Cards like Tatyova, Steward of Tides
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
5.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
97% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards like Springheart Nantuko
9.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Simic decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Springheart Nantuko 53%
- Scute Swarm 41%
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eldritch Evolution 19%
- Neoform 19%
Cards like Devastation Tide
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Devastation Tide 31%
- Coastal Breach 19%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
8.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 47%
- Eureka Moment 19%
- Joint Exploration 3%
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Ashnod's Altar 16%
- Phyrexian Altar 13%
Cards like Sylvan Advocate
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sylvan Advocate 31%
- Earth Surge 19%
Cards like Badgermole Cub
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ruin Crab
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Ruin Crab 25%
- Hedron Crab 13%
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.3 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 47%
- Cultivate 41%
- Kodama's Reach 38%
- Harvest Season 16%
- Primal Growth 6%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
- Boundless Realms 3%
Other options: Traverse the Outlands, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Shared Roots, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Parallel Lives
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Parallel Lives 19%
- Doubling Season 16%
- Primal Vigor 6%
Cards like Essence Flux
4.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Loot, Exuberant Explorer
3.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
2.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 19%
- Mossborn Hydra 16%
- Scythecat Cub 13%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 3%
- Territorial Scythecat 3%
- Sazh's Chocobo 3%
- Undergrowth Champion 3%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Floral Evoker, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Llanowar Loamspeaker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mightform Harmonizer
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.33 · 84.4% (27 of 32 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.37 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.45 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.40 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.38 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.37 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.35 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.37 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 0.40 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.38 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.30 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.33 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.34 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.30 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.27 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.31 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.31 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.33 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.26 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.32 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.34 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.33 · 84.4% (27 of 32 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.37 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.37 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 0.37 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 0.40 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 0.33 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.35 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.34 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.34 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.26 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.18 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Roil Cartographer relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Earth Kingdom General relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Pol Jamaar, Illusionist relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.18 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.18 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.12 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.38 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.27 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.31 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.33 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.32 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.34 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Spawning Pit relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Journeyer's Kite relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.12 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Mirrormind Crown relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Myth Unbound relevance 0.45 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.30 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.31 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Raised by Giants relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.19 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.20 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.16 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.15 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Primal Cocoon relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Aid from the Cowl relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Genju of the Cedars relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Genju of the Falls relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Escape Protocol relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Prismatic Omen relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Ground Seal relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.40 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Scatter to the Winds relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.15 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.14 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.13 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Vivify relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Transcendent Message relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Censor relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Haze of Pollen relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Animate Land relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Vengeant Earth relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Root Snare relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.35 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.38 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.30 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.31 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.32 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.24 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Clutch of Currents relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Voidwalk relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Tromp the Domains relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Manifold Insights relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Floodwaters relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Genesis Storm relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Bumi's Feast Lecture relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Road of Return relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (14)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.31 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.27 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.32 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.36 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.29 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.34 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.26 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.27 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.29 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Soulstone Sanctuary relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.14 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.16 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.09 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Mishra's Foundry relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Mobilized District relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
All lands (50)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.17 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.13 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.10 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.10 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.13 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 65.6% (21 of 32 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.10 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.12 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.09 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.05 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.05 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 84.4% (27 of 32 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.04 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.06 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.05 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.05 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (32 of 32 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (32 of 32 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jyoti, Moag Ancient, from 32 real Commander decks.