Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-25 of 50
All top picks (50)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.62 · 55.3% (166 of 300 decks)
- Geode Golem relevance 0.72 · 25.0% (75 of 300 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (91 of 300 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.52 · 32.7% (98 of 300 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (58 of 300 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.39 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (77 of 300 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.39 · 40.3% (121 of 300 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.37 · 43.3% (130 of 300 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.46 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (42 of 300 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (46 of 300 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.36 · 39.3% (118 of 300 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.39 · 30.0% (90 of 300 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.43 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- World War Hulk relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Pounce relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.41 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.42 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Cherished Hatchling relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.38 · 21.7% (65 of 300 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.30 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.26 · 57.7% (173 of 300 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.40 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.34 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.30 · 38.3% (115 of 300 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
- Regal Imperiosaur relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Savage Order relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.24 · 57.0% (171 of 300 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Shifting Ceratops relevance 0.43 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Sunfrill Imitator relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Colossadactyl relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.33 · 18.0% (54 of 300 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.28 · 34.7% (104 of 300 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.29 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.38 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.33 · 18.0% (54 of 300 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Cultivate
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
71% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 70%
- Kodama's Reach 62%
- Rampant Growth 56%
- Migration Path 13%
- Explosive Vegetation 13%
- Search for Tomorrow 6%
- Shared Roots 4%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- Verdant Mastery 1%
- Reach the Horizon 1%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Primal Growth 1%
Other options: They Went This Way, Untamed Wilds, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique, Path to the Festival
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 51%
- Skyshroud Claim 44%
- Three Visits 43%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 11%
- Ranger's Path 5%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
- Hunting Wilds 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Llanowar Tribe
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 61%
- Elvish Mystic 55%
- Fyndhorn Elves 41%
- Boreal Druid 5%
- Leaf Gilder 2%
- Fyndhorn Elder 2%
- Greenweaver Druid 2%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Goobbue Gardener 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Gigantosaurus
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Scaled Wurm, Broodhunter Wurm, Barbtooth Wurm, Grizzled Outrider, Order of the Sacred Bell, Leatherback Baloth, Gnarled Mass, Canopy Gorger, Pheres-Band Centaurs, Trained Armodon, Wild Ceratok, Murasa Brute, Moss Monster, Enormous Baloth, Cowl Prowler, Golden Bear, Spined Karok, Southern Elephant, Durkwood Boars, Feral Krushok, Axebane Beast, Hollowhenge Beast, Vastwood Gorger, Blanchwood Treefolk, Axebane Stag, Silverback Ape, Vorstclaw, Primordial Wurm, Colossapede, Ironroot Treefolk, Tusked Colossodon, Thornhide Wolves, Kindercatch, Plated Wurm, Nema Siltlurker, Nettle Swine
Cards like Prizefight
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Prizefight 19%
- Pounce 10%
Cards like Bushwhack
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards like Apex Devastator
11× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards like Apex Altisaur
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Apex Altisaur 39%
- Thorn Mammoth 4%
Other options: Affectionate Indrik, Somberwald Stag, Pheres-Band Brawler, Atzocan Archer, Agatha's Champion
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
3.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Turtle Tracks, New Frontiers
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 20%
- Mana Reflection 13%
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards like Entish Restoration
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Haunted Cloak
5.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Rancor
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wild Growth
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Market Festival
Cards like Knight of the Stampede
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 53% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other green decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Geode Golem relevance 0.72 · 25.0% (75 of 300 decks)
- Knight of the Stampede relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (91 of 300 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.52 · 32.7% (98 of 300 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.39 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.39 · 40.3% (121 of 300 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.37 · 43.3% (130 of 300 decks)
- Ranging Raptors relevance 0.51 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.49 · 14.0% (42 of 300 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (46 of 300 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.36 · 39.3% (118 of 300 decks)
- Verdant Sun's Avatar relevance 0.39 · 30.0% (90 of 300 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Cherished Hatchling relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Tyrranax Rex relevance 0.38 · 21.7% (65 of 300 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.30 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Thundering Spineback relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.26 · 57.7% (173 of 300 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.34 · 27.0% (81 of 300 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.30 · 38.3% (115 of 300 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (45 of 300 decks)
- Regal Imperiosaur relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Rampaging Brontodon relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.24 · 57.0% (171 of 300 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Shifting Ceratops relevance 0.43 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Sunfrill Imitator relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Colossadactyl relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.29 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Dinosaur Egg relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Ancient Imperiosaur relevance 0.40 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.27 · 30.3% (91 of 300 decks)
- Carnage Tyrant relevance 0.36 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Tranquil Frillback relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.31 · 14.3% (43 of 300 decks)
- Curious Altisaur relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Ripjaw Raptor relevance 0.35 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (75 of 300 decks)
- Scion of Calamity relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (17 of 300 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.30 · 15.7% (47 of 300 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
