Change per day
Archetypes
49% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Deadly Recluse
49% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 77 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Penumbra Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Penumbra Spider 39%
- Brood Weaver 36%
Cards like Deadly Recluse
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Deadly Recluse 42%
- Kessig Recluse 26%
- Dragon Sniper 3%
- Ankle Biter 2%
Other options: Kraul Stinger, Tajuru Blightblade, Underdark Basilisk, Greater Basilisk, Moss Viper, Fang of Shigeki, Daggerback Basilisk, Sedge Scorpion
Cards like Doubling Season
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Doubling Season 35%
- Parallel Lives 31%
- Primal Vigor 6%
Cards like Netcaster Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Netcaster Spider 18%
- Snarespinner 16%
- Frostweb Spider 9%
- Woolly Spider 5%
Other options: Ezuri's Archers, High-Rise Sawjack, Skystinger
Cards like Treetop Snarespinner
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Intrepid Tenderfoot, Jungle Delver, Carnivorous Moss-Beast, Toadstool Admirer, Hungry Megasloth, Guardian of the Halls
Cards like Fog
6.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 35%
- Terrifying Presence 14%
- Pause for Reflection 4%
- Root Snare 3%
- Lull 3%
- Thwart the Enemy 2%
- Moment's Peace 2%
- Haze of Pollen 2%
- Hunter's Ambush 1%
Other options: Winds of Qal Sisma, Serene Sunset, Hindervines, Tanglesap, Vine Snare
Cards like Skysnare Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Skysnare Spider 24%
- Sentinel Spider 18%
Other options: Greenwood Sentinel, Mosscoat Goriak, Wary Okapi, Oakgnarl Warrior, Brushstrider, Bitterbow Sharpshooters, Elfhame Wurm, Vigilant Baloth, Woodland Patrol, Tajuru Pathwarden
Cards like Patchwork Banner
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
- Patchwork Banner 19%
- Heraldic Banner 17%
- Caged Sun 9%
- Hall of Triumph 2%
Other options: Gauntlet of Power
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
8.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overrun
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Stingerfling Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 64% of other green decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 47% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 1.6 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 50%
- Kodama's Reach 40%
- Explosive Vegetation 8%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Harvest Season 4%
- Far Wanderings 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Migration Path 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Celebrate the Harvest, Reshape the Earth, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Boundless Realms, Map the Frontier, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Slimefoot's Survey, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 41%
- Three Visits 31%
- Skyshroud Claim 18%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 4%
- Field Trip 1%
Other options: Glimpse the Core, Ranger's Path, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Krosan Grip
3.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 20%
- Naturalize 15%
- Wilt 2%
Other options: Relic Crush, Wear Away, Oxidize, Stomp and Howl, Natural Reclamation, Break Asunder, Verdigris
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Ohran Viper
Cards like Silklash Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Return to Nature
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.83 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.82 · 38.7% (79 of 204 decks)
- Brood Weaver relevance 0.83 · 36.3% (74 of 204 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.78 · 37.7% (77 of 204 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 0.73 · 32.8% (67 of 204 decks)
- Arachnus Spinner relevance 0.79 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.75 · 26.5% (54 of 204 decks)
- Stingerfling Spider relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Juvenile Gloomwidow relevance 0.77 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Acid Web Spider relevance 0.73 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 0.63 · 37.3% (76 of 204 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 0.72 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.73 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.65 · 27.9% (57 of 204 decks)
- Skysnare Spider relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Netcaster Spider relevance 0.71 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Glint Weaver relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Arachnus Web relevance 0.68 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.55 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (68 of 204 decks)
- Llanowar Greenwidow relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Kessig Recluse relevance 0.61 · 26.5% (54 of 204 decks)
- Snarespinner relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Sentinel Spider relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Sporecap Spider relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Oran-Rief Recluse relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.40 · 57.8% (118 of 204 decks)
- Giant Spider relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Gnottvold Recluse relevance 0.63 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Eaten by Spiders relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Frostweb Spider relevance 0.65 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Canopy Spider relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Hoarding Recluse relevance 0.54 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Archweaver relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (32 of 204 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Ruins Recluse relevance 0.51 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Treetop Snarespinner relevance 0.48 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Hidden Spider relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.40 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Gloomwidow relevance 0.63 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Swift Spinner relevance 0.60 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Mammoth Spider relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.41 · 34.8% (71 of 204 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.58 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Hitchclaw Recluse relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Spider-Mobile relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Goliath Spider relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Tangle Spider relevance 0.57 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 0.83 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 0.82 · 38.7% (79 of 204 decks)
- Brood Weaver relevance 0.83 · 36.3% (74 of 204 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 0.73 · 32.8% (67 of 204 decks)
- Arachnus Spinner relevance 0.79 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Chainweb Aracnir relevance 0.75 · 26.5% (54 of 204 decks)
- Stingerfling Spider relevance 0.75 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Juvenile Gloomwidow relevance 0.77 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Acid Web Spider relevance 0.73 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 0.63 · 37.3% (76 of 204 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 0.72 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.65 · 27.9% (57 of 204 decks)
- Skysnare Spider relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Netcaster Spider relevance 0.71 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Glint Weaver relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.55 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Silklash Spider relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (68 of 204 decks)
- Llanowar Greenwidow relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Kessig Recluse relevance 0.61 · 26.5% (54 of 204 decks)
- Snarespinner relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Sentinel Spider relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Sporecap Spider relevance 0.66 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Oran-Rief Recluse relevance 0.68 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Giant Spider relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Gnottvold Recluse relevance 0.63 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Frostweb Spider relevance 0.65 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Canopy Spider relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Hoarding Recluse relevance 0.54 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Archweaver relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.54 · 15.7% (32 of 204 decks)
- Spiders-Man, Heroic Horde relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Ruins Recluse relevance 0.51 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Treetop Snarespinner relevance 0.48 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.40 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Gloomwidow relevance 0.63 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Swift Spinner relevance 0.60 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Mammoth Spider relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.41 · 34.8% (71 of 204 decks)
- Ezekiel Sims, Spider-Totem relevance 0.58 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Hitchclaw Recluse relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Goliath Spider relevance 0.58 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Tangle Spider relevance 0.57 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 0.42 · 25.5% (52 of 204 decks)
- Jungle Weaver relevance 0.56 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Woolly Spider relevance 0.57 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Somberwald Spider relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Mineshaft Spider relevance 0.54 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Root Spider relevance 0.57 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Webspinner Cuff relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Cactarantula relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
All artifacts (45)
- Spider-Mobile relevance 0.58 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Isolation Cell relevance 0.55 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.30 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.29 · 19.1% (39 of 204 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.30 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.20 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Obelisk of Urd relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Well of Lost Dreams relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (68 of 204 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Wurm's Tooth relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 50.5% (103 of 204 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Hall of Triumph relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.11 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 60.8% (124 of 204 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 0.78 · 37.7% (77 of 204 decks)
- Wall Crawl relevance 0.73 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Arachnus Web relevance 0.68 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Hidden Spider relevance 0.61 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.40 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Snake Pit relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.29 · 41.7% (85 of 204 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.30 · 31.4% (64 of 204 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.26 · 36.8% (75 of 204 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.32 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.28 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.23 · 34.8% (71 of 204 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.29 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Fecundity relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Leyline of Vitality relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Eyes of the Wisent relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.18 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Bower Passage relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- The Hunger Tide Rises relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Lifeforce relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Elephant Grass relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.17 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Arachnoform relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.19 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.15 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
All instants (50)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.40 · 57.8% (118 of 204 decks)
- Eaten by Spiders relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Gloomwidow's Feast relevance 0.55 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Grow Extra Arms relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.30 · 37.3% (76 of 204 decks)
- Spidery Grasp relevance 0.46 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.25 · 31.4% (64 of 204 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.31 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.28 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Blunt the Assault relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.24 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.20 · 35.3% (72 of 204 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Pause for Reflection relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.19 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Vines of the Recluse relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Root Snare relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Appetite for the Unnatural relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.14 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Thwart the Enemy relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 27.9% (57 of 204 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Seedtime relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.13 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.34 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.28 · 24.5% (50 of 204 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.28 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.19 · 42.2% (86 of 204 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (13 of 204 decks)
- Nature's Spiral relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 36.8% (75 of 204 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.21 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.23 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (25 of 204 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.17 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (102 of 204 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Healing Technique relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 31.4% (64 of 204 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 41.2% (84 of 204 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (15 of 204 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.10 · 51.5% (105 of 204 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (14 of 204 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (11 of 204 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.13 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.10 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.45 · 43.6% (89 of 204 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.26 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.20 · 33.8% (69 of 204 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.29 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.21 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Radiant Fountain relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (8 of 204 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.12 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (7 of 204 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (9 of 204 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.10 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.11 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.18 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (16 of 204 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (34 of 204 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (12 of 204 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (10 of 204 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (17 of 204 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (5 of 204 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.3% (176 of 204 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Arasta of the Endless Web, from 204 real Commander decks.