Embargo
Played in 51 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.4% Simic
All commanders (1)
- Shameless Charlatan // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.54 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mana Breach relevance 1.31 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 1.07 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 1.03 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.01 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.99 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.84 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.75 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.72 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.68 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.57 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.54 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.52 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.50 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.48 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.47 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.46 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.81 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.72 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.54 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.50 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.48 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.47 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.46 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.44 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.34 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
All enchantments (11)
- Mana Breach relevance 1.31 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 1.07 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 1.05 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.99 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.84 · 33.3% (17 of 51 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.76 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.75 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.39 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
All instants (8)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.96 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.66 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.57 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.40 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.37 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.35 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.32 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Devastation Tide relevance 1.03 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 1.01 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.90 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.80 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.69 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.52 · 41.2% (21 of 51 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.42 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.41 · 31.4% (16 of 51 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.41 · 15.7% (8 of 51 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.41 · 23.5% (12 of 51 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.38 · 27.5% (14 of 51 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.68 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.48 · 21.6% (11 of 51 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.44 · 25.5% (13 of 51 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.41 · 19.6% (10 of 51 decks)
All lands (2)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.62 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (9 of 51 decks)
EDH data for Embargo: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 51 real decks.