Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 30%
- Rapid Hybridization 27%
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Mirrormade
5.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mirrormade 36%
- Copy Enchantment 9%
- Copy Land 5%
- Copy Artifact 3%
Cards like Enduring Curiosity
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Expedition Map
17× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Traveler's Amulet, Armillary Sphere, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map, Wanderer's Twig
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 39%
- Elvish Mystic 29%
- Fyndhorn Elves 14%
- Gyre Engineer 2%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like The Eternity Elevator
18× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.72 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 34%
- Three Visits 32%
- Skyshroud Claim 5%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 49%
- Negate 23%
- Wash Away 5%
- Spell Snare 2%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Stern Scolding 1%
Other options: Disruption Protocol, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Sol Ring
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 75%
- Basalt Monolith 10%
- Mana Vault 5%
- Grim Monolith 4%
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 23%
- Rhystic Study 21%
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Whisperer of the Wilds, Leafkin Druid
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
5.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Badgermole Cub
4.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.64 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.60 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.61 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.48 · 38.7% (99 of 256 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (44 of 256 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.57 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.51 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.51 · 28.1% (72 of 256 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.46 · 37.1% (95 of 256 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.58 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.50 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Impossible Man relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Synthesizer Labship relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.38 · 39.5% (101 of 256 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.44 · 25.8% (66 of 256 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Curie, Emergent Intelligence relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.42 · 29.7% (76 of 256 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.41 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Deluxe Dragster relevance 0.57 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.45 · 20.3% (52 of 256 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.49 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.41 · 25.8% (66 of 256 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.43 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.41 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.54 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Rolling Hamsphere relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Vexing Puzzlebox relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.34 · 39.1% (100 of 256 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.34 · 38.3% (98 of 256 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.31 · 40.2% (103 of 256 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.30 · 41.8% (107 of 256 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.60 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Council of Reeds relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.48 · 38.7% (99 of 256 decks)
- Silent Hallcreeper relevance 0.51 · 28.1% (72 of 256 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.46 · 37.1% (95 of 256 decks)
- Impossible Man relevance 0.63 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Loki, God of Mischief relevance 0.54 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.38 · 39.5% (101 of 256 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.44 · 25.8% (66 of 256 decks)
- Curie, Emergent Intelligence relevance 0.55 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.42 · 29.7% (76 of 256 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.51 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.41 · 25.8% (66 of 256 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.43 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- The Vision relevance 0.54 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Kimahri, Valiant Guardian relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.31 · 40.2% (103 of 256 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.30 · 41.8% (107 of 256 decks)
- Loki, Lord of Misrule relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.32 · 28.1% (72 of 256 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.39 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.38 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.37 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Voltaic Construct relevance 0.49 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.33 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.30 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.30 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.29 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.31 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.32 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.26 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Coretapper relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Super-Adaptoid relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Biovisionary relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.22 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- Ultron, Artificial Malevolence relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.61 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (44 of 256 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.51 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.58 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Synthesizer Labship relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Deluxe Dragster relevance 0.57 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.45 · 20.3% (52 of 256 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.41 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Wurmwall Sweeper relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Rolling Hamsphere relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Vexing Puzzlebox relevance 0.50 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.34 · 38.3% (98 of 256 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.40 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Kimoyo Beads relevance 0.56 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.35 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Arc Reactor relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Golem Foundry relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.38 · 13.3% (34 of 256 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.38 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Darksteel Ingot relevance 0.42 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.38 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.40 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Uthros Scanship relevance 0.46 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- N'Yami-Class Mother Ship relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Atmospheric Greenhouse relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Crown of Gondor relevance 0.46 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Skysovereign, Consul Flagship relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Cosmic Crucible relevance 0.64 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.50 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.49 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.41 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.49 · 12.9% (33 of 256 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.34 · 39.1% (100 of 256 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.49 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Master's Guidance relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.37 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.40 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.35 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.20 · 28.9% (74 of 256 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.21 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.21 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.26 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.24 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
All instants (50)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.31 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.26 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.27 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.25 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.30 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.19 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 34.8% (89 of 256 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (76 of 256 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.20 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.17 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.25 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.15 · 33.6% (86 of 256 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.14 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 49.2% (126 of 256 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.17 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.57 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.33 · 21.5% (55 of 256 decks)
- Multiversal Incursion relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.34 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.28 · 23.4% (60 of 256 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.29 · 20.3% (52 of 256 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.37 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.28 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Here Comes a New Hero! relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 0.27 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Ancient Stirrings relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 31.6% (81 of 256 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 34.0% (87 of 256 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (64 of 256 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.22 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.45 · 21.1% (54 of 256 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.36 · 40.6% (104 of 256 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.40 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.35 · 21.5% (55 of 256 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.31 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.30 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.33 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.31 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Villainous Hideout relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.19 · 23.8% (61 of 256 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 25.8% (66 of 256 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.18 · 19.5% (50 of 256 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.32 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (13 of 256 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (21 of 256 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.16 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (16 of 256 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 14.8% (38 of 256 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.11 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (6 of 256 decks)
All lands (50)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.40 · 64.1% (164 of 256 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.47 · 28.9% (74 of 256 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.38 · 25.0% (64 of 256 decks)
- Valgavoth's Lair relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.40 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.31 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.23 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Lotus Vale relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.20 · 33.2% (85 of 256 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.18 · 31.6% (81 of 256 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (20 of 256 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.20 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.20 · 17.2% (44 of 256 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.18 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.28 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.20 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 10.5% (27 of 256 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (19 of 256 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 34.4% (88 of 256 decks)
- Pym Technologies relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (8 of 256 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (23 of 256 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.12 · 46.5% (119 of 256 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.12 · 47.7% (122 of 256 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (10 of 256 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.10 · 57.4% (147 of 256 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 52.7% (135 of 256 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.15 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (9 of 256 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (12 of 256 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (15 of 256 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (11 of 256 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (7 of 256 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.10 · 40.6% (104 of 256 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Absorbing Man, from 256 real Commander decks.