.08 · 65.8% (25 of 38 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Mirari relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Brass Infiniscope relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Grimoire of the Dead relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Super Suit relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Hithlain Rope relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.39 · 52.6% (20 of 38 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.37 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.28 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.24 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.22 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.19 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.24 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.17 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.21 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.19 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Robe of Mirrors relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Dream Halls relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Uncover the Moon-Letters relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.11 · 44.7% (17 of 38 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Phantasmal Terrain relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Immobilizing Ink relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Decree of Silence relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Day of the Dragons relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Ancestral Knowledge relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Energy Field relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Faces of the Past relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- In Too Deep relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.11 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Spreading Seas relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All instants (50)
- Forbid relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.24 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.17 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Vault Skyward relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.22 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.19 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.17 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.16 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.17 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.18 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Reset relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.16 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.11 · 55.3% (21 of 38 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.17 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.17 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.13 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.15 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.12 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.15 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.15 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Into the Story relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.14 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.10 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.12 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Chain Stasis relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Desynchronize relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.14 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.13 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.09 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 39.5% (15 of 38 decks)
- Veil of Secrecy relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Trickery Charm relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Revolutionary Rebuff relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Glint relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.11 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (19 of 38 decks)
- Abstruse Interference relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Mind Spring relevance 0.24 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.20 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.18 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.14 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.12 · 26.3% (10 of 38 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Split the Party relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.15 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Train of Thought relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Selective Memory relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.12 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Inscription of Insight relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Bond of Insight relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Drawn from Dreams relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.10 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Modify Memory relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (17)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.16 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.18 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.10 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Reality Sculptor relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.09 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 42.1% (16 of 38 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.17 · 36.8% (14 of 38 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.17 · 31.6% (12 of 38 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.16 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Mouth of Ronom relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 78.9% (30 of 38 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.13 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.11 · 15.8% (6 of 38 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.11 · 13.2% (5 of 38 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Umara Wizard // Umara Skyfalls relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.12 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.08 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.05 · 65.8% (25 of 38 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.10 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.10 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
All lands (31)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.17 · 18.4% (7 of 38 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 28.9% (11 of 38 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (9 of 38 decks)
- Sand Silos relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.14 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.11 · 10.5% (4 of 38 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.11 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.10 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.11 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.10 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.08 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.07 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.06 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.06 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.05 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 86.8% (33 of 38 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Arcanis the Omnipotent, from 38 real Commander decks.