Firebrand Ranger
Played in 62 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
43.1% Gruul
730+29+1+3+2+5+2+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Tuknir Deathlock relevance 0.66 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Marhault Elsdragon relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Radha, Coalition Warlord relevance 0.55 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.54 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.54 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Sunastian Falconer relevance 0.53 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Stangg relevance 0.53 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.37 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.29 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.83 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.82 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.79 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.75 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.74 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.63 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Khenra Charioteer relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.61 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.57 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.57 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.55 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.48 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.47 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.46 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.37 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 1.29 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.84 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.83 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.82 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.79 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.75 · 24.2% (15 of 62 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.63 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Khenra Charioteer relevance 0.61 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.61 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.59 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.57 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.57 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.48 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Quartzwood Crasher relevance 0.46 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Radha, Heir to Keld relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.43 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.42 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.38 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.36 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.68 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Druid Class relevance 0.58 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.52 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.34 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 0.47 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.39 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.74 · 12.9% (8 of 62 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.57 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.55 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.33 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.41 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.30 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
All lands (5)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.59 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.52 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.52 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.47 · 17.7% (11 of 62 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Firebrand Ranger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.














































