Cards like Cultivate
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 55%
- Kodama's Reach 51%
- Rampant Growth 38%
- Grow from the Ashes 7%
- Roamer's Routine 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 5%
- Migration Path 5%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Far Wanderings 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
Other options: Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Path to the Festival
Cards like Scute Swarm
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 33%
- Springheart Nantuko 18%
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards like Krosan Grip
4.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 26%
- Naturalize 8%
- Natural Reclamation 2%
- Wear Away 2%
Other options: Wilt, Break Asunder, Oxidize, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Verdigris
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.74 in other green decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 69%
- Basalt Monolith 8%
- Grim Monolith 3%
- Mana Vault 3%
Cards like Arcane Signet
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Lull, Haze of Pollen, Defend the Hearth, Chameleon Blur, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Vine Snare, Druid's Deliverance
Cards like Apex Devastator
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kodama of the North Tree relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Kodama of the South Tree relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Kodama of the Center Tree relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Iname, Life Aspect relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Sekki, Seasons' Guide relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Sharp-Eyed Rookie relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.20 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.20 · 39.1% (50 of 128 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Bounteous Kirin relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.20 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.19 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Elder Pine of Jukai relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.40 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Loam Dweller relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Oboro Breezecaller relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.21 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Kodama of the North Tree relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Kodama of the South Tree relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Kodama of the Center Tree relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Iname, Life Aspect relevance 0.39 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Myojin of Life's Web relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Sekki, Seasons' Guide relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Sharp-Eyed Rookie relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.24 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.31 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.20 · 40.6% (52 of 128 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.20 · 39.1% (50 of 128 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (41 of 128 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Bounteous Kirin relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.20 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.19 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Elder Pine of Jukai relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.40 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Loam Dweller relevance 0.31 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Oboro Breezecaller relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.39 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.22 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.21 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.21 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.17 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.19 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Heroes' Bane relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.20 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.20 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.26 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.23 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.14 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.19 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.16 · 19.5% (25 of 128 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.16 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Long-Forgotten Gohei relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 34.4% (44 of 128 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.15 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.14 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.13 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.12 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 68.8% (88 of 128 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.17 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.21 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.15 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.16 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.17 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 55.5% (71 of 128 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wild Pair relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.14 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.14 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.14 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- The World Spell relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.16 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.11 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.12 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All instants (50)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.18 · 25.8% (33 of 128 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.17 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.17 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.15 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Thwart the Enemy relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.15 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Kodama's Might relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- In the Presence of Ages relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.11 · 33.6% (43 of 128 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.13 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.08 · 32.8% (42 of 128 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.10 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.10 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.10 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.20 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.16 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.18 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 50.8% (65 of 128 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.16 · 27.3% (35 of 128 decks)
- Walk with the Ancestors relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.20 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.18 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (24 of 128 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.20 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Whirlwind relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.14 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 54.7% (70 of 128 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.15 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 36.7% (47 of 128 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.10 · 37.5% (48 of 128 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.12 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.11 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.11 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.14 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.19 · 24.2% (31 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.19 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
All utility lands (35)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 38.3% (49 of 128 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (40 of 128 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.15 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.11 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.14 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.11 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Pendelhaven relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.09 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
All lands (32)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.30 · 18.0% (23 of 128 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.21 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.34 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.34 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.18 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Azor's Gateway // Sanctum of the Sun relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.15 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Island relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.13 · 21.1% (27 of 128 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (7 of 128 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (6 of 128 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 3.9% (5 of 128 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (4 of 128 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (3 of 128 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 85.9% (110 of 128 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kodama of the East Tree, from 128 real Commander decks.