Cards like Skinwing
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Skinwing 36%
- Mandibular Kite 36%
- Auxiliary Boosters 32%
Cards like Ancestral Mask
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like New Horizons
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Weirding Wood
Cards like Fertile Ground
4.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Selesnya decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Fertile Ground 29%
- Blighted Burgeoning 21%
- Wild Growth 21%
- Dawn's Reflection 18%
- Overgrowth 18%
- Market Festival 11%
- Verdant Haven 4%
Other options: Glittering Frost, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Buried in the Garden
Cards like Ethereal Armor
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Ethereal Armor 54%
- Hyena Umbra 32%
- Cartouche of Solidarity 11%
Cards like Mirran Bardiche
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Armory of Iroas
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Fractal Harness, Bone Sabres, Sword of Hours
Cards like Flayer Husk
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Flayer Husk 32%
- Sickleslicer 32%
- Strandwalker 4%
Cards like Mammoth Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Knightly Valor
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Knightly Valor 21%
- Observant Alseid 18%
- Due Diligence 4%
Other options: Triclopean Sight, Sentinel's Mark
Cards like Starnheim Courser
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Setessan Training
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Ritual of Steel, Rune of Might, Frog Tongue, Chosen by Heliod
Cards like Gaea's Gift
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Benevolent Blessing
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Floating Shield, Prismatic Ward, Ward of Lights
Cards like Spider Umbra
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Commune with the Gods
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Gather the Pack, Animal Magnetism
Cards like Airtight Alibi
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Airtight Alibi 29%
- Maze's Mantle 7%
Cards like Crystal Carapace
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Hopeful Eidolon
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Hopeful Eidolon 18%
- Squire's Devotion 11%
Cards like Cartouche of Strength
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 25%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Heliod's Pilgrim
7.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Light-Paws, Emperor's Voice, Auratouched Mage, Boonweaver Giant
Cards like Evolution Witness
3.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Chains of Custody
2.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: On Thin Ice, Hardlight Containment, Dimensional Exile, Faith Unbroken, Chained to the Rocks, Ossification
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Snakeskin Veil 36%
- Ranger's Guile 4%
- Overprotect 4%
Other options: Tyvar's Stand, Blossoming Defense, Woodcutter's Grit, Beaming Defiance
All top picks (50)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.47 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Ancestral Blade relevance 0.48 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Skinwing relevance 0.54 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Mirran Bardiche relevance 0.52 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Sickleslicer relevance 0.54 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Flayer Husk relevance 0.49 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Goldwarden's Helm relevance 0.48 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Auxiliary Boosters relevance 0.44 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.41 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Bard's Bow relevance 0.43 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Monk's Fist relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Rosecot Knight relevance 0.44 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Mandibular Kite relevance 0.41 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.39 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Paladin's Arms relevance 0.42 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.40 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Mammoth Umbra relevance 0.39 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ironclad Slayer relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.36 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.36 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.38 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- White Mage's Staff relevance 0.36 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Candlelight Vigil relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Captured by Lagacs relevance 0.34 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.33 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya Enchantress relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Greatsword of Tyr relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.31 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Benevolent Blessing relevance 0.31 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Vastwood Zendikon relevance 0.37 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Angelic Gift relevance 0.29 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Chains of Custody relevance 0.31 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Knightly Valor relevance 0.34 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Hobble relevance 0.36 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.25 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.24 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.28 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Observant Alseid relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Glimmerlight relevance 0.34 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Kyoshi Battle Fan relevance 0.31 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.26 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Pentarch Ward relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Leafcrown Dryad relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Harmonious Emergence relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Rosecot Knight relevance 0.44 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Ironclad Slayer relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Unicorn relevance 0.33 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya Enchantress relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.28 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Observant Alseid relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.26 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Leafcrown Dryad relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Wolf relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 0.28 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Hopeful Eidolon relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.28 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Faithful Watchdog relevance 0.25 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Starnheim Courser relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Nyxborn Shieldmate relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Weapons Vendor relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Bond Beetle relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Shinewend relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Avenging Druid relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Heir of the Ancient Fang relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Badger // Dig Deep relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Transcendent Envoy relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Wickerbough Elder relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Redtooth Genealogist relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Auramancer relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Arcbound Hybrid relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Poised Practitioner relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ferocious Werefox // Guard Change relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Nest Invader relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sunblade Samurai relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ainok Guide relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.16 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Riftwalker relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Bonesetter relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Dawnblade relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Loreweaver relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Diviner relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Novice Inspector relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Split-Tail Miko relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Steadfast Sentinel relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kitsune Blademaster relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Excavation Mole relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Pious Kitsune relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Guardian of the Guildpact relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thraben Inspector relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.47 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Ancestral Blade relevance 0.48 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Skinwing relevance 0.54 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Mirran Bardiche relevance 0.52 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Sickleslicer relevance 0.54 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Flayer Husk relevance 0.49 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Goldwarden's Helm relevance 0.48 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Auxiliary Boosters relevance 0.44 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Bard's Bow relevance 0.43 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Monk's Fist relevance 0.46 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Mandibular Kite relevance 0.41 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Paladin's Arms relevance 0.42 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.40 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.36 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Goldvein Pick relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- White Mage's Staff