Planetary Annihilation
Played in 486 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Naya
- Jund 18,344 · 79.8%
- Red 1,036 · 4.5%
- Gruul 805 · 3.5%
- Rakdos 562 · 2.4%
- Naya 486 · 2.1%
- Other (18) 1,762 · 7.7%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 2.90 · 4.0% (150 of 3,735 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.13 · 2.1% (94 of 4,385 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.65 · 51.0% (248 of 486 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.51 · 45.3% (220 of 486 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.47 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.46 · 39.1% (190 of 486 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.41 · 38.1% (185 of 486 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.38 · 32.5% (158 of 486 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.35 · 34.0% (165 of 486 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.33 · 29.8% (145 of 486 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.29 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.27 · 28.2% (137 of 486 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.26 · 42.2% (205 of 486 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.25 · 29.6% (144 of 486 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.22 · 46.3% (225 of 486 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.22 · 31.1% (151 of 486 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 33.1% (161 of 486 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 36.0% (175 of 486 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (152 of 486 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 40.1% (195 of 486 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (124 of 486 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.03 · 36.8% (179 of 486 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (133 of 486 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (134 of 486 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (115 of 486 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 30.0% (146 of 486 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.96 · 18.3% (89 of 486 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.95 · 33.1% (161 of 486 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 0.94 · 22.0% (107 of 486 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (138 of 486 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.94 · 35.8% (174 of 486 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.65 · 51.0% (248 of 486 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.51 · 45.3% (220 of 486 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.41 · 38.1% (185 of 486 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.38 · 32.5% (158 of 486 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 1.33 · 29.8% (145 of 486 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.29 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.26 · 42.2% (205 of 486 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.25 · 29.6% (144 of 486 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.18 · 33.1% (161 of 486 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 36.0% (175 of 486 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (152 of 486 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.04 · 25.5% (124 of 486 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.03 · 36.8% (179 of 486 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (134 of 486 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (115 of 486 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.96 · 30.0% (146 of 486 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.96 · 18.3% (89 of 486 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.95 · 33.1% (161 of 486 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.94 · 35.8% (174 of 486 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.46 · 39.1% (190 of 486 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.05 · 40.1% (195 of 486 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.47 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.94 · 28.4% (138 of 486 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.22 · 46.3% (225 of 486 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.38 · 39.3% (191 of 486 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.35 · 34.0% (165 of 486 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.27 · 28.2% (137 of 486 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.22 · 31.1% (151 of 486 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.03 · 27.4% (133 of 486 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 0.94 · 22.0% (107 of 486 decks)
All utility lands (14)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.65 · 48.6% (236 of 486 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.64 · 48.6% (236 of 486 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.64 · 48.1% (234 of 486 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.63 · 47.7% (232 of 486 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.63 · 47.5% (231 of 486 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.62 · 47.7% (232 of 486 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.51 · 43.2% (210 of 486 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.48 · 42.8% (208 of 486 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.47 · 42.2% (205 of 486 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.45 · 39.5% (192 of 486 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.09 · 30.0% (146 of 486 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.08 · 26.1% (127 of 486 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 0.98 · 23.7% (115 of 486 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.90 · 40.3% (196 of 486 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.53 · 48.4% (235 of 486 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.53 · 48.4% (235 of 486 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.48 · 42.2% (205 of 486 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.47 · 46.1% (224 of 486 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.31 · 35.6% (173 of 486 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.08 · 28.2% (137 of 486 decks)
EDH data for Planetary Annihilation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 486 real decks.