Cards like Sculptor of Winter
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sculptor of Winter 79%
- Rime Tender 75%
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Oakhame Adversary, Keeper of Fables, Grazilaxx, Illithid Scholar
Cards like Rimefeather Owl
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Winter Orb
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Winter Orb 87%
- Winter Moon 52%
Cards like Frozen Aether
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Frozen Aether 50%
- Root Maze 38%
Cards like Glittering Frost
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Glittering Frost 52%
- Wild Growth 33%
- Fertile Ground 8%
- Overgrowth 2%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth
Cards like Lightning Greaves
2.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Sultai decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 50%
- Swiftfoot Boots 38%
Cards like Arcum's Astrolabe
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Arcum's Astrolabe 46%
- Icehide Golem 15%
Cards like Rhystic Study
2.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 40%
- Mystic Remora 38%
Cards like Hailstorm Valkyrie
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Hailstorm Valkyrie 29%
- Chilling Shade 13%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
3.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Vampiric Tutor 37%
- Imperial Seal 12%
- Grim Tutor 6%
- Cruel Tutor 4%
Cards like Wilderness Reclamation
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
8.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swan Song 25%
- Strix Serenade 8%
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Collector Ouphe
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Collector Ouphe 25%
- Cursed Totem 6%
Cards like Winter's Rest
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Winter's Rest 38%
- Bitter Chill 6%
- Stunning Strike 2%
Other options: Waterknot, Locked in the Cemetery, Tangle Kelp, Blossombind, Mesmerizing Dose, Stay Hidden, Stay Silent, Capture Sphere, Runner's Bane, Ringing Strike Mastery, Sleep Magic, So Shiny, Melancholy, Sleep Paralysis, Unquenchable Thirst, Thirst, Claustrophobia, Infinite Coursework, Dramatic Accusation, Frozen in Ice, Bind the Monster, Castaway's Despair, Bewitching Leechcraft, Spectral Prison, Bubble Snare, Sleeping Potion, Charmed Sleep, Motion Sickness, Containment Protocol, Singing Bell Strike, Paralyze, Mystic Restraints, Starlight Snare, Enchanted River's Grasp
Cards like Counterspell
1.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 54%
- Negate 23%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Essence Scatter, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Force of Will
2.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 17%
- Force of Negation 13%
Cards like Heroic Intervention
4.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 65%
- Mana Vault 8%
- Basalt Monolith 4%
- Grim Monolith 2%
Cards like Back to Basics
No other Sultai decks run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 0% of other Sultai decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Back to Basics 42%
- Embargo 4%
Cards like Rimewind Cryomancer
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Static Orb
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Static Orb 52%
- Storage Matrix 2%
Cards like Mana Drain
15× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Mana Drain 23%
- Plasm Capture 2%
Cards like Boreal Druid
1.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Boreal Druid 75%
- Fyndhorn Elves 15%
- Llanowar Elves 13%
- Elvish Mystic 6%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Bog Initiate, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Urborg Elf, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Coldsteel Heart
7.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Guardian Idol, Star Compass
Cards like Worldly Tutor
5.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 15%
- Sylvan Tutor 2%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
4.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession, Personal Tutor
Cards like Demonic Tutor
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Demonic Collusion, Illicit Shipment, Demonic Bargain, Behold the Beyond, Diabolic Revelation
All top picks (50)
- Ice-Fang Coatl relevance 0.21 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Dead of Winter relevance 0.18 · 88.5% (46 of 52 decks)
- Marit Lage's Slumber relevance 0.20 · 78.8% (41 of 52 decks)
- Sculptor of Winter relevance 0.20 · 78.8% (41 of 52 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Rime Tender relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.21 · 73.1% (38 of 52 decks)
- Ohran Viper relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Spirit of the Aldergard relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Rimefeather Owl relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Draugr Necromancer relevance 0.23 · 61.5% (32 of 52 decks)
- Blood on the Snow relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Graven Lore relevance 0.23 · 59.6% (31 of 52 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.21 · 69.2% (36 of 52 decks)
- Abominable Treefolk relevance 0.22 · 61.5% (32 of 52 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.19 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Glittering Frost relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Ascendant Spirit relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.23 · 57.7% (30 of 52 decks)
- Icebreaker Kraken relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Frost Augur relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Narfi, Betrayer King relevance 0.25 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Rime Transfusion relevance 0.25 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Conifer Wurm relevance 0.25 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Blessing of Frost relevance 0.25 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Glacial Revelation relevance 0.26 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Pilfering Hawk relevance 0.26 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.17 · 82.7% (43 of 52 decks)
- Blizzard Brawl relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Winter's Rest relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.24 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Boreal Outrider relevance 0.27 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.24 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Hailstorm Valkyrie relevance 0.27 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Icebind Pillar relevance 0.26 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Blizzard Specter relevance 0.28 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Priest of the Haunted Edge relevance 0.28 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.15 · 86.5% (45 of 52 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.24 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Avalanche Caller relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Sunstone relevance 0.28 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Rimewind Cryomancer relevance 0.28 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ice-Fang Coatl relevance 0.21 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Sculptor of Winter relevance 0.20 · 78.8% (41 of 52 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Rime Tender relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Ohran Viper relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Spirit of the Aldergard relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Rimefeather Owl relevance 0.22 · 63.5% (33 of 52 decks)
- Draugr Necromancer relevance 0.23 · 61.5% (32 of 52 decks)
- Abominable Treefolk relevance 0.22 · 61.5% (32 of 52 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.19 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Ascendant Spirit relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Frost Augur relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Icebreaker Kraken relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Narfi, Betrayer King relevance 0.25 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Conifer Wurm relevance 0.25 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 0.23 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Pilfering Hawk relevance 0.26 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Boreal Outrider relevance 0.27 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Hailstorm Valkyrie relevance 0.27 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Blizzard Specter relevance 0.28 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Priest of the Haunted Edge relevance 0.28 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.26 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Avalanche Caller relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Rimewind Cryomancer relevance 0.28 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.21 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Icehide Golem relevance 0.28 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Chilling Shade relevance 0.27 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Iceberg Cancrix relevance 0.26 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Vampire Hexmage relevance 0.26 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.23 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Blizzard Strix relevance 0.26 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Frostpeak Yeti relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Berg Strider relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Grim Draugr relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Icehide Troll relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Rimewind Taskmage relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Frostweb Spider relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.22 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Mutated Cultist relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Rimebound Dead relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.21 · 69.2% (36 of 52 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.23 · 57.7% (30 of 52 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Arcum's Astrolabe relevance 0.24 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Icebind Pillar relevance 0.26 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.15 · 86.5% (45 of 52 decks)
