Storm of Saruman
Played in 1,165 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3030+19+3+10+5+13+
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
0.43| 3.6%
$0.35 · €0.21$30.89 · €31.36
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 3.63 · 23.5% (151 of 643 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 2.61 · 6.5% (205 of 3,159 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 1.82 · 2.8% (177 of 6,268 decks)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 1.23 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Absorbing Man relevance 1.04 · 4.3% (11 of 258 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.87 · 1.7% (22 of 1,265 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.84 · 1.3% (33 of 2,504 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.80 · 1.8% (16 of 892 decks)
- Kiora, Sovereign of the Deep relevance 0.76 · 1.0% (39 of 3,788 decks)
- Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief relevance 0.72 · 1.0% (33 of 3,248 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.68 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (8 of 384 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.60 · 1.7% (8 of 466 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.60 · 1.2% (14 of 1,191 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.51 · 1.0% (11 of 1,083 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (2 of 55 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.41 · 2.0% (3 of 148 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.40 · 1.2% (5 of 418 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 0.40 · 1.0% (6 of 584 decks)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 0.37 · 1.6% (3 of 188 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- The Third Doctor relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.03 · 26.9% (313 of 1,165 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.89 · 30.5% (355 of 1,165 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (267 of 1,165 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (264 of 1,165 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (223 of 1,165 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (196 of 1,165 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (333 of 1,165 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.67 · 16.9% (197 of 1,165 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.65 · 19.4% (226 of 1,165 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.63 · 19.2% (224 of 1,165 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (222 of 1,165 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.62 · 13.2% (154 of 1,165 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (200 of 1,165 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.61 · 33.1% (386 of 1,165 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (179 of 1,165 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (172 of 1,165 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.58 · 18.5% (215 of 1,165 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (182 of 1,165 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (158 of 1,165 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (175 of 1,165 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (237 of 1,165 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (182 of 1,165 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.52 · 18.7% (218 of 1,165 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (175 of 1,165 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (160 of 1,165 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (160 of 1,165 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (153 of 1,165 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (165 of 1,165 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (148 of 1,165 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (138 of 1,165 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.03 · 26.9% (313 of 1,165 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.89 · 30.5% (355 of 1,165 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (264 of 1,165 decks)
- Thunderous Snapper relevance 0.62 · 13.2% (154 of 1,165 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.61 · 17.2% (200 of 1,165 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.61 · 33.1% (386 of 1,165 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (172 of 1,165 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (182 of 1,165 decks)
- Progenitor Mimic relevance 0.53 · 15.6% (182 of 1,165 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (175 of 1,165 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (114 of 1,165 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (208 of 1,165 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.48 · 10.8% (126 of 1,165 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.47 · 15.7% (183 of 1,165 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.46 · 13.6% (159 of 1,165 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.45 · 13.0% (151 of 1,165 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (116 of 1,165 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.43 · 20.2% (235 of 1,165 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (176 of 1,165 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (160 of 1,165 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.50 · 11.8% (138 of 1,165 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.44 · 24.4% (284 of 1,165 decks)
All enchantments (10)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.76 · 22.9% (267 of 1,165 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.67 · 16.9% (197 of 1,165 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (179 of 1,165 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.58 · 18.5% (215 of 1,165 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.56 · 13.6% (158 of 1,165 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (175 of 1,165 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (153 of 1,165 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.50 · 12.7% (148 of 1,165 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.47 · 26.1% (304 of 1,165 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (159 of 1,165 decks)
All instants (5)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (223 of 1,165 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.65 · 19.4% (226 of 1,165 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (222 of 1,165 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.53 · 20.3% (237 of 1,165 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.44 · 16.1% (187 of 1,165 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.70 · 16.8% (196 of 1,165 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.69 · 28.6% (333 of 1,165 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.63 · 19.2% (224 of 1,165 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.52 · 18.7% (218 of 1,165 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (160 of 1,165 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (165 of 1,165 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.49 · 38.6% (450 of 1,165 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (181 of 1,165 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 19.3% (225 of 1,165 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.47 · 17.8% (207 of 1,165 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (143 of 1,165 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (131 of 1,165 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.44 · 31.1% (362 of 1,165 decks)
EDH data for Storm of Saruman: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,165 real decks.


















































































