Cataclysmic Prospecting
Played in 3,369 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
84.2% Naya
- Naya 3,369 · 84.2%
- Red 108 · 2.7%
- Rakdos 95 · 2.4%
- Other (16) 431 · 10.8%
All commanders (5)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.07 · 48.2% (1,788 of 3,709 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.38 · 32.3% (1,407 of 4,350 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.55 · 7.0% (93 of 1,332 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.23 · 1.3% (5 of 372 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.08 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Map the Frontier relevance 3.13 · 89.2% (3,004 of 3,369 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 3.13 · 84.4% (2,843 of 3,369 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 3.11 · 96.1% (3,238 of 3,369 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.96 · 78.4% (2,641 of 3,369 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.56 · 68.7% (2,314 of 3,369 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.56 · 61.0% (2,056 of 3,369 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 2.52 · 61.5% (2,073 of 3,369 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.46 · 73.8% (2,487 of 3,369 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.42 · 67.9% (2,288 of 3,369 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.37 · 72.2% (2,431 of 3,369 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.32 · 71.2% (2,398 of 3,369 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.30 · 54.7% (1,842 of 3,369 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.29 · 52.5% (1,768 of 3,369 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.24 · 53.7% (1,808 of 3,369 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.09 · 47.0% (1,585 of 3,369 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.03 · 43.9% (1,480 of 3,369 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.98 · 50.5% (1,700 of 3,369 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.90 · 52.6% (1,773 of 3,369 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.89 · 41.0% (1,382 of 3,369 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 1.89 · 41.3% (1,391 of 3,369 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.87 · 46.1% (1,554 of 3,369 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.83 · 69.4% (2,339 of 3,369 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.81 · 64.4% (2,169 of 3,369 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 1.79 · 41.5% (1,399 of 3,369 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.77 · 38.6% (1,301 of 3,369 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.70 · 56.9% (1,917 of 3,369 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 1.69 · 33.9% (1,141 of 3,369 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 1.69 · 36.3% (1,222 of 3,369 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Sand Scout relevance 3.13 · 84.4% (2,843 of 3,369 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 3.11 · 96.1% (3,238 of 3,369 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 2.52 · 61.5% (2,073 of 3,369 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.46 · 73.8% (2,487 of 3,369 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.42 · 67.9% (2,288 of 3,369 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.37 · 72.2% (2,431 of 3,369 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.32 · 71.2% (2,398 of 3,369 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.30 · 54.7% (1,842 of 3,369 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.24 · 53.7% (1,808 of 3,369 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.03 · 43.9% (1,480 of 3,369 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.90 · 52.6% (1,773 of 3,369 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.89 · 41.0% (1,382 of 3,369 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 1.89 · 41.3% (1,391 of 3,369 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.81 · 64.4% (2,169 of 3,369 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.77 · 38.6% (1,301 of 3,369 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.70 · 56.9% (1,917 of 3,369 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.56 · 68.7% (2,314 of 3,369 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.87 · 46.1% (1,554 of 3,369 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 1.69 · 33.9% (1,141 of 3,369 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 1.83 · 69.4% (2,339 of 3,369 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 1.79 · 41.5% (1,399 of 3,369 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Map the Frontier relevance 3.13 · 89.2% (3,004 of 3,369 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.96 · 78.4% (2,641 of 3,369 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.56 · 61.0% (2,056 of 3,369 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.29 · 52.5% (1,768 of 3,369 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.09 · 47.0% (1,585 of 3,369 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.98 · 50.5% (1,700 of 3,369 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 1.69 · 36.3% (1,222 of 3,369 decks)
All utility lands (16)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 3.27 · 96.2% (3,241 of 3,369 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 3.25 · 95.0% (3,199 of 3,369 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 3.25 · 95.1% (3,204 of 3,369 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 3.23 · 95.2% (3,207 of 3,369 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 3.23 · 95.4% (3,213 of 3,369 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 3.23 · 95.5% (3,216 of 3,369 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 3.22 · 92.1% (3,102 of 3,369 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 3.16 · 90.6% (3,052 of 3,369 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 3.11 · 89.7% (3,022 of 3,369 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 2.31 · 63.1% (2,125 of 3,369 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.99 · 48.0% (1,617 of 3,369 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.96 · 88.2% (2,971 of 3,369 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.83 · 45.5% (1,532 of 3,369 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.79 · 43.1% (1,453 of 3,369 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.77 · 44.7% (1,507 of 3,369 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.72 · 41.3% (1,392 of 3,369 decks)
All lands (6)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 3.11 · 88.5% (2,983 of 3,369 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 3.05 · 82.8% (2,790 of 3,369 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 3.01 · 95.0% (3,201 of 3,369 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 3.00 · 94.5% (3,183 of 3,369 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.98 · 93.8% (3,161 of 3,369 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 2.01 · 52.7% (1,776 of 3,369 decks)
EDH data for Cataclysmic Prospecting: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,369 real decks.