Cards like Master of the Pearl Trident
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
91% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
4.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Deeproot Pilgrimage
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
80% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Deeproot Elite
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Vineshaper Mystic
Cards like Ephemerate
9.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 46%
- Cloudshift 26%
- Scrollshift 11%
- Blur 6%
- Momentary Blink 6%
Other options: Justiciar's Portal, Acrobatic Maneuver, Turn to Mist, Flicker of Fate, Liberate
Cards like Kindred Discovery
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
2.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Bant decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 51%
- Three Visits 49%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Skyshroud Claim, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Seafloor Oracle
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Eclipsed Merrow
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Eclipsed Merrow 43%
- Tidal Courier 11%
Cards like Kumena, Tyrant of Orazca
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Chronicle of Victory
12× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Instruments of War, Obelisk of Urd, Brass Herald
Cards like Deepway Navigator
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Silvergill Mentor
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Harmonized Crescendo
18× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Teleportation Circle
7.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 43%
- Kodama's Reach 23%
- Rampant Growth 17%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Shared Roots, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Counterspell
1.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Counterspell 49%
- Negate 14%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Mist Dancer
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Namor the Sub-Mariner
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Patchwork Banner
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Caged Sun, Gauntlet of Power, Hall of Triumph
Cards like Roaming Throne
7.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
4.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards like Dovin's Veto
3.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Bant decks
Cards like Bident of Thassa
2.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Kiora's Follower
2.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Nimbleclaw Adept, Clever Conjurer, Vizier of Tumbling Sands, Kelpie Guide, North Pole Patrol, Ioreth of the Healing House
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 23%
- Pongify 6%
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Bant decks
All top picks (50)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.47 · 88.6% (31 of 35 decks)
- Vodalian Wave-Knight relevance 0.49 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.47 · 85.7% (30 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.49 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.47 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.49 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Kumena, Tyrant of Orazca relevance 0.47 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Emperor Mihail II relevance 0.47 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Svyelun of Sea and Sky relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Reejerey relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.47 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Deepchannel Duelist relevance 0.46 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Seafloor Oracle relevance 0.47 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Merfolk Sovereign relevance 0.46 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Vodalian Hexcatcher relevance 0.45 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Deepway Navigator relevance 0.46 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Adept Watershaper relevance 0.40 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Singer of Swift Rivers relevance 0.46 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Sygg's Command relevance 0.44 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Schoolmaster relevance 0.42 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Sygg, River Guide relevance 0.45 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.43 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Merfolk Mistbinder relevance 0.44 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Meanders Guide relevance 0.45 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Judge of Currents relevance 0.45 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.47 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Mist Dancer relevance 0.44 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Eclipsed Merrow relevance 0.43 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.42 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Forerunner of the Heralds relevance 0.43 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Elite relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.33 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Disruptor of Currents relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.42 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Wanderwine Prophets relevance 0.42 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Attuma, Atlantean Warlord relevance 0.43 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Summon the School relevance 0.41 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.41 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Mindspring Merfolk relevance 0.42 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Seahunter relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 0.40 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Namor the Sub-Mariner relevance 0.42 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.35 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Harpoon Sniper relevance 0.40 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Sygg, Wanderwine Wisdom // Sygg, Wanderbrine Shield relevance 0.35 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Wanderwine Farewell relevance 0.39 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.38 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Wayfinder relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.47 · 88.6% (31 of 35 decks)
- Vodalian Wave-Knight relevance 0.49 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.49 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Kumena, Tyrant of Orazca relevance 0.47 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Emperor Mihail II relevance 0.47 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Svyelun of Sea and Sky relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Reejerey relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Banneret relevance 0.47 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.46 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Deepchannel Duelist relevance 0.46 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Seafloor Oracle relevance 0.47 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Merfolk Sovereign relevance 0.46 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Vodalian Hexcatcher relevance 0.45 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Deepway Navigator relevance 0.46 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Adept Watershaper relevance 0.40 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Singer of Swift Rivers relevance 0.46 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Stonybrook Schoolmaster relevance 0.42 · 62.9% (22 of 35 decks)
- Sygg, River Guide relevance 0.45 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.43 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Merfolk Mistbinder relevance 0.44 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Meanders Guide relevance 0.45 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Judge of Currents relevance 0.45 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Mist Dancer relevance 0.44 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Eclipsed Merrow relevance 0.43 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Thieving Skydiver relevance 0.42 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Forerunner of the Heralds relevance 0.43 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Elite relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.33 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Disruptor of Currents relevance 0.41 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Historian relevance 0.42 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Wanderwine Prophets relevance 0.42 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Attuma, Atlantean Warlord relevance 0.43 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Lullmage Mentor relevance 0.41 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Mindspring Merfolk relevance 0.42 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Seahunter relevance 0.42 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Harbinger relevance 0.40 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Namor the Sub-Mariner relevance 0.42 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.35 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Harpoon