Cards like Incubation Druid
9.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Incubation Druid 50%
- Gyre Sage 50%
Cards like Counterspell
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 68%
- Negate 29%
- Spell Snare 4%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Wild Growth
9.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 32%
- Fertile Ground 14%
- Dawn's Reflection 7%
- Overgrowth 7%
- Blighted Burgeoning 4%
- Wolfwillow Haven 4%
- Shimmerwilds Growth 4%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
7.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lux Cannon
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Lux Cannon 25%
- Magistrate's Scepter 14%
Other options: Blue Mana Battery, Gemstone Array, Green Mana Battery
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
3.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Spectral Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spectral Deluge 18%
- Engulf the Shore 11%
Cards like Astral Cornucopia
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Astral Cornucopia 29%
- Coalition Relic 11%
Other options: Elementalist's Palette, Ventifact Bottle, Kyren Toy
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
5.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sublime Epiphany
5.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
5.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aetherize 32%
- Evacuation 11%
- Perplexing Test 4%
Cards like Fathom Mage
5.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fathom Mage 36%
- Pensive Professor 14%
Other options: Mister Hyde, Monster Within, The Astonishing Ant-Man
Cards like Kiora's Follower
3.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kiora's Follower 39%
- Fatestitcher 7%
- Forensic Researcher 7%
- Kelpie Guide 4%
- North Pole Patrol 4%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 4%
Other options: Niblis of the Breath, Captain of the Mists, Puppeteer, Stonybrook Angler
Cards like Kodama's Reach
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kodama's Reach 36%
- Cultivate 32%
- Rampant Growth 25%
- Traverse the Outlands 7%
- Grow from the Ashes 4%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Repulsive Mutation
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Power Conduit
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thrummingbird
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Dreamtide Whale
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Dreamtide Whale 32%
- Flux Channeler 11%
Cards like Sol Ring
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.30 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.34 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.27 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 0.32 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.24 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.30 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.31 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.22 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.21 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.25 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.18 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.23 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.16 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.24 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.17 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Choke relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.30 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.34 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.27 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- The Flood of Mars relevance 0.32 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.31 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.22 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.21 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.16 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Colossal Whale relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Armored Scrapgorger relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.17 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Tidal Barracuda relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.18 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.20 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Sab-Sunen, Luxa Embodied relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Slippery Bogbonder relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.19 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.16 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Harbor Serpent relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Serpent of the Endless Sea relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Outcaster Trailblazer relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.24 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.18 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.23 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.27 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.24 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Agent's Toolkit relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.23 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.15 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Surge Node relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Vexing Puzzlebox relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Orb of Dreams relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mana Geode relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Unlicensed Hearse relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fraying Line relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Uthros Scanship relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tablet of Compleation relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.30 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.25 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.25 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Choke relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Bounty of the Luxa relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Freyalise's Winds relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Fishliver Oil relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Quest for Renewal relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.12 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thoughtleech relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Shimmering Wings relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Curse of Predation relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Sea Devils relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Temporal Distortion relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fool's Demise relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bottomless Pool // Locker Room relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All instants (50)
- High Tide relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.21 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.19 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.16 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.19 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.13 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- This Town Ain't Big Enough relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Everdream relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.15 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.14 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Calamitous Tide relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tsunami relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Research the Deep relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Typhoon relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Body of Research relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Golden Ratio relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Winterthorn Blessing relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Invasion of Shandalar // Leyline Surge relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.19 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.24 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.20 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.16 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.13 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.17 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.12 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Blinkmoth Well relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- The Monumental Facade relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
All lands (50)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Tendo Ice Bridge relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.17 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.16 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.11 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hollow Trees relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sand Silos relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.07 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.08 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 75.0% (21 of 28 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.10 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.08 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.09 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.07 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood, from 28 real Commander decks.