Sustenance
Played in 28 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
10.0% Jund
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.49 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.42 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Need for Speed relevance 1.41 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.39 · 75.0% (21 of 28 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.38 · 85.7% (24 of 28 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.36 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.36 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.30 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.29 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.26 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.24 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 1.20 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.19 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.18 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.16 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 1.15 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.14 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.06 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.05 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.04 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 1.04 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.03 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.02 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.00 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.94 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.93 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.49 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.42 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.38 · 85.7% (24 of 28 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.36 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.29 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.26 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.25 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.24 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 1.20 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.19 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.16 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 1.15 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.06 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 1.04 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.03 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.02 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.94 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.93 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.91 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.90 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Sprouting Goblin relevance 0.90 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.89 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.86 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Juri, Master of the Revue relevance 0.86 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.82 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.82 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.79 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Mazirek, Kraul Death Priest relevance 0.78 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.39 · 75.0% (21 of 28 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.30 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.30 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.18 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Need for Speed relevance 1.41 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.85 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
All instants (4)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.36 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.04 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.00 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.14 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.05 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.82 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 1.15 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.95 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
All lands (5)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.05 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.03 · 82.1% (23 of 28 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 1.00 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.93 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Rocky Tar Pit relevance 0.87 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
EDH data for Sustenance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 28 real decks.