Cards like Duskshell Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
3.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Duskshell Crawler 83%
- Pridemalkin 67%
- Tuskguard Captain 50%
- Gnarlid Colony 50%
- Crowned Ceratok 33%
- Drix Fatemaker 17%
Other options: Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Servant of the Scale
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ichorclaw Myr
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Ichorclaw Myr 50%
- Tel-Jilad Fallen 50%
Cards like Glistener Elf
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Glistener Elf 67%
- Blightwidow 50%
- Cystbearer 50%
- Phyrexian Digester 50%
Cards like Cultivate
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
83% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 83%
- Kodama's Reach 50%
- Rampant Growth 50%
- Beneath the Sands 17%
- Grow from the Ashes 17%
- Roamer's Routine 17%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Search for Tomorrow, Shared Roots, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Skyshroud Claim
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
3.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Skyshroud Claim 100%
- Three Visits 67%
- Nature's Lore 67%
- Ranger's Path 33%
- Field Trip 17%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 17%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Harrow
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 83%
- Cycle of Renewal 67%
Other options: Roiling Regrowth, Entish Restoration, Scapeshift, Planar Engineering
Cards like Aquastrand Spider
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Pollenbright Druid
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Tyrranax Atrocity
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Gaea's Gift
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards like Sabertooth Cobra
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Sabertooth Cobra 17%
- Marsh Viper 17%
Cards like Spike Worker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Spike Worker 17%
- Spike Drone 17%
Other options: Spike Colony, Spike Tiller, Spike Feeder, Spike Hatcher, Spike Weaver, Spike Rogue, Salt Road Quartermasters, Spike Soldier, Spike Breeder
Cards like Cobbled Wings
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Cobbled Wings 17%
- Fleetfeather Sandals 17%
- Bladed Pinions 17%
- Aeronaut's Wings 17%
- Cloak of the Bat 17%
Other options: Neurok Hoversail, Wings of Hubris, Kitesail
Cards like Elfsworn Giant
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Elfsworn Giant 33%
- Sporemound 17%
Cards like Winding Way
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Winding Way 50%
- Mulch 17%
Other options: Scout the Borders, In the Presence of Ages, Relentless Pursuit
Cards like Diligent Farmhand
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Atraxa's Fall
16× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Atraxa's Fall 17%
- Airship Crash 17%
Other options: Broken Wings, Crushing Canopy, Wing Snare, Shattered Wings, Return to the Earth, Thornado, Plummet, Pinion Feast, Crushing Vines, Unforgiving Aim, Eaten by Spiders, Shower of Arrows
Cards like Return to Nature
15× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Explore
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
All top picks (50)
- Servant of the Scale relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.24 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Sporeback Troll relevance 0.29 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Rot Wolf relevance 0.26 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Wickerbough Elder relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.28 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Aquastrand Spider relevance 0.28 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Simic Initiate relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Phantom Tiger relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.21 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.20 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Fallen relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tumble Magnet relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Phyrexian Digester relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.19 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Contagious Vorrac relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Implement of Ferocity relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Corpse Cur relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Serrated Arrows relevance 0.27 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.21 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Cystbearer relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.17 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Darksteel Pendant relevance 0.25 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.17 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Ichorclaw Myr relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Cytospawn Shambler relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Pygmy Kavu relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.15 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Renewal relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.14 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Tyrranax Atrocity relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Treetop Snarespinner relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Servant of the Scale relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Scrounging Bandar relevance 0.29 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Urban Daggertooth relevance 0.24 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Sporeback Troll relevance 0.29 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Rot Wolf relevance 0.26 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Wickerbough Elder relevance 0.25 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.28 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Aquastrand Spider relevance 0.28 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Simic Initiate relevance 0.28 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Phantom Tiger relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.21 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.20 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Fallen relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Phyrexian Digester relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Contagious Vorrac relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Corpse Cur relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.21 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Cystbearer relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Glistener Elf relevance 0.19 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.17 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Blightwidow relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.17 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Ichorclaw Myr relevance 0.21 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Cytospawn Shambler relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Pygmy Kavu relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Tyrranax Atrocity relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Blight Mamba relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Treetop Snarespinner relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Viridian Betrayers relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Crowned Ceratok relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.13 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Plague Nurse relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 0.16 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Branchblight Stalker relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Adaptive Sporesinger relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Temperamental Oozewagg relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Wily Bandar relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All artifacts (21)
- Arcane Spyglass relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tumble Magnet relevance 0.29 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Implement of Ferocity relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Serrated Arrows relevance 0.27 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Darksteel Pendant relevance 0.25 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.13 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Aeronaut's Wings relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Bladed Pinions relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Cobbled Wings relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Pristine Talisman relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (9)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.14 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.11 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All instants (28)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.13 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.10 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.09 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Zuko's Exile relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Pistus Strike relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.07 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.06 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.05 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.03 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All sorceries (32)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.19 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.15 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Renewal relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.09 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.08 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Field Trip relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Fade into Antiquity relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.09 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.05 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.07 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.04 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.04 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All utility lands (10)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.20 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.16 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.18 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.08 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.06 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.05 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (14)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.15 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.16 · 83.3% (5 of 6 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.14 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.13 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (3 of 6 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.09 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Warped Landscape relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (6 of 6 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Evolution Sage, from 6 real Commander decks.