- Ravenous Sailback relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.25 · 30.0% (90 of 300 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Territorial Allosaurus relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.46 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.40 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.38 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Boxing Ring relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.33 · 18.0% (54 of 300 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.33 · 18.0% (54 of 300 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.34 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (25 of 300 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.25 · 35.0% (105 of 300 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.30 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.27 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (32 of 300 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.27 · 16.3% (49 of 300 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (25 of 300 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.29 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.30 · 8.7% (26 of 300 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (13 of 300 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (30 of 300 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.17 · 39.3% (118 of 300 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.20 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.31 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.30 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.28 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.12 · 55.3% (166 of 300 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Instrument of the Bards relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 17.0% (51 of 300 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.43 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- World War Hulk relevance 0.46 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.41 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.28 · 34.7% (104 of 300 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (25 of 300 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.20 · 57.3% (172 of 300 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.29 · 23.7% (71 of 300 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.30 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (42 of 300 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.24 · 15.3% (46 of 300 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 68.3% (205 of 300 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (20 of 300 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 21.3% (64 of 300 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (13 of 300 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.21 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.26 · 6.7% (20 of 300 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.17 · 32.7% (98 of 300 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.21 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (48 of 300 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (13 of 300 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (32 of 300 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (42 of 300 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (13 of 300 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (33 of 300 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All instants (50)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.62 · 55.3% (166 of 300 decks)
- Pounce relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (34 of 300 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.42 · 18.7% (56 of 300 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (37 of 300 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.21 · 48.0% (144 of 300 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.32 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.27 · 15.3% (46 of 300 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.24 · 19.7% (59 of 300 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.22 · 24.7% (74 of 300 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.21 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.21 · 23.7% (71 of 300 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.24 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.29 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 50.3% (151 of 300 decks)
- Hunter's Mark relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.19 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (27 of 300 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.17 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (19 of 300 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.16 · 23.0% (69 of 300 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.17 · 15.3% (46 of 300 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.17 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Bull's Strength relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Withstand Death relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.17 · 8.3% (25 of 300 decks)
- Back to Nature relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 42.0% (126 of 300 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (31 of 300 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (16 of 300 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 53.0% (159 of 300 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
All sorceries (50)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (58 of 300 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (77 of 300 decks)
- Commune with Dinosaurs relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Savage Order relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Barroom Brawl relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.38 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.28 · 28.7% (86 of 300 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.23 · 44.0% (132 of 300 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (39 of 300 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.26 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.25 · 23.3% (70 of 300 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 37.7% (113 of 300 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (22 of 300 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.16 · 62.3% (187 of 300 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (33 of 300 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (17 of 300 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (13 of 300 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 43.0% (129 of 300 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 43.0% (129 of 300 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.23 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.19 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.18 · 29.7% (89 of 300 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 56.0% (168 of 300 decks)
- Primal Surge relevance 0.31 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (57 of 300 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 50.7% (152 of 300 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 69.7% (209 of 300 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.23 · 6.7% (20 of 300 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Monstrous Onslaught relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
Planeswalkers
5
Planeswalkers
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
All planeswalkers (5)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (75 of 300 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.32 · 5.7% (17 of 300 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
Battles
2
Battles
2 
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.29 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
Utility Lands
32
Utility Lands
32 Showing 1-25 of 32
All utility lands (32)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.35 · 17.3% (52 of 300 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.18 · 47.3% (142 of 300 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (18 of 300 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.24 · 14.7% (44 of 300 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 29.3% (88 of 300 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 17.3% (52 of 300 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 39.0% (117 of 300 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (29 of 300 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 49.0% (147 of 300 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (30 of 300 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 33.7% (101 of 300 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (50 of 300 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.16 · 21.7% (65 of 300 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 11.7% (35 of 300 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (70 of 300 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.17 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (28 of 300 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (8 of 300 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 7.7% (23 of 300 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
Lands
15
Lands
15 Showing 1-15 of 15
All lands (15)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (59 of 300 decks)
- Welcome to . . . // Jurassic Park relevance 0.39 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (15 of 300 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (38 of 300 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.17 · 29.0% (87 of 300 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (36 of 300 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (21 of 300 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (11 of 300 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.18 · 8.0% (24 of 300 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (14 of 300 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (12 of 300 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (10 of 300 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (9 of 300 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 93.7% (281 of 300 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for The Tarrasque, from 300 real Commander decks.