Sniper relevance 0.40 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Sygg, Wanderwine Wisdom // Sygg, Wanderbrine Shield relevance 0.35 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 0.38 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Wayfinder relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Champions of the Shoal relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.25 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Silvergill Adept relevance 0.36 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Surgespanner relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Coralhelm Commander relevance 0.34 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Sygg, River Cutthroat relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Tidal Courier relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.33 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.24 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.28 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.19 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.19 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Umezawa's Jitte relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.14 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Mirror of the Forebears relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.14 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Mindlink Mech relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.11 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Lifecraft Engine relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.10 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.09 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.08 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- The Arkenstone // Seek the Heart relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.07 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.07 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.03 · 71.4% (25 of 35 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.02 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.47 · 85.7% (30 of 35 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.49 · 80.0% (28 of 35 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.47 · 82.9% (29 of 35 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.24 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Spreading Seas relevance 0.34 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.21 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Aquatic Incursion relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Radiant Destiny relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Lingering Mirage relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- A Killer Among Us relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Sea's Claim relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Renewed Solidarity relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.13 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Shared Triumph relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Ajani's Mantra relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.12 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Aether Barrier relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.10 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Liminal Hold relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Alpha Status relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.11 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.11 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Glare of Subdual relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Far Traveler relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.08 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Dazzling Theater // Prop Room relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- City of Death relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.07 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All instants (50)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.26 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.21 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Scrollshift relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Personify relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.20 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.19 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.14 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.13 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- And They Shall Know No Fear relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.16 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Meddle relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.13 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Whim of Volrath relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Lae'zel's Acrobatics relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.11 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.13 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.08 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Protective Response relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Riverguard's Reflexes relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Momentary Blink relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Pause for Reflection relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.07 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Getaway Glamer relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.08 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Azorius Charm relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.09 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Crib Swap relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All sorceries (49)
- Sygg's Command relevance 0.44 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.47 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Summon the School relevance 0.41 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Wanderwine Farewell relevance 0.39 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.21 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Winnowing relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Crashing Tide relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.10 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.11 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.06 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.08 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Another Round relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.07 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Venser, the Sojourner relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.28 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Umara Wizard // Umara Skyfalls relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.15 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.15 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.09 · 65.7% (23 of 35 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.10 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.10 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.10 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.08 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.08 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.07 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Restless Anchorage relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.06 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.06 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All lands (50)
- Wanderwine Hub relevance 0.43 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.32 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.23 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.19 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.23 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.22 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.16 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.10 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 48.6% (17 of 35 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.07 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 77.1% (27 of 35 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.09 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.09 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.07 · 68.6% (24 of 35 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.09 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Nimbus Maze relevance 0.13 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.12 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.11 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Twists and Turns // Mycoid Maze relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.11 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (7 of 35 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Turbulent Shore relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.06 · 45.7% (16 of 35 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.05 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.08 · 11.4% (4 of 35 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Shimmerdrift Vale relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.08 · 8.6% (3 of 35 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.09 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.05 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Scholar of Seas, from 35 real Commander decks.