Color Identity Spread
3.3% Sultai
- Colorless 30,774 · 18.8%
- Black 18,440 · 11.3%
- Green 13,184 · 8.1%
- Five-Color 11,903 · 7.3%
- Simic 8,390 · 5.1%
- White 7,998 · 4.9%
- Blue 7,464 · 4.6%
- Red 6,260 · 3.8%
- Golgari 5,660 · 3.5%
- Abzan 5,489 · 3.4%
- Sultai 5,347 · 3.3%
- Gruul 4,646 · 2.8%
- Jund 4,146 · 2.5%
- Orzhov 3,453 · 2.1%
- Other (18) 30,457 · 18.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 3.63 · 35.0% (1,010 of 2,888 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.86 · 11.4% (252 of 2,207 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.77 · 24.3% (45 of 185 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 1.37 · 4.2% (1,167 of 28,113 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 1.19 · 5.4% (191 of 3,554 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.15 · 3.8% (538 of 14,210 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.06 · 3.4% (467 of 13,606 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.01 · 33.3% (6 of 18 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 0.92 · 3.6% (183 of 5,129 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.88 · 3.7% (132 of 3,580 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.76 · 2.6% (196 of 7,407 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (5 of 35 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.66 · 3.2% (55 of 1,709 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.65 · 3.6% (37 of 1,020 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.55 · 2.3% (69 of 3,015 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.45 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (6 of 113 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (3 of 33 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.41 · 1.6% (64 of 4,103 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (51 of 3,124 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (3 of 49 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.33 · 9.1% (2 of 22 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (38 of 2,984 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (45 of 3,927 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (8 of 373 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.25 · 1.4% (15 of 1,064 decks)
- Nashi, Moon's Legacy relevance 0.23 · 1.6% (10 of 645 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Spelunking relevance 1.05 · 35.0% (1,874 of 5,347 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 48.1% (2,571 of 5,347 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (1,416 of 5,347 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.00 · 25.8% (1,379 of 5,347 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (1,132 of 5,347 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (967 of 5,347 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.3% (2,209 of 5,347 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (982 of 5,347 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 31.9% (1,707 of 5,347 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.79 · 33.0% (1,762 of 5,347 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (935 of 5,347 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.78 · 31.0% (1,655 of 5,347 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 43.7% (2,338 of 5,347 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 30.8% (1,649 of 5,347 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (882 of 5,347 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (868 of 5,347 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 26.0% (1,388 of 5,347 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (1,097 of 5,347 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.73 · 20.8% (1,111 of 5,347 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 17.0% (909 of 5,347 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (841 of 5,347 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 27.6% (1,476 of 5,347 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 25.3% (1,354 of 5,347 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (782 of 5,347 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,500 of 5,347 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (905 of 5,347 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.3% (2,209 of 5,347 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 31.9% (1,707 of 5,347 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.79 · 17.5% (935 of 5,347 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.78 · 31.0% (1,655 of 5,347 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 43.7% (2,338 of 5,347 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 30.8% (1,649 of 5,347 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.73 · 26.0% (1,388 of 5,347 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.72 · 17.0% (909 of 5,347 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.71 · 15.7% (841 of 5,347 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 27.6% (1,476 of 5,347 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.68 · 25.3% (1,354 of 5,347 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (782 of 5,347 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (1,500 of 5,347 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (1,416 of 5,347 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.74 · 16.2% (868 of 5,347 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (1,097 of 5,347 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Spelunking relevance 1.05 · 35.0% (1,874 of 5,347 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.81 · 18.1% (967 of 5,347 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.79 · 33.0% (1,762 of 5,347 decks)
All instants (1)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 48.1% (2,571 of 5,347 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.00 · 25.8% (1,379 of 5,347 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.83 · 21.2% (1,132 of 5,347 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.80 · 18.4% (982 of 5,347 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.74 · 16.5% (882 of 5,347 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.73 · 20.8% (1,111 of 5,347 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (905 of 5,347 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.10 · 33.1% (1,772 of 5,347 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.09 · 33.6% (1,795 of 5,347 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.97 · 23.5% (1,254 of 5,347 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.96 · 23.3% (1,245 of 5,347 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.96 · 23.2% (1,242 of 5,347 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.95 · 40.0% (2,137 of 5,347 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 0.81 · 20.6% (1,104 of 5,347 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.77 · 38.1% (2,035 of 5,347 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (784 of 5,347 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.68 · 38.3% (2,049 of 5,347 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.67 · 36.6% (1,959 of 5,347 decks)
All lands (13)
- Vesuva relevance 1.06 · 28.2% (1,506 of 5,347 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.98 · 23.9% (1,279 of 5,347 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.97 · 23.8% (1,273 of 5,347 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.95 · 23.8% (1,272 of 5,347 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.95 · 23.8% (1,275 of 5,347 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (1,274 of 5,347 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.92 · 21.7% (1,161 of 5,347 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.89 · 21.7% (1,161 of 5,347 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.87 · 18.6% (997 of 5,347 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.84 · 23.9% (1,276 of 5,347 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.83 · 24.0% (1,285 of 5,347 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.82 · 24.2% (1,295 of 5,347 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.81 · 18.8% (1,006 of 5,347 decks)
EDH data for Urza's Cave: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,347 real decks.