Sylvan Ranger
Played in 337 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
1430+31+2+2+2+9+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (14)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.02 · 2.9% (40 of 1,390 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.52 · 1.2% (45 of 3,630 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 1.37 · 1.4% (25 of 1,772 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.99 · 1.3% (10 of 744 decks)
- Gut, True Soul Zealot // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.93 · 3.5% (4 of 113 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Breeches, Brazen Plunderer relevance 0.83 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Guild Artisan relevance 0.83 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.70 · 1.2% (5 of 418 decks)
- Grand Warlord Radha relevance 0.68 · 1.1% (5 of 455 decks)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Tavern Brawler relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.33 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.26 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 1.03 · 21.4% (72 of 337 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.89 · 26.4% (89 of 337 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.87 · 30.0% (101 of 337 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (64 of 337 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.73 · 10.7% (36 of 337 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.68 · 21.1% (71 of 337 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (38 of 337 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (57 of 337 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (30 of 337 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.59 · 19.9% (67 of 337 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (30 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.58 · 10.7% (36 of 337 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (49 of 337 decks)
- Living Twister relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (39 of 337 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.56 · 35.9% (121 of 337 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (32 of 337 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (43 of 337 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (33 of 337 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (27 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (31 of 337 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (55 of 337 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.51 · 17.2% (58 of 337 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.50 · 24.0% (81 of 337 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.49 · 21.7% (73 of 337 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.48 · 16.9% (57 of 337 decks)
- Viridian Emissary relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (25 of 337 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 24.9% (84 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 30.3% (102 of 337 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (58 of 337 decks)
- Peregrination relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (23 of 337 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 1.03 · 21.4% (72 of 337 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.89 · 26.4% (89 of 337 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.87 · 30.0% (101 of 337 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (64 of 337 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.73 · 10.7% (36 of 337 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.68 · 21.1% (71 of 337 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (57 of 337 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.61 · 8.9% (30 of 337 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.59 · 19.9% (67 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.58 · 10.7% (36 of 337 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (49 of 337 decks)
- Living Twister relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (39 of 337 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.56 · 35.9% (121 of 337 decks)
- Groundskeeper relevance 0.53 · 9.8% (33 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (31 of 337 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (55 of 337 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.51 · 17.2% (58 of 337 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.50 · 24.0% (81 of 337 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.48 · 16.9% (57 of 337 decks)
- Viridian Emissary relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (25 of 337 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.45 · 30.3% (102 of 337 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.43 · 11.0% (37 of 337 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.43 · 7.7% (26 of 337 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.43 · 20.5% (69 of 337 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (59 of 337 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.42 · 13.1% (44 of 337 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.39 · 17.2% (58 of 337 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.38 · 12.5% (42 of 337 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.38 · 12.2% (41 of 337 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.37 · 13.9% (47 of 337 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (39 of 337 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.52 · 8.0% (27 of 337 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (24 of 337 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.45 · 17.2% (58 of 337 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (36 of 337 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 0.49 · 21.7% (73 of 337 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (33 of 337 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.64 · 11.3% (38 of 337 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (30 of 337 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.54 · 9.5% (32 of 337 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.54 · 12.8% (43 of 337 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 24.9% (84 of 337 decks)
- Peregrination relevance 0.44 · 6.8% (23 of 337 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.41 · 9.5% (32 of 337 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (27 of 337 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (22 of 337 decks)
All lands (4)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.60 · 26.4% (89 of 337 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.57 · 31.8% (107 of 337 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.55 · 36.2% (122 of 337 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (55 of 337 decks)
EDH data for Sylvan Ranger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 337 real decks.

























































