Caustic Crawler
Played in 172 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
10.9% Sultai
- Golgari 514 · 32.6%
- Black 502 · 31.8%
- Sultai 172 · 10.9%
- Jund 139 · 8.8%
- Abzan 82 · 5.2%
- Orzhov 44 · 2.8%
- Other (10) 125 · 7.9%
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 2.00 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.76 · 48.8% (84 of 172 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.74 · 51.7% (89 of 172 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.69 · 56.4% (97 of 172 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.61 · 40.1% (69 of 172 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.59 · 65.7% (113 of 172 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.51 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.46 · 61.0% (105 of 172 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.41 · 58.7% (101 of 172 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.38 · 31.4% (54 of 172 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.35 · 69.2% (119 of 172 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.27 · 50.6% (87 of 172 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.24 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.24 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.23 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.16 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 1.13 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 44.8% (77 of 172 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.01 · 32.0% (55 of 172 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.99 · 45.3% (78 of 172 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.98 · 23.3% (40 of 172 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.97 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 27.9% (48 of 172 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.93 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 37.2% (64 of 172 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 2.00 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.69 · 56.4% (97 of 172 decks)
- Iridescent Vinelasher relevance 1.61 · 40.1% (69 of 172 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.59 · 65.7% (113 of 172 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.51 · 33.1% (57 of 172 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.46 · 61.0% (105 of 172 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 1.41 · 58.7% (101 of 172 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.38 · 31.4% (54 of 172 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.35 · 69.2% (119 of 172 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.27 · 50.6% (87 of 172 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 36.6% (63 of 172 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.16 · 25.0% (43 of 172 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 44.8% (77 of 172 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.05 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.01 · 32.0% (55 of 172 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.99 · 45.3% (78 of 172 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.99 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.97 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.94 · 27.9% (48 of 172 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.93 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.93 · 37.2% (64 of 172 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.92 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.89 · 18.0% (31 of 172 decks)
- Baloth Woodcrasher relevance 0.87 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.86 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.84 · 24.4% (42 of 172 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.84 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.84 · 17.4% (30 of 172 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.82 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 43.6% (75 of 172 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.74 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.24 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.87 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.73 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.73 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
All enchantments (11)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 1.76 · 48.8% (84 of 172 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.74 · 51.7% (89 of 172 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.24 · 28.5% (49 of 172 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.23 · 26.2% (45 of 172 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 1.02 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.98 · 23.3% (40 of 172 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.80 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.77 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Soul Stair Expedition relevance 0.76 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.74 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.74 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 1.13 · 26.7% (46 of 172 decks)
All lands (1)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.74 · 33.7% (58 of 172 decks)
EDH data for Caustic Crawler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 172 real decks.