Elvish Guidance
Played in 3,801 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
28.3% Green
All commanders (30)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 4.09 · 51.4% (696 of 1,355 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 3.61 · 27.4% (1,155 of 4,211 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 3.17 · 45.0% (194 of 431 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 2.90 · 25.0% (349 of 1,398 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 2.81 · 48.7% (96 of 197 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.28 · 12.7% (394 of 3,092 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.95 · 25.8% (48 of 186 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.92 · 33.7% (32 of 95 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.89 · 12.2% (154 of 1,263 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.42 · 8.6% (85 of 984 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 1.31 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 1.29 · 10.7% (38 of 355 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.13 · 9.4% (29 of 310 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 1.11 · 50.0% (5 of 10 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Master Chef relevance 1.00 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.95 · 12.9% (11 of 85 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.83 · 2.8% (139 of 5,018 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.72 · 19.0% (4 of 21 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.71 · 4.5% (22 of 487 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.68 · 4.0% (24 of 605 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (3 of 13 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.64 · 9.1% (6 of 66 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.49 · 2.3% (26 of 1,115 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.38 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.34 · 2.0% (11 of 539 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.17 · 1.3% (5 of 388 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.30 · 90.8% (3,450 of 3,801 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.12 · 61.4% (2,333 of 3,801 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.08 · 65.5% (2,490 of 3,801 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.08 · 91.5% (3,477 of 3,801 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.07 · 66.7% (2,536 of 3,801 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.97 · 54.1% (2,055 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.92 · 57.0% (2,166 of 3,801 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.76 · 48.5% (1,843 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.72 · 47.5% (1,805 of 3,801 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.72 · 45.3% (1,723 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.72 · 49.8% (1,891 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.69 · 43.1% (1,637 of 3,801 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.68 · 44.1% (1,677 of 3,801 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.65 · 44.3% (1,682 of 3,801 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.65 · 42.0% (1,595 of 3,801 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.61 · 44.3% (1,685 of 3,801 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.59 · 43.8% (1,665 of 3,801 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.59 · 46.9% (1,783 of 3,801 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.57 · 50.1% (1,903 of 3,801 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.48 · 48.6% (1,846 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.48 · 46.8% (1,777 of 3,801 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.45 · 40.2% (1,527 of 3,801 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.37 · 36.0% (1,369 of 3,801 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.31 · 39.2% (1,489 of 3,801 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.30 · 33.5% (1,274 of 3,801 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.29 · 62.1% (2,360 of 3,801 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.22 · 30.3% (1,153 of 3,801 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.21 · 48.5% (1,845 of 3,801 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.16 · 64.3% (2,444 of 3,801 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.13 · 33.3% (1,264 of 3,801 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.30 · 90.8% (3,450 of 3,801 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.12 · 61.4% (2,333 of 3,801 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.08 · 65.5% (2,490 of 3,801 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.08 · 91.5% (3,477 of 3,801 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.07 · 66.7% (2,536 of 3,801 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.97 · 54.1% (2,055 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.92 · 57.0% (2,166 of 3,801 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.76 · 48.5% (1,843 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.72 · 47.5% (1,805 of 3,801 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.72 · 45.3% (1,723 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.72 · 49.8% (1,891 of 3,801 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.68 · 44.1% (1,677 of 3,801 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.65 · 44.3% (1,682 of 3,801 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.61 · 44.3% (1,685 of 3,801 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.59 · 43.8% (1,665 of 3,801 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.59 · 46.9% (1,783 of 3,801 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.57 · 50.1% (1,903 of 3,801 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.48 · 48.6% (1,846 of 3,801 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.48 · 46.8% (1,777 of 3,801 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.45 · 40.2% (1,527 of 3,801 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.37 · 36.0% (1,369 of 3,801 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.31 · 39.2% (1,489 of 3,801 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.30 · 33.5% (1,274 of 3,801 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.29 · 62.1% (2,360 of 3,801 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.22 · 30.3% (1,153 of 3,801 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.21 · 48.5% (1,845 of 3,801 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.16 · 64.3% (2,444 of 3,801 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.13 · 33.3% (1,264 of 3,801 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.09 · 28.5% (1,084 of 3,801 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.06 · 47.2% (1,795 of 3,801 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.04 · 36.0% (1,368 of 3,801 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.04 · 66.2% (2,515 of 3,801 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.99 · 31.8% (1,209 of 3,801 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.95 · 74.6% (2,835 of 3,801 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.95 · 27.2% (1,032 of 3,801 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.94 · 22.5% (857 of 3,801 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.92 · 76.3% (2,900 of 3,801 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.92 · 27.1% (1,029 of 3,801 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.91 · 19.8% (753 of 3,801 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.91 · 38.3% (1,456 of 3,801 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.90 · 35.2% (1,338 of 3,801 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.86 · 34.8% (1,324 of 3,801 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.03 · 36.4% (1,384 of 3,801 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.97 · 30.7% (1,166 of 3,801 decks)
All instants (3)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.65 · 42.0% (1,595 of 3,801 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.11 · 30.0% (1,139 of 3,801 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.04 · 31.4% (1,193 of 3,801 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.69 · 43.1% (1,637 of 3,801 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.09 · 30.8% (1,172 of 3,801 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.74 · 60.8% (2,310 of 3,801 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Guidance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,801 real decks.