- Sunstone relevance 0.28 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.20 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.27 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.25 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.19 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Tangle Wire relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Prowler's Helm relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.19 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Crawlspace relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Sphere of Resistance relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Orb of Dreams relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.17 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Eon Hub relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Mana Web relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Marit Lage's Slumber relevance 0.20 · 78.8% (41 of 52 decks)
- Glittering Frost relevance 0.24 · 51.9% (27 of 52 decks)
- Rime Transfusion relevance 0.25 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.17 · 82.7% (43 of 52 decks)
- Winter's Rest relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.24 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (26 of 52 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.24 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- The Three Seasons relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Rising Waters relevance 0.25 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Snow Devil relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Underworld Connections relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Freyalise's Winds relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.19 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Bitter Chill relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Upwelling relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Snowblind relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Embargo relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- King Narfi's Betrayal relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All instants (50)
- Graven Lore relevance 0.23 · 59.6% (31 of 52 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.27 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Winter's Chill relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.28 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.27 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.22 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Ice Out relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Chill to the Bone relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.19 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 21.2% (11 of 52 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.22 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.15 · 53.8% (28 of 52 decks)
- Icy Blast relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.18 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Succumb to the Cold relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.20 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.20 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.20 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.16 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.21 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.18 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.22 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Thermal Flux relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.15 · 36.5% (19 of 52 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.18 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.18 · 17.3% (9 of 52 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.18 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Dead of Winter relevance 0.18 · 88.5% (46 of 52 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.21 · 73.1% (38 of 52 decks)
- Blood on the Snow relevance 0.20 · 75.0% (39 of 52 decks)
- Blessing of Frost relevance 0.25 · 44.2% (23 of 52 decks)
- Glacial Revelation relevance 0.26 · 42.3% (22 of 52 decks)
- Blizzard Brawl relevance 0.26 · 38.5% (20 of 52 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.28 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Cone of Cold relevance 0.26 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.23 · 28.8% (15 of 52 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.25 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.18 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.24 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 30.8% (16 of 52 decks)
- Mythos of Brokkos relevance 0.24 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.21 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (24 of 52 decks)
- Dig Up relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.18 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Casualties of War relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Maelstrom Pulse relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Cruel Tutor relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Profane Command relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.21 · 26.9% (14 of 52 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.20 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Garruk, Apex Predator relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Scrying Sheets relevance 0.22 · 65.4% (34 of 52 decks)
- Frostwalk Bastion relevance 0.25 · 48.1% (25 of 52 decks)
- Faceless Haven relevance 0.24 · 48.1% (25 of 52 decks)
- Mouth of Ronom relevance 0.26 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.21 · 40.4% (21 of 52 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.27 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.26 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.21 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (13 of 52 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.12 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.12 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.10 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.10 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.09 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.08 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.06 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
All lands (50)
- Frost Marsh relevance 0.21 · 69.2% (36 of 52 decks)
- Shimmerdrift Vale relevance 0.22 · 61.5% (32 of 52 decks)
- Woodland Chasm relevance 0.17 · 94.2% (49 of 52 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.16 · 96.2% (50 of 52 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.16 · 96.2% (50 of 52 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.16 · 96.2% (50 of 52 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.19 · 67.3% (35 of 52 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.15 · 100.0% (52 of 52 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.15 · 98.1% (51 of 52 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (12 of 52 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 19.2% (10 of 52 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.19 · 15.4% (8 of 52 decks)
- Snow-Covered Wastes relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.19 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.17 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.17 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.13 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.16 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.16 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.12 · 34.6% (18 of 52 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.15 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.15 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 32.7% (17 of 52 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.11 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 13.5% (7 of 52 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.14 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.09 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Lake of the Dead relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Forsaken City relevance 0.12 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.08 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 5.8% (3 of 52 decks)
- Journey to Eternity // Atzal, Cave of Eternity relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.11 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 65.4% (34 of 52 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.09 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.08 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.06 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.06 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.06 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff, from 52 real Commander decks.