Cards like Otepec Huntmaster
12× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Naya decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
2.3× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Naya decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Naya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.70 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 59%
- Three Visits 49%
- Skyshroud Claim 36%
- Ranger's Path 4%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 2%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
- Hunting Wilds 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Regisaur Alpha
6.3× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Naya decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Naya decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Regisaur Alpha 76%
- Palani's Hatcher 40%
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Naya decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Naya decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 64%
- Rampant Growth 47%
- Kodama's Reach 47%
- Migration Path 21%
- Shared Roots 8%
- Explosive Vegetation 8%
- Traverse the Outlands 7%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Terramorph, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Harvest Season, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Urza's Incubator
16× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Naya decks
Cards
- Urza's Incubator 55%
- Herald's Horn 28%
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
3.7× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Naya decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Naya decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Naya decks
Cards like Devil Dinosaur
6.6× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Naya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Thrash of Raptors
Cards like Silverclad Ferocidons
9.9× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Naya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
3.4× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 82% of other Naya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.86 in other Naya decks
Cards like Atzocan Seer
6.1× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Naya decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
10× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Naya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Naya decks
Cards like Tranquil Frillback
Over 20× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Naya decks
Cards
Cards like Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria
12× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Naya decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Naya decks
Cards like Mirari's Wake
2.9× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Naya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Naya decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Naya decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Flare, Heartbeat of Spring, Dictate of Karametra, Zhur-Taa Ancient
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.4× as likely as other Naya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Naya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Naya decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other Naya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Pantlaza, Sun-Favored relevance 0.44 · 84.9% (191 of 225 decks)
- Temple Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 74.2% (167 of 225 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.35 · 78.2% (176 of 225 decks)
- Goring Ceratops relevance 0.45 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.37 · 69.3% (156 of 225 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.30 · 91.1% (205 of 225 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.38 · 61.8% (139 of 225 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.40 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.34 · 72.0% (162 of 225 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 0.32 · 76.0% (171 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.30 · 81.8% (184 of 225 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.39 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.29 · 84.4% (190 of 225 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.34 · 69.3% (156 of 225 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.35 · 64.4% (145 of 225 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.36 · 62.2% (140 of 225 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.33 · 70.2% (158 of 225 decks)
- Hunting Velociraptor relevance 0.37 · 57.3% (129 of 225 decks)
- Marauding Raptor relevance 0.39 · 53.8% (121 of 225 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.40 · 51.1% (115 of 225 decks)
- Kinjalli's Sunwing relevance 0.37 · 59.1% (133 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.31 · 74.2% (167 of 225 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.45 · 37.3% (84 of 225 decks)
- Kinjalli's Caller relevance 0.45 · 36.4% (82 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.31 · 70.2% (158 of 225 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.35 · 58.7% (132 of 225 decks)
- Wrathful Raptors relevance 0.33 · 64.0% (144 of 225 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.30 · 71.1% (160 of 225 decks)
- Silverclad Ferocidons relevance 0.46 · 29.8% (67 of 225 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.47 · 25.8% (58 of 225 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 58.2% (131 of 225 decks)
- Sawhorn Nemesis relevance 0.48 · 24.4% (55 of 225 decks)
- Polyraptor relevance 0.39 · 43.6% (98 of 225 decks)
- Dinosaurs on a Spaceship relevance 0.38 · 46.2% (104 of 225 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 0.51 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 0.34 · 55.1% (124 of 225 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.37 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 0.36 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.42 · 33.3% (75 of 225 decks)
- Rampaging Ferocidon relevance 0.48 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.41 · 34.7% (78 of 225 decks)
- Carnage Tyrant relevance 0.46 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Ravenous Tyrannosaurus relevance 0.38 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Sunfrill Imitator relevance 0.36 · 45.8% (103 of 225 decks)
- Trapjaw Tyrant relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.37 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.34 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- Devil Dinosaur relevance 0.43 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Pantlaza, Sun-Favored relevance 0.44 · 84.9% (191 of 225 decks)
- Temple Altisaur relevance 0.37 · 74.2% (167 of 225 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.35 · 78.2% (176 of 225 decks)
- Goring Ceratops relevance 0.45 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.37 · 69.3% (156 of 225 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.30 · 91.1% (205 of 225 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.38 · 61.8% (139 of 225 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.34 · 72.0% (162 of 225 decks)
- Regisaur Alpha relevance 0.32 · 76.0% (171 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.30 · 81.8% (184 of 225 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.39 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.29 · 84.4% (190 of 225 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.34 · 69.3% (156 of 225 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.35 · 64.4% (145 of 225 decks)
- Wakening Sun's Avatar relevance 0.36 · 62.2% (140 of 225 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.33 · 70.2% (158 of 225 decks)
- Hunting Velociraptor relevance 0.37 · 57.3% (129 of 225 decks)
- Marauding Raptor relevance 0.39 · 53.8% (121 of 225 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.40 · 51.1% (115 of 225 decks)
- Kinjalli's Sunwing relevance 0.37 · 59.1% (133 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.31 · 74.2% (167 of 225 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.45 · 37.3% (84 of 225 decks)
- Kinjalli's Caller relevance 0.45 · 36.4% (82 of 225 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.31 · 70.2% (158 of 225 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.35 · 58.7% (132 of 225 decks)
- Wrathful Raptors relevance 0.33 · 64.0% (144 of 225 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.30 · 71.1% (160 of 225 decks)
- Silverclad Ferocidons relevance 0.46 · 29.8% (67 of 225 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.47 · 25.8% (58 of 225 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 58.2% (131 of 225 decks)
- Sawhorn Nemesis relevance 0.48 · 24.4% (55 of 225 decks)
- Polyraptor relevance 0.39 · 43.6% (98 of 225 decks)
- Dinosaurs on a Spaceship relevance 0.38 · 46.2% (104 of 225 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 0.51 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 0.34 · 55.1% (124 of 225 decks)
- Otepec Huntmaster relevance 0.37 · 48.0% (108 of 225 decks)
- Bonehoard Dracosaur relevance 0.36 · 49.8% (112 of 225 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.42 · 33.3% (75 of 225 decks)
- Rampaging Ferocidon relevance 0.48 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Carnage Tyrant relevance 0.46 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Ravenous Tyrannosaurus relevance 0.38 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Sunfrill Imitator relevance 0.36 · 45.8% (103 of 225 decks)
- Trapjaw Tyrant relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 0.44 · 24.0% (54 of 225 decks)
- Trumpeting Carnosaur relevance 0.34 · 49.3% (111 of 225 decks)
- Devil Dinosaur relevance 0.43 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Atzocan Seer relevance 0.41 · 30.2% (68 of 225 decks)