relevance 0.36 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Greatsword of Tyr relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Glimmerlight relevance 0.34 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Strider Harness relevance 0.33 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Kyoshi Battle Fan relevance 0.31 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Quick-Draw Dagger relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Galadhrim Bow relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Vorrac Battlehorns relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Ecologist's Terrarium relevance 0.27 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kor Halberd relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Malamet Scythe relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Ancestral Katana relevance 0.26 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Paladin's Shield relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Rosethorn Halberd relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Delver's Torch relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bonesplitter relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bramble Armor relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Meltstrider's Gear relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Batterskull relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hedgewitch's Mask relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Pirate's Cutlass relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ninja's Kunai relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Dancer's Chakrams relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Strandwalker relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Necropouncer relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Vulshok Battlegear relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sylvok Lifestaff relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Marauder's Axe relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.41 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.39 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Mammoth Umbra relevance 0.39 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.36 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Airtight Alibi relevance 0.38 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Candlelight Vigil relevance 0.39 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Captured by Lagacs relevance 0.34 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.31 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Benevolent Blessing relevance 0.31 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Vastwood Zendikon relevance 0.37 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Angelic Gift relevance 0.29 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Chains of Custody relevance 0.31 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Knightly Valor relevance 0.34 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Hobble relevance 0.36 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.25 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.24 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Burgeoning relevance 0.33 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Pentarch Ward relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Harmonious Emergence relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Reach for the Sky relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.20 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.20 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.28 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Dog Umbra relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.21 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Sigil of the Nayan Gods relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ethereal Armor relevance 0.18 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Predatory Impetus relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Reprobation relevance 0.25 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.19 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Hyena Umbra relevance 0.22 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Super Strength relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Sheltering Boughs relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Faith's Fetters relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Squire's Devotion relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Asha's Favor relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Maze's Mantle relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Hardened-Scale Armor relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cessation relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Cartouche of Solidarity relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Tall as a Beanstalk relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
All instants (50)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Season of Renewal relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.21 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Angelic Intervention relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Crib Swap relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Battlefield Promotion relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Slash of Light relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Foxfire relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Destroy Evil relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Lightfoot Technique relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Wanderer's Intervention relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Guardians' Pledge relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Karametra's Blessing relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Panoply relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Niveous Wisps relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Lead by Example relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dragonscale Boon relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Strength of Arms relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Repel the Vile relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Battlefield Improvisation relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Big Play relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Arbor Armament relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Charge of the Mites relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Stave Off relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Interjection relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Take Up the Shield relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rebellious Strike relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ray of Revelation relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dazzling Reflection relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Apostle's Blessing relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ethereal Haze relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Kruphix's Insight relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Commune with the Gods relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Imperial Oath relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Shoulder to Shoulder relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Silverflame Ritual relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Benefaction of Rhonas relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bring to Trial relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Remember the Fallen relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Environmental Sciences relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Curse of the Werefox relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rofellos's Gift relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Clowning Around relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Recruitment Drive relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sworn Companions relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Survival Cache relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Caravan Vigil relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Return Triumphant relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Emerge from the Cocoon relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Commune with Spirits relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Travel Preparations relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Aerith Rescue Mission relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Battle Screech relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Cenn's Enlistment relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Now for Wrath, Now for Ruin! relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gather the Townsfolk relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (37)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Sejiri Steppe relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Idyllic Grange relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Sandstone Bridge relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Fair Basilica relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.08 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hidden Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.04 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.03 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.03 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.03 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All lands (39)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.22 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.10 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.09 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Remote Farm relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Windurst, Federation Center relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.04 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.03 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.02 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.02 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.02 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.01 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.01 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.01 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Golden-Tail Trainer, from 28 real Commander decks.