Epicenter
Played in 148 Naya decks
126+9+3+4+10+21+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Impending Disaster 56.1% of decks
Impending Disaster 56.1% of decks
Boom // Bust 56.8% of decks
Boom // Bust 56.8% of decks
Armageddon 75.7% of decks
Armageddon 75.7% of decks
Catastrophe 54.7% of decks
Catastrophe 54.7% of decks
Cataclysm 42.6% of decks
Cataclysm 42.6% of decks
Ravages of War 41.9% of decks
Ravages of War 41.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.03 · 2.0% (90 of 4,441 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Impending Disaster relevance 3.77 · 56.1% (83 of 148 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 3.71 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 3.59 · 75.7% (112 of 148 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 3.49 · 54.7% (81 of 148 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 2.84 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.47 · 62.2% (92 of 148 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.42 · 64.9% (96 of 148 decks)
- Ruination relevance 2.33 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 2.23 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.14 · 66.2% (98 of 148 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 2.05 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.03 · 63.5% (94 of 148 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.96 · 50.0% (74 of 148 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.89 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 1.74 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.69 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.69 · 37.8% (56 of 148 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.67 · 45.3% (67 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.65 · 50.7% (75 of 148 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 1.64 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.58 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 1.54 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.52 · 58.1% (86 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.14 · 66.2% (98 of 148 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.09 · 58.8% (87 of 148 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.03 · 63.5% (94 of 148 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.89 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.69 · 40.5% (60 of 148 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.69 · 37.8% (56 of 148 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.65 · 50.7% (75 of 148 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.58 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.48 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 2.05 · 52.7% (78 of 148 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.67 · 45.3% (67 of 148 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.52 · 58.1% (86 of 148 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Impending Disaster relevance 3.77 · 56.1% (83 of 148 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.42 · 64.9% (96 of 148 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 2.23 · 35.8% (53 of 148 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 1.54 · 24.3% (36 of 148 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Boom // Bust relevance 3.71 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 3.59 · 75.7% (112 of 148 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 3.49 · 54.7% (81 of 148 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 2.84 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (62 of 148 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 2.47 · 62.2% (92 of 148 decks)
- Ruination relevance 2.33 · 35.1% (52 of 148 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.96 · 50.0% (74 of 148 decks)
- Jokulhaups relevance 1.74 · 25.7% (38 of 148 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 1.64 · 25.0% (37 of 148 decks)
All utility lands (21)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 2.64 · 77.0% (114 of 148 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 2.55 · 75.0% (111 of 148 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 2.50 · 73.0% (108 of 148 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 2.44 · 72.3% (107 of 148 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.43 · 71.6% (106 of 148 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 2.38 · 70.3% (104 of 148 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.36 · 74.3% (110 of 148 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.35 · 74.3% (110 of 148 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.32 · 73.0% (108 of 148 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 2.29 · 65.5% (97 of 148 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 2.29 · 56.8% (84 of 148 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 2.24 · 64.9% (96 of 148 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.19 · 62.8% (93 of 148 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 2.11 · 57.4% (85 of 148 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 2.00 · 48.0% (71 of 148 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.86 · 51.4% (76 of 148 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.84 · 46.6% (69 of 148 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.76 · 42.6% (63 of 148 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 1.68 · 39.2% (58 of 148 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.65 · 39.9% (59 of 148 decks)
- Hostile Desert relevance 1.48 · 32.4% (48 of 148 decks)
All lands (3)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 2.40 · 62.8% (93 of 148 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 2.21 · 62.8% (93 of 148 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 2.19 · 59.5% (88 of 148 decks)
EDH data for Epicenter: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 148 real decks.













































