Magus of the Order
Played in 2,068 Green decks
3030+36+1+5+3+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu 53.0% of decks
Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu 53.0% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 26.1% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 26.1% of decks
Melira, Sylvok Outcast 39.6% of decks
Melira, Sylvok Outcast 39.6% of decks
Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger 8.6% of decks
Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger 8.6% of decks
Yeva, Nature's Herald 5.0% of decks
Yeva, Nature's Herald 5.0% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 7.2% of decks
Kogla, the Titan Ape 7.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Scryb Ranger 31.5% of decks
Scryb Ranger 31.5% of decks
Quirion Ranger 40.3% of decks
Quirion Ranger 40.3% of decks
Yisan, the Wanderer Bard 20.9% of decks
Yisan, the Wanderer Bard 20.9% of decks
Den Protector 18.1% of decks
Den Protector 18.1% of decks
Ainok Survivalist 17.6% of decks
Ainok Survivalist 17.6% of decks
Evolutionary Leap 19.5% of decks
Evolutionary Leap 19.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 4.33 · 53.0% (321 of 606 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 3.77 · 26.1% (434 of 1,663 decks)
- Melira, Sylvok Outcast relevance 2.78 · 39.6% (53 of 134 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 1.71 · 8.6% (55 of 636 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.33 · 5.0% (51 of 1,022 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 1.25 · 7.2% (23 of 320 decks)
- Six relevance 1.01 · 2.8% (55 of 1,948 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 0.94 · 4.3% (19 of 437 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.92 · 6.7% (10 of 149 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 2.4% (41 of 1,726 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.85 · 3.5% (19 of 539 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.73 · 2.5% (22 of 888 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.70 · 2.2% (25 of 1,155 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.63 · 1.2% (67 of 5,502 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.61 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.60 · 1.2% (61 of 5,165 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.58 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (16 of 852 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.56 · 2.9% (8 of 277 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.53 · 1.0% (57 of 5,657 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.53 · 3.8% (5 of 131 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.51 · 1.1% (39 of 3,541 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.51 · 2.5% (8 of 326 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.50 · 1.5% (19 of 1,304 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (19 of 1,448 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Durnan of the Yawning Portal relevance 0.42 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Karvanista, Loyal Lupari // Lupari Shield relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (3 of 81 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.38 · 1.2% (13 of 1,108 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 1.03 · 31.5% (652 of 2,068 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.01 · 40.3% (834 of 2,068 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.96 · 20.9% (432 of 2,068 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.91 · 18.1% (374 of 2,068 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.89 · 17.6% (364 of 2,068 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.85 · 19.5% (403 of 2,068 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.83 · 28.7% (593 of 2,068 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.83 · 26.5% (549 of 2,068 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.79 · 28.0% (580 of 2,068 decks)
- Temur Charger relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (290 of 2,068 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.76 · 22.8% (472 of 2,068 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.75 · 14.0% (289 of 2,068 decks)
- Orochi Leafcaller relevance 0.72 · 12.3% (255 of 2,068 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.70 · 30.6% (633 of 2,068 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.69 · 46.7% (966 of 2,068 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.69 · 17.1% (353 of 2,068 decks)
- Proteus Machine relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (258 of 2,068 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (301 of 2,068 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (280 of 2,068 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (317 of 2,068 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (264 of 2,068 decks)
- Duskwatch Recruiter // Krallenhorde Howler relevance 0.68 · 16.2% (335 of 2,068 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (262 of 2,068 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.67 · 18.5% (382 of 2,068 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (318 of 2,068 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.67 · 15.9% (329 of 2,068 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.66 · 28.5% (589 of 2,068 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.65 · 19.5% (404 of 2,068 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.64 · 21.8% (451 of 2,068 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.64 · 25.5% (527 of 2,068 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 1.03 · 31.5% (652 of 2,068 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.01 · 40.3% (834 of 2,068 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 0.96 · 20.9% (432 of 2,068 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 0.91 · 18.1% (374 of 2,068 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 0.89 · 17.6% (364 of 2,068 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.83 · 26.5% (549 of 2,068 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.79 · 28.0% (580 of 2,068 decks)
- Temur Charger relevance 0.77 · 14.0% (290 of 2,068 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.75 · 14.0% (289 of 2,068 decks)
- Orochi Leafcaller relevance 0.72 · 12.3% (255 of 2,068 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.70 · 30.6% (633 of 2,068 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.69 · 46.7% (966 of 2,068 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.69 · 17.1% (353 of 2,068 decks)
- Proteus Machine relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (258 of 2,068 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.69 · 14.6% (301 of 2,068 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.68 · 15.3% (317 of 2,068 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (264 of 2,068 decks)
- Duskwatch Recruiter // Krallenhorde Howler relevance 0.68 · 16.2% (335 of 2,068 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.67 · 18.5% (382 of 2,068 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.67 · 15.4% (318 of 2,068 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.66 · 28.5% (589 of 2,068 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.64 · 25.5% (527 of 2,068 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.63 · 14.7% (303 of 2,068 decks)
- Nervous Gardener relevance 0.62 · 11.4% (236 of 2,068 decks)
- Skyshroud Poacher relevance 0.62 · 12.2% (252 of 2,068 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.62 · 20.3% (419 of 2,068 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.62 · 39.1% (808 of 2,068 decks)
- Chancellor of the Tangle relevance 0.60 · 11.4% (235 of 2,068 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.60 · 29.9% (619 of 2,068 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.60 · 18.0% (372 of 2,068 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (592 of 2,068 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.59 · 17.4% (359 of 2,068 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.59 · 22.9% (473 of 2,068 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.59 · 25.8% (533 of 2,068 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (234 of 2,068 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.58 · 19.9% (412 of 2,068 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (299 of 2,068 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.85 · 19.5% (403 of 2,068 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (262 of 2,068 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.67 · 15.9% (329 of 2,068 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.65 · 19.5% (404 of 2,068 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (225 of 2,068 decks)
All instants (3)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.76 · 22.8% (472 of 2,068 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.64 · 21.8% (451 of 2,068 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.62 · 28.9% (598 of 2,068 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.83 · 28.7% (593 of 2,068 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (280 of 2,068 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.60 · 28.4% (588 of 2,068 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.60 · 23.9% (495 of 2,068 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.58 · 12.2% (253 of 2,068 decks)
EDH data for Magus of the Order: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,068 real decks.




















