- Majestic Heliopterus relevance 0.46 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Ripjaw Raptor relevance 0.39 · 32.4% (73 of 225 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.40 · 29.8% (67 of 225 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.40 · 54.7% (123 of 225 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.41 · 34.7% (78 of 225 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.39 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.34 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.27 · 36.4% (82 of 225 decks)
- Dino DNA relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.33 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.33 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Progenitor's Icon relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 11.1% (25 of 225 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Pillar of Origins relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Talisman of Conviction relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.15 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 73.3% (165 of 225 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 90.2% (203 of 225 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.37 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Poetic Ingenuity relevance 0.44 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.36 · 23.1% (52 of 225 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.22 · 67.6% (152 of 225 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.36 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.31 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Shadow in the Warp relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.37 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- World War Hulk relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Duelist's Heritage relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.16 · 71.6% (161 of 225 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.26 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- From the Rubble relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.28 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Sunbird's Invocation relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Collective Inferno relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Annie Joins Up relevance 0.18 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.31 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Life Finds a Way relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Aggravated Assault relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Rising of the Day relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All instants (49)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.20 · 53.3% (120 of 225 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.27 · 23.6% (53 of 225 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.26 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Dinosaur Stampede relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.24 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.22 · 30.2% (68 of 225 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.23 · 27.6% (62 of 225 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 0.18 · 40.9% (92 of 225 decks)
- Dreadmaw's Ire relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Seething Song relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Not of This World relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.20 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Reinforcements relevance 0.36 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Savage Beating relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (27 of 225 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 54.2% (122 of 225 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.11 · 47.1% (106 of 225 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.09 · 47.1% (106 of 225 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.20 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.43 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.38 · 36.0% (81 of 225 decks)
- Savage Order relevance 0.37 · 36.9% (83 of 225 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.42 · 21.3% (48 of 225 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.26 · 46.7% (105 of 225 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.36 · 15.1% (34 of 225 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Don't Move relevance 0.39 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 24.9% (56 of 225 decks)
- Star of Extinction relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.39 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.27 · 21.8% (49 of 225 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.16 · 64.0% (144 of 225 decks)
- Triumphant Chomp relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.19 · 47.1% (106 of 225 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 48.9% (110 of 225 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.30 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.13 · 67.1% (151 of 225 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 59.1% (133 of 225 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.20 · 20.9% (47 of 225 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.21 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.22 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Huatli, Warrior Poet relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (16 of 225 decks)
- Huatli, Dinosaur Knight relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 0.34 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Huatli, Radiant Champion relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.38 · 25.3% (57 of 225 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.31 · 51.1% (115 of 225 decks)
- Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion relevance 0.41 · 16.4% (37 of 225 decks)
- Restless Ridgeline relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.36 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.38 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.26 · 28.9% (65 of 225 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 59.6% (134 of 225 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.20 · 48.4% (109 of 225 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.29 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.31 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.23 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.29 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.22 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (19 of 225 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.28 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (23 of 225 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.19 · 19.6% (44 of 225 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Sundering Eruption // Volcanic Fissure relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.12 · 56.4% (127 of 225 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Elegant Parlor relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (10 of 225 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Shinka, the Bloodsoaked Keep relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (11 of 225 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.28 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Spinerock Knoll relevance 0.24 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Slayers' Stronghold relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 225 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (5 of 225 decks)
All lands (50)
- Welcome to . . . // Jurassic Park relevance 0.41 · 38.2% (86 of 225 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.34 · 44.4% (100 of 225 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.33 · 38.7% (87 of 225 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (45 of 225 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.30 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.30 · 17.3% (39 of 225 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.30 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.34 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.30 · 11.6% (26 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.27 · 14.7% (33 of 225 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (14 of 225 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.29 · 9.8% (22 of 225 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.24 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Plateau relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (30 of 225 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (18 of 225 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (21 of 225 decks)
- Radiant Summit relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (28 of 225 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (46 of 225 decks)
- Needleverge Pathway // Pillarverge Pathway relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Alpine Meadow relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Furycalm Snarl relevance 0.22 · 14.2% (32 of 225 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (31 of 225 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 225 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.18 · 31.1% (70 of 225 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (12 of 225 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.20 · 17.8% (40 of 225 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (20 of 225 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (15 of 225 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.25 · 5.8% (13 of 225 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 18.2% (41 of 225 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.16 · 37.8% (85 of 225 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (9 of 225 decks)
- Sundown Pass relevance 0.19 · 16.0% (36 of 225 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (17 of 225 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (7 of 225 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (24 of 225 decks)
- Jungle Shrine relevance 0.13 · 52.4% (118 of 225 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Gishath, Sun's Avatar, from 225 real Commander decks.