Replication Technique
Played in 5,775 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3026+11+2+3+4+6+16+8+
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
0.41| 7.3%
$0.35 · €0.19$29.77 · €31.11
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 3.81 · 36.3% (1,738 of 4,793 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.72 · 31.0% (2,181 of 7,038 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 1.56 · 10.5% (163 of 1,553 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.47 · 9.4% (164 of 1,752 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 1.04 · 7.8% (52 of 669 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 0.92 · 6.7% (44 of 659 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.89 · 4.0% (155 of 3,867 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.80 · 8.3% (18 of 216 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.78 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.75 · 4.8% (43 of 892 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (6 of 35 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.73 · 5.1% (33 of 643 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.68 · 2.7% (167 of 6,268 decks)
- Gor Muldrak, Amphinologist relevance 0.63 · 3.5% (48 of 1,355 decks)
- Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief relevance 0.63 · 2.8% (91 of 3,248 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.58 · 3.3% (40 of 1,202 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.55 · 4.5% (17 of 376 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (6 of 73 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (19 of 662 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (4 of 55 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.39 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (13 of 466 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (4 of 68 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.33 · 1.7% (31 of 1,794 decks)
- Absorbing Man relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (8 of 258 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (3 of 60 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.26 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Tanazir Quandrix relevance 0.24 · 1.9% (9 of 465 decks)
- The Third Doctor // K-9, Mark I relevance 0.22 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.41 · 36.3% (2,099 of 5,775 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.41 · 36.6% (2,113 of 5,775 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 1.35 · 41.0% (2,370 of 5,775 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.33 · 36.3% (2,097 of 5,775 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.31 · 35.6% (2,057 of 5,775 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.29 · 34.8% (2,008 of 5,775 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.26 · 35.5% (2,048 of 5,775 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.21 · 29.2% (1,687 of 5,775 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.19 · 37.7% (2,180 of 5,775 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 1.17 · 42.0% (2,424 of 5,775 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.15 · 34.8% (2,011 of 5,775 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.14 · 35.4% (2,045 of 5,775 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.10 · 24.1% (1,393 of 5,775 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 1.09 · 25.7% (1,485 of 5,775 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 53.1% (3,069 of 5,775 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.08 · 51.7% (2,985 of 5,775 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.06 · 25.3% (1,461 of 5,775 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 1.03 · 36.7% (2,118 of 5,775 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.01 · 32.1% (1,852 of 5,775 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.00 · 52.6% (3,035 of 5,775 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.00 · 37.0% (2,137 of 5,775 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.99 · 33.5% (1,933 of 5,775 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.97 · 28.1% (1,623 of 5,775 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (1,298 of 5,775 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.96 · 44.9% (2,595 of 5,775 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.96 · 20.3% (1,174 of 5,775 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 1.41 · 36.3% (2,099 of 5,775 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.31 · 35.6% (2,057 of 5,775 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.29 · 34.8% (2,008 of 5,775 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 1.26 · 35.5% (2,048 of 5,775 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 1.09 · 25.7% (1,485 of 5,775 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 53.1% (3,069 of 5,775 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.08 · 51.7% (2,985 of 5,775 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 1.06 · 25.3% (1,461 of 5,775 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.00 · 52.6% (3,035 of 5,775 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.99 · 33.5% (1,933 of 5,775 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 0.97 · 28.1% (1,623 of 5,775 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.15 · 34.8% (2,011 of 5,775 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 1.03 · 36.7% (2,118 of 5,775 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Copy Land relevance 1.41 · 36.6% (2,113 of 5,775 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 1.14 · 35.4% (2,045 of 5,775 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.10 · 24.1% (1,393 of 5,775 decks)
All instants (4)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 1.01 · 32.1% (1,852 of 5,775 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.97 · 22.5% (1,298 of 5,775 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.96 · 44.9% (2,595 of 5,775 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.96 · 20.3% (1,174 of 5,775 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 1.35 · 41.0% (2,370 of 5,775 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.33 · 36.3% (2,097 of 5,775 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.21 · 29.2% (1,687 of 5,775 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.19 · 37.7% (2,180 of 5,775 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 1.17 · 42.0% (2,424 of 5,775 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 1.00 · 37.0% (2,137 of 5,775 decks)
All utility lands (16)
- Trenchpost relevance 1.35 · 34.7% (2,005 of 5,775 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.29 · 32.0% (1,846 of 5,775 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 1.26 · 31.4% (1,811 of 5,775 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.25 · 34.9% (2,015 of 5,775 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.21 · 41.4% (2,388 of 5,775 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 1.21 · 35.2% (2,032 of 5,775 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 1.15 · 37.0% (2,134 of 5,775 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 1.12 · 32.2% (1,858 of 5,775 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 1.11 · 26.4% (1,524 of 5,775 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.07 · 25.2% (1,454 of 5,775 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.05 · 36.7% (2,122 of 5,775 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 1.02 · 25.6% (1,478 of 5,775 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.97 · 23.9% (1,379 of 5,775 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.96 · 24.1% (1,392 of 5,775 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.96 · 22.6% (1,304 of 5,775 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.95 · 22.4% (1,293 of 5,775 decks)
All lands (8)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.37 · 36.6% (2,114 of 5,775 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 1.36 · 39.0% (2,253 of 5,775 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.34 · 37.9% (2,189 of 5,775 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.27 · 40.8% (2,355 of 5,775 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 1.26 · 38.8% (2,239 of 5,775 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 1.25 · 38.7% (2,235 of 5,775 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 1.25 · 38.9% (2,249 of 5,775 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.12 · 37.6% (2,171 of 5,775 decks)
EDH data for Replication Technique: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,775 real decks.




